I've been using a reflector only. No flash. Do you think I need a flash? Will it help the quality?
Feb 16, 2016 23:26 | #1 I've been using a reflector only. No flash. Do you think I need a flash? Will it help the quality?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 05:54 | #2 #1...you need to control your background as it draws the eye from the subject. The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hannya Goldmember 1,062 posts Likes: 66 Joined Apr 2008 Location: UK More info | Feb 17, 2016 07:52 | #3 As above, although I don't think its that distracting, and did you use a gold reflector? Liking #2. “Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 08:08 | #4 I used a silver reflector, I'm thinking of trying the white for a softer light next time. This is another edit, kind of softens her a bit. Image hosted by forum (776201) © gabe212 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Left Handed Brisket. | Feb 17, 2016 08:12 | #5 gabe212 wrote in post #17901745 I used a silver reflector, I'm thinking of trying the white for a softer light next time. This is another edit, kind of softens her a bit. it's not so much the color of the reflector, it is the placement. Needs to be at least a high as the head. What you have now is sometimes called monster lighting, where the subject is lit from below. Think of placing a flashlight under your chin and telling a ghost story around a campfire, not exactly flattering. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 09:08 | #6 heres some more Image hosted by forum (776208) © gabe212 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (776209) © gabe212 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JarvisCreativeStudios Goldmember More info | Feb 17, 2016 09:21 | #7 I like #2. I would just caution you on over sharpening. You can tell they're over sharpened due to the "halo" effect that's present in drastic color or contrast changes. I immediately noticed it on the boys fingers and teeth in #3. WEBSITE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 09:31 | #8 I agree that the background is to distracting in #1. I like #2 Jessi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dballphotography Senior Member 497 posts Likes: 121 Joined Sep 2012 Location: UK More info | Feb 17, 2016 10:25 | #9 I dont mind the back ground in 1, its not ideal but i can live with it. The image does look slightly soft to me and the pose needs work, as some one mentioned slightly squarer on to the camera, maybe drop the shoulder a touch and straighten her back. Also you have cropped her at the wrist which im not so keen on. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 12:10 | #10 Thank you everyone! Great advice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chet showed up to keep the place interesting More info | Feb 17, 2016 12:13 | #11 The dog picture is pretty sweet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 12:38 | #12 Permanent banI don't care for the posing in #1: she looks affected with lordosis and her facial expression is kinda listless. Furthermore, you placed your reflector too low and got spooky lighting, which doesn't flatter her at all. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 22:37 | #13 The background in #1 doesn't bother me personally, but I agree about the lighting issue. It's normal to have a reflector down low and aimed up at your subject when you have a stronger key light coming from above, such that the reflector is just filling in shadows under the chin. But here, the reflector has to be considered as the key light and placed high, because the sun is backlighting her. I love #2, that low-contrast vintage look is perfect for the subject. 5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1297 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||