Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 27 Oct 2010 (Wednesday) 15:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

You don't need a telescope

 
TCampbell
Senior Member
441 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 270
Joined Apr 2012
     
Mar 02, 2016 15:35 |  #1876

okieplainsdrifter wrote in post #17920502 (external link)
The Rosette was my first try with masked stretching using Pixinsight. My use of starmask is pretty limited and it shows! I am working now to try to get rid of the halo's. It was also my first attempt to shrink the stars using PI. Still learning but I'll get there. Here is another one I am working on.
thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by okieplainsdrifter in
./showthread.php?p=179​20502&i=i176950088
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

That looks fantastic! Those stars look great.

Here's what I do to shrink the stars in PI:

1) Use the "star mask" to generate the mask and then apply it to my image.

2) Then use "MorphologicalTransfor​mation" -- In the MorphologicalTransform​ation window set the size to "5 (25 elements)" and it should show you a 5x5 grid to the left. There are some icons just below the "Size" and "Way" pull-downs and you wan to find the icon that looks like a circle (2nd from left in the 2nd row of icons.)

3) Then go to the top section of that same window and reduce the "Amount" slider (it's set to 1.0 by default which means 100% and that's too much... back it off to about half (.50) and try it by applying it to the image (you might end up un-doing it and trying a little more or a little less). It does a nice job of shrinking the stars.

When you're shrinking stars then you're already at the point in your workflow which is more art than science... so the "right amount" is whatever you think looks good... :-)

All the other defaults tend to be fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
okieplainsdrifter
Member
60 posts
Likes: 75
Joined Oct 2008
     
Mar 02, 2016 19:21 as a reply to  @ TCampbell's post |  #1877

Thanks T! I did not reduce the Amount slider was my first problem. Pixinsight was well worth the money!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sunnysu
Hatchling
3 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2016
Post edited over 2 years ago by sunnysu.
     
Mar 03, 2016 09:20 as a reply to  @ post 17916047 |  #1878

beautiful shot!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sunnysu
Hatchling
3 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2016
     
Mar 03, 2016 09:52 as a reply to  @ post 17835336 |  #1879

billions of stars! nice capture




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swltr
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Gallery: 120 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 2316
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Germany
     
Mar 06, 2016 11:36 |  #1880

Aurora Australis and Milky Way

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7798/18209667108_0929965bc2_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tK8i​BJ  (external link) Aurora Australis & Milky Way (external link) by Steffen Walther (external link), auf Flickr

http://www.steffenwalt​her-photographics.de (external link)
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swltr
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Gallery: 120 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 2316
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Germany
     
Mar 06, 2016 11:36 |  #1881

Dolomites night

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1456/25261517410_a6dcda324d_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/EugT​2C  (external link) Dolomites night (external link) by Steffen Walther (external link), auf Flickr

http://www.steffenwalt​her-photographics.de (external link)
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swltr
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Gallery: 120 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 2316
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Germany
     
Mar 06, 2016 11:37 |  #1882

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1537/24022541004_2fe1547c48_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/CAMN​vs  (external link) Alpine night sky (external link) by Steffen Walther (external link), auf Flickr

http://www.steffenwalt​her-photographics.de (external link)
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 332
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Mar 06, 2016 13:27 as a reply to  @ swltr's post |  #1883

Is that the actual color you saw in the Aurora ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 332
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Mar 06, 2016 13:29 |  #1884

Your last two shots look bright as day . what lens and f/stop did you use ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Davenn
Senior Member
Avatar
960 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 425
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 2 years ago by Davenn. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 06, 2016 19:41 |  #1885

Celestron wrote in post #17925713 (external link)
Your last two shots look bright as day . what lens and f/stop did you use ?


one would have to assume there was a moon in the sky lighting up the landscape

edit....
did a search on moon phases and as assumed ... full moon was 3 days earlier than the photo
That's for the second shot ... the snow covered mountains

FM 23 Jan, image 26 Jan 2016


Dave


A picture is worth 1000 words ;)
Canon 5D3, 6D, 700D, a bunch of lenses and other bits, ohhh and some Pentax stuff ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buggz
Senior Member
783 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2007
     
Mar 19, 2016 21:33 |  #1886

Okay, I tried again on another clear night.
MUCH better focus this time, as I took my time.
Took MANY burst shots, and several video clips.
Unfortunately, I could not get the Registax, nor AutoStakkert apps to work stacking photos, nor video.
I used DeepSkyStacker for the following stack, which seems to work pretty good I think.
Especially, for not knowing what I'm doing!

Panasonic GH4, Canon 100-400L @ 400, Metabones T Speedbooster 0.64XL

IMAGE: http://www.cornbread.com/~buggz/OrionNebula-resized.jpg

5DMkII, 40D w/ grip, lenses, flashes, more stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,010 posts
Gallery: 1556 photos
Likes: 5526
Joined Dec 2011
     
Mar 19, 2016 22:05 |  #1887

buggz wrote in post #17941269 (external link)
Okay, I tried again on another clear night.
MUCH better focus this time, as I took my time.
Took MANY burst shots, and several video clips.
Unfortunately, I could not get the Registax, nor AutoStakkert apps to work stacking photos, nor video.
I used DeepSkyStacker for the following stack, which seems to work pretty good I think.
Especially, for not knowing what I'm doing!

Panasonic GH4, Canon 100-400L @ 400, Metabones T Speedbooster 0.64XL

QUOTED IMAGE


Very nice image our Panasonics sure create decent pictures with a little bit of our intervention;-)a:-)

P.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TCampbell
Senior Member
441 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 270
Joined Apr 2012
     
Mar 20, 2016 00:22 |  #1888

buggz wrote in post #17941269 (external link)
Okay, I tried again on another clear night.
MUCH better focus this time, as I took my time.
Took MANY burst shots, and several video clips.
Unfortunately, I could not get the Registax, nor AutoStakkert apps to work stacking photos, nor video.
I used DeepSkyStacker for the following stack, which seems to work pretty good I think.
Especially, for not knowing what I'm doing!

Panasonic GH4, Canon 100-400L @ 400, Metabones T Speedbooster 0.64XL

QUOTED IMAGE

Very nice image!

BTW, with regard to Registax, AutoStakkert, and Deep-Sky Stacker...

Deep-Sky Stacker (and other programs that are used to stack deep-sky images) use the positions of stars identified in the frame to align (register the positions) of the frames to a master frame so that they will all stack correctly.

Planetary images (including the moon) the images are very short -- so short that normally stars won't show up in the image (unless the planet happens to be near a particularly bright stars). That means reliance of stars to register the frames won't work... so those programs rely on the "disk" of the planet shape to register the alignment.

This is why Deep-Sky Stacker worked for this image (you have stars it can use to register the alignment of each frame), but Registax and AutoStakkert did not work (they're looking for the round "disk" shape of a planet or moon to align the frames and you don't have one of those in this image.)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buggz
Senior Member
783 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2007
     
Mar 20, 2016 09:48 |  #1889

Thanks for this explaination.
I wasted a LOT of time trying to get those programs to work, I really wanted them to work!
*8^)
Now I know, thanks again!

TCampbell wrote in post #17941376 (external link)
Very nice image!

BTW, with regard to Registax, AutoStakkert, and Deep-Sky Stacker...

Deep-Sky Stacker (and other programs that are used to stack deep-sky images) use the positions of stars identified in the frame to align (register the positions) of the frames to a master frame so that they will all stack correctly.

Planetary images (including the moon) the images are very short -- so short that normally stars won't show up in the image (unless the planet happens to be near a particularly bright stars). That means reliance of stars to register the frames won't work... so those programs rely on the "disk" of the planet shape to register the alignment.

This is why Deep-Sky Stacker worked for this image (you have stars it can use to register the alignment of each frame), but Registax and AutoStakkert did not work (they're looking for the round "disk" shape of a planet or moon to align the frames and you don't have one of those in this image.)


5DMkII, 40D w/ grip, lenses, flashes, more stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buggz
Senior Member
783 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2007
     
Mar 20, 2016 10:08 |  #1890

I also find that I have 3 nice frames of "a shooting star" along with the nebula.
I am wondering how to process for a simple .GIF animated sequence.
This would be cool, my niece and nephew liked those frame sequences.


5DMkII, 40D w/ grip, lenses, flashes, more stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

619,597 views & 542 likes for this thread
You don't need a telescope
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is WilliamParman
466 guests, 374 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.