Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 26 Feb 2016 (Friday) 06:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Camera Sales went down again in 2015

 
dolina
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,636 posts
Gallery: 749 photos
Likes: 3141
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Philippines
Post edited over 7 years ago by dolina.
     
Feb 26, 2016 06:37 |  #1

http://youtu.be/zFQOYm​PIRiQ (external link)

1920
x
1080
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
https://lensvid.com …aphics-2015-1920_1080.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.


Source: https://lensvid.com …ography-industry-in-2015/ (external link)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/4/LQ_778011.jpg
Image hosted by forum (778011) © dolina [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Visit my Flickr (external link), Facebook (external link) & 500px (external link) and see my photos. :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
Post edited over 7 years ago by Nathan. (3 edits in all)
     
Feb 26, 2016 10:33 |  #2

Trends are not surprising as smartphones are the go-to for most consumer needs these days. That explains for the fast declines in total cameras manufactured year over year and also the shrinking market for non-interchangeable lens cameras.

The only significant conclusion one might draw from these numbers is that compact cameras are on their way out.

The more serious photographers are represented by the mirrorless/DSLR statistics. What's interesting is the production of mirrorless/DSLR is roughly the same level as it was in 2010. In real numbers, the production of DSLRs have reduced while mirrorless have remained relatively steady. I'm assuming that production is increased and decreased due to market demand. Demand for DSLRs may have declined because the bodies are really so damn good in recent years, that people aren't clamoring for the latest model or upgrading as quickly, and there is very good used camera market that meets the needs of many.

As far as mirrorless cameras go, production has only increased marginally. This is probably due to the fact that they've really not made a true breakthrough in technology. They've come a good way, so far, and I'm thinking of getting the new Fuji XPro2. However, there's no replacing the DSLR market yet. There may be more demand when there are more competing fullframe, mirrorless cameras out there. Give it another 10 years.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,416 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4502
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (4 edits in all)
     
Feb 26, 2016 11:37 |  #3

Those who say that Canon is foolish in not pursuing the mirrorless market do not take into consideration that the mirrorless market is only about 1/3 the size of the dSLR market. And between 2012 to 2015, the mirrorless market has had mediocre growth from 3.0 Million cameras per year to the 3.2 Million cameras produced in 2015. Mirrorless is increasing as a percentage of the total camera market, but its numbers are scarcely keeping up with 1.08% annual growth in the worldwide population.

Yes, total camera production for ALL cameras with interchangeable lenses (both dSLR and mirrorless) has dropped significantly from a peak of 108 Milion cameras to only 22 Million cameras in 2015. The camera industry is hurting, and it seems NOT to correlate well with smartphone sales, in spite of some past tendency to blame smartphone cannibalization of camera sales there is not a good correlation of the two.
https://www.semiwiki.c​om …-smartphone-shipments-jpg (external link)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 7 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Feb 26, 2016 12:11 |  #4

Heya,

They're just numbers out of context. Really doesn't say anything other than "there's clearly something else doing photography & video than the dSLR."

GoPro has a big market. Smartphones are a massive market. Both cut sharply into the above mentioned niche market of dSLR/Mirrorless.

I don't have any data, but I'd be willing to bet there are more people with smartphones making money as a photographer than people with dSLR/Mirrorless & interchangeable lenses making money as a photographer these days. Again, these numbers are out of context. Put into context what it means to be an instagrammer or youtuber, you only need a smartphone with internet and the ability to post--money made, and the image quality matters not. The day of dSLR photographer is more a thing of the past, or a thing of necessity (such as sports & wildlife, etc). But that's putting the right tools in the right context.

It would be far more interesting to see the above numbers in context. What were the sales of dSLR/Mirrorless in the context of sports photography for example? Those would reflect the tool.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 26, 2016 14:09 |  #5

Canon sales numbers will go up for the next 2 years, and then head down again, and perhaps to even lower numbers.

I think cameras, like so many techie items before this, have reached a level of maturity that many people are happy with what they have and hold onto them longer. The new sensor breakthrough of Canon will guarantee increased sales over the next couple of years as that trickles to other bodies, but given the Canon track record, there won't be much to entice 1DX2 owners to a new 1 series without some sort of major feature or performance increase. This goes all the way down to the xxD and xxxD lines as well. Once you have usable 25600 and very little noise in the shadows, with advanced AF features and pretty high resolution, there is little that can be offered to the majority of camera owners that will coax them into buying a new body.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Feb 26, 2016 15:25 |  #6

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17914003 (external link)
I think cameras, like so many techie items before this, have reached a level of maturity that many people are happy with what they have and hold onto them longer.

Well put.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Feb 26, 2016 15:51 |  #7

MalVeauX wrote in post #17913908 (external link)
I'd be willing to bet there are more people with smartphones making money as a photographer than people with dSLR/Mirrorless & interchangeable lenses making money as a photographer these days.

no way.

i live in a small town and there are probably 4 or 5 full time DSLR photographers here. I don't know anyone that makes any money with an iPhone through any channel. People using iphones for social media income have a worldwide market and make pennies, or a fraction of a penny, per engaged consumer.

But I'd like to see some context too. Such as, how do today's numbers compared with 10, 15 and 20 years ago. I hove no problem with the number of camera sales declining ... in the hopes that it is a sign people like the crappy wedding "photographer" i saw on craigslist this morning realize that they can't compete. Mother/Daughter team that charges 125 bucks an hour and their chosen images were terrible. Please god stop buying cameras.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Feb 26, 2016 16:23 |  #8

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #17914118 (external link)
no way.

i live in a small town and there are probably 4 or 5 full time DSLR photographers here. I don't know anyone that makes any money with an iPhone through any channel. People using iphones for social media income have a worldwide market and make pennies, or a fraction of a penny, per engaged consumer.

But I'd like to see some context too. Such as, how do today's numbers compared with 10, 15 and 20 years ago. I hove no problem with the number of camera sales declining ... in the hopes that it is a sign people like the crappy wedding "photographer" i saw on craigslist this morning realize that they can't compete. Mother/Daughter team that charges 125 bucks an hour and their chosen images were terrible. Please god stop buying cameras.

Just because in your small town you experience what you say, doesn't mean there isn't over 1000 in Chicago, NY, Montreal, etc, each, or more, making money. Again, I'd be willing to make a bet that in the grand scheme of things, in terms of literally just making money (again, don't read that as "more" as that quantifier was not used), phones are doing more and more and more. There are more avenues and contexts than portraiture, etc. Advertising is simply the bigger market, and smartphones do that just fine.

I said making money. Not making "more" money.

But the allure of just taking photos of whatever and posting on instagram or posting a video on vine/youtube, and making some money, has tons of people just using their phones and it's effective enough. And that market is exploding.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Feb 26, 2016 16:42 |  #9

Camera sales aren't down because people might be making money with their camera phones. If phones are having any impact at all on camera sales, it is simply that people are comfortable enough to take pictures with their phones (and the phones are more capable now) to post up on media sites. It used to be that people would buy Rebels for their school events, etc, but phones are getting better and people don't have to shell out the money for a small DSLR with kit lenses in green box mode to get good family captures.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Feb 27, 2016 14:57 |  #10

MalVeauX wrote in post #17914158 (external link)
Just because in your small town you experience what you say, doesn't mean there isn't over 1000 in Chicago, NY, Montreal, etc, each, or more, making money.

and how many photographers are there in each of those cities?

I see what you are saying, or not saying, about "more money" but I still don't think there are that many people who rely on an iPhone for income.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,416 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4502
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 27, 2016 16:16 |  #11

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17914180 (external link)
Camera sales aren't down because people might be making money with their camera phones. If phones are having any impact at all on camera sales, it is simply that people are comfortable enough to take pictures with their phones (and the phones are more capable now) to post up on media sites. It used to be that people would buy Rebels for their school events, etc, but phones are getting better and people don't have to shell out the money for a small DSLR with kit lenses in green box mode to get good family captures.

If one considers casual photography as the situation in which smartphones are used a lot, one can easily deduce about how the smartphone usage interferes with the need for point and shoot cameras, whose sales are plummetting. But the statistical correlation between smartphone unit increase vs. point and shoot unit decline is statistically not a strong correlation at all. So smartphone use is merely incidental to the rapid decline of the point and shoot.

And dSLR sales are declining along a similar curve as the one reflecting point and shoots, but it simply is delayed by two years than the point and shoot decline! And while the curve is about the same shape (two years later), the statistical correlation between smartphone increase vs. dSLR decline is also not a strong correlation either.

Whatever is causing the rapid decline of point and shoots is also affecting dSLRs, and it isn't smartphones. And while mirrorless seems to be immune to whatever is affecting P&S and dSLR, it is merely holding steady (a very slow growth) after the initial adoption peak in Q4'2012
Japan's camera industry is freaking out about the cause of the decline, and very few blame smartphones for cannibalizing all the camera sales.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
Feb 27, 2016 16:28 |  #12

I wonder if longer product cycles could also be a contributing factor to the decline in camera sales


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Feb 27, 2016 16:34 |  #13

Ah, that's simply because I only bought one camera in 2015... ;)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Feb 27, 2016 16:53 |  #14

I'm on another "chat" forum totally unrelated to photography and have witnessed first hand peoples rise and fall love affair with the DSLR. That forum is a pretty good slice of life in America except that lower income and racial diversity is not well represented, at least not in proportion to the rest of America.

I've been on and off that board for nearly 15 years and have helped field a lot of questions about camera purchases. Most people I saw purchase a DSLR we're not super thrilled with it. The few people that took my advice and bought one of the canon SX series cameras made a point to come backs and tell me thanks for the recommendation.

The consumer furvor over DSLRs had to end.

We are lucky it spurred so much innovation, even though overall it has lprobably hurt the portrait and event industries. Microsoft FronPage had to die, WYSIWYG editors for real corporate websites had to die, or at least lay bleeding and in attended for a while.CEOs thinking their secretary could put together a catalog in MS Word had to go up in flames. It's time momtographers stop trying to charge for non professional results using a window, a lamp, and a wide open EFS 5.6 kit lens.

PS. I'm not a portrait photographer, this is not "sour grapes"


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Feb 27, 2016 16:55 |  #15

smythie wrote in post #17915373 (external link)
I wonder if longer product cycles could also be a contributing factor to the decline in camera sales

Absolutely.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,050 views & 11 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Camera Sales went down again in 2015
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1340 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.