Thank you.
Thank you. Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop  More info | Mar 05, 2016 07:53 | #17 I know this seems a little backwards for what you might use it for...but I wanted to get a good crisp moonstar, so, smaller aperture and longer exposure.   ThePowerOfTheMoon by Travis Rhoads, on FlickrAnd one shot wide open.  Image hosted by forum (779426) © TRhoads [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
These two images provide a nice demonstration of the versatility of the lens. Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 10, 2016 20:44 | #19  Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
futureal33 Member  148 posts Likes: 17 Joined Mar 2010 Location: UK, Manchester More info | Mar 11, 2016 05:37 | #20 I created a review on my blog about this amazing lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info |  Permanent banI read your review. Thanks for posting that. I want this lens, but that kind of money is hard to justify for an unpaid amateur. Beautiful wedding work, too. Inspiring.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop  More info | Mar 11, 2016 06:40 | #22 futureal33 wrote in post #17931393 I created a review on my blog about this amazing lens http://www.nickenglishphotography.com …s-review---real-world-use In short, it is amazing and I use it heavily at weddings!! Nice review and beautiful photos Nick! David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mookalafalas Cream of the Crop  More info | Mar 12, 2016 20:20 | #23 |
Mar 13, 2016 07:33 | #24 Mookalafalas wrote in post #17933346 Just saw this at my local shop for about $600. I didn't even know it existed! Looks pretty impressive--and fun. Sure it wasn't the 1.8? If it was really the 1.4 Art please get me one Body: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mookalafalas Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 14, 2016 10:58 | #25 Svenno wrote in post #17933637 Sure it wasn't the 1.8? If it was really the 1.4 Art please get me one  I'm sure it was the 1.4, although I'm not positive on the price. I was surprised when I saw it, and was more getting my head around its existence than thinking about how much it cost. It might have been $700, but I don't think it was more than that... Call me Al Gear Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 14, 2016 11:16 | #26 Jeff Hanson wrote in post #17924406 These two images provide a nice demonstration of the versatility of the lens. even $700 is a steal, I think its $899 most places...I am restraining myself.... Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2016 21:11 | #27 I still haven't had quality time to spend with this lens, everything I'm shooting is when it happens to be on the camera and I see something mildly interesting with a spare minute to stop and shoot. There's significant light fall off at 1.4, but it works for these images.    Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2016 22:28 | #28 Every time I see a new photo posted, It makes me want this lens more and more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 16, 2016 21:02 | #29  Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 17, 2016 20:11 | #30 OK, I know I can't be the only person shooting with this lens....   Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1304 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
