PhotogWannabe Senior Member More info | Apr 17, 2016 18:26 | #2626 Jo3r1 wrote in post #17974792   Finally becoming friends with this Fuji 23mm. Never really used the 35mm equivalent focal length a lot, but it is just such a crazy good piece of glass <3 With the sun behind, did you use flash? If so, beautifully balanced.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BambersImages Cream of the Crop  9,573 posts Likes: 4237 Joined Sep 2010 Location: UK More info | Apr 17, 2016 22:59 | #2627
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2016 23:29 | #2628 98kellrs wrote in post #17975107 You're using it very well as far as I can tell! I just picked up an 85mm prime, and now considering a ~35mm so I can get rid of the 24-70 2.8...hmm Thanks! PhotogWannabe wrote in post #17975229 With the sun behind, did you use flash? If so, beautifully balanced. Nope, no flash, and also no reflection screen. Those little Fujis have a pretty good dynamic range, and I also don't really care if the sky is blown out in shots like these
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lijy Mostly Lurking 19 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Apr 18, 2016 03:56 | #2629 7D mk ii with EF 85mm wide open... wife's classic leg raise.  Image hosted by forum (787896) © lijy [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 05:31 | #2630 BambersImages wrote in post #17975682  Train Driver by Clare Bambers, on FlickrMarvelous shot Canon, Nikon, Sony, Minolta, Fujifilm, Sigma, Tamron & Tokina
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 05:33 | #2631 A nun  Image hosted by forum (787906) © Mark K [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Canon, Nikon, Sony, Minolta, Fujifilm, Sigma, Tamron & Tokina
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 07:14 | #2632 Jessica V  Image hosted by forum (787912) © dragon76 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. www.deannita.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 09:20 | #2633 Great stuff! The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 09:54 | #2634 DanangMonkey wrote in post #17976016 Great stuff! thank you Canon, Nikon, Sony, Minolta, Fujifilm, Sigma, Tamron & Tokina
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BambersImages Cream of the Crop 9,573 posts Likes: 4237 Joined Sep 2010 Location: UK More info | Apr 18, 2016 10:26 | #2635 |
airbutchie Not too crunchy  More info | Apr 18, 2016 10:27 | #2636 DanangMonkey wrote in post #17973691 Understood, but wouldn't that choice be a faux pas on the model's part? Not saying that the bottom of shoes are normally visible on the street, but they are certainly quite visible with a walking model on an elevated platform, and with multiple photographers firing away from that same angle she must know it would show in the final product. I know nothing of your business and my question is only out of curiosity, would this photo get tossed out from publication? Sounds trivial on the surface (no pun intended), but in a business where extreme attention to detail rules the day it seems like it would be a factor. DM... Great follow up question/comment... I could only reply based on my speculation regarding the use of the used sandals... Whether it's the discretion of the stylist or the model, I can see some concern with showing the dirtiness of the sole... It is what it is... And I personally wouldn't think this image would be tossed out for publication use (print or social media)... The photo editor would probably have the last say in the matter... And if he/she wanted to, I'm sure they can photoshop the sole to give it a cleaner look... Hi. My name is Butch...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanangMonkey Senior Member  More info Post edited over 7 years ago by DanangMonkey. | Apr 18, 2016 10:50 | #2637 airbutchie wrote in post #17976073 DM... Great follow up question/comment... I could only reply based on my speculation regarding the use of the used sandals... Whether it's the discretion of the stylist or the model, I can see some concern with showing the dirtiness of the sole... It is what it is... And I personally wouldn't think this image would be tossed out for publication use (print or social media)... The photo editor would probably have the last say in the matter... And if he/she wanted to, I'm sure they can photoshop the sole to give it a cleaner look... With that said, I do have a few more captures of her on the runway without showing the sole... And being on the bottom tier of a 3-tier media platform, I'm more exposed to 'dirty shoe sole' visibility than the photographers who are above me... It was just my angle and perspective... If you have anymore C&C's, please feel free to ask me on this thread or send me a PM!!!  Certainly no criticism intended, it's a great shot. My question was only a curiosity of the inner workings of the editorial process. I have to admit I was quite surprised that the model could wear used shoes in an industry that examines everything with a microscope. Thanks for the response, quite interesting! The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 11:10 | #2638 I like it with the exception of the blurred bit in the bottom right. I just find it very distracting!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rebelsimon Goldmember  1,136 posts Likes: 1995 Joined Nov 2013 Location: Whitby, ON More info | Apr 18, 2016 16:29 | #2639 All with a 135mm f2        Toronto area photographer http://www.SimonMellickPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 17:30 | #2640 weldone Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1939 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
