Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Nikon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Dec 2014 (Thursday) 17:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

D750 Owners Group!

 
werds
"Yes, Sire. You'll shut your trap!"
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Delaware
     
May 01, 2016 07:41 |  #406

Fabercula wrote in post #17991341 (external link)
Sorry for bothering but I'd like to have an opinion about a lens.
I see you've got the 70-200 F2.8 with a 24-70; I own 24-120 and would like to buy the Sigma 70-200 F2.8, it has a good price. In your opinion, is it worth the money or would I use just a little?
I thought I could use it, e.g., for my son's shows at school; low light and so F2.8 is ok, distance and so the zoom 70-200 comes in handy.
Am I right?
Thanks in advance,
Fabrizio

Never a bother! The answer becomes about economics first. Can you afford a lens in your budget that might see limited use based on what you do. I love my 70-200 2.8 (currently the sharpest lens I own and spot on AF), for me this is a hobby and I make no money from it (an occasional couple of dollars here but I am not advertising as a business because my life is too hectic)... I decided the cost of the lens (I bought for 785 used I think) was worth the cost of paying a pro for recital pictures over a period of a few years... and our dance studio doesn't have a pro at our dance recitals so was a no brainer. I use it pretty much only for those indoor times and occasionally on the softball field where the focal length isn't too bad to use because the field is smaller.

As you already know the 2.8 is perfect for low light and the 70-200 now allows me to go wide enough when I need to get a full stage shot or a large group shot and zooms close enough that I can get fairly detailed shots. And even on some, I can still do a heavy crop and get nice results - not award winning but I am happy with the results and other dancers love them compared to their phone or point and shoot results. The only drawback is that now when I am taking the pictures I tend to be in the back of the theatre in order to get a good angle and be able to use the full focal range well.

So the economics only you can answer, the rest is a big fat YES!!!


Gear: Nikon D750, Nikon D7200, Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS, Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS HSM EX , Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Tamron 28-300mm Di VC PZD, Tamron 16-300mm VC PZD, Tamron 150-600 VC, Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.8, Nikon SB-900
POTN Seller Feedback (and other)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ49
Senior Member
605 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 275
Joined Nov 2009
     
May 01, 2016 09:19 as a reply to  @ werds's post |  #407

Mr. Werds, since you own both the d750 and d7200 how do you compare the white balance of the jpg's of the 2 cameras. I find, when handling the 7200 in the store, that the WB to be much better "out of the box" than the d750.


SX10is, S90, d5100 (35mm1.8, 18-55mm, 55-200mm), d750 (28-300mm, 50mm 1.8, 35-70mm 2.8, 24-120mm f/4, 85mm 1.8G), EOS-M5 (EF-M 15-45mm, 18-150mm, EF 40mm 2.8), RX10mk4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
werds
"Yes, Sire. You'll shut your trap!"
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Delaware
     
May 01, 2016 11:08 |  #408

russ49 wrote in post #17991613 (external link)
Mr. Werds, since you own both the d750 and d7200 how do you compare the white balance of the jpg's of the 2 cameras. I find, when handling the 7200 in the store, that the WB to be much better "out of the box" than the d750.


Well that is a thing that I find odd about the two. When using the D7200 outdoors I like the white balance MUCH more, but whenever the light becomes challenging or you have an odd mixture of lighting the D750 nails the white balance much better if sometimes slightly warm by 100 to 300 (on the 1000k scale). I think the reason for that is that the D750 has a slightly upgraded system for WB that when you have a wilder array of challenging colors it gets closer to correct, sometimes it is still out to left field wrong but more often than not I am impressed by how close large batches of shots are... The D7200 on the other hand gets more spot on in outdoors stuff that I have done and when the lighting isn't challenging.

But that is just my personal preference since I know that there is no one "correct" balance and even then my taste on correct white balance continues to change over time!


Gear: Nikon D750, Nikon D7200, Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS, Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS HSM EX , Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Tamron 28-300mm Di VC PZD, Tamron 16-300mm VC PZD, Tamron 150-600 VC, Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.8, Nikon SB-900
POTN Seller Feedback (and other)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ49
Senior Member
605 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 275
Joined Nov 2009
Post edited over 7 years ago by russ49. (3 edits in all)
     
May 01, 2016 14:10 |  #409

werds wrote in post #17991769 (external link)
Well that is a thing that I find odd about the two. When using the D7200 outdoors I like the white balance MUCH more, but whenever the light becomes challenging or you have an odd mixture of lighting the D750 nails the white balance much better if sometimes slightly warm by 100 to 300 (on the 1000k scale). I think the reason for that is that the D750 has a slightly upgraded system for WB that when you have a wilder array of challenging colors it gets closer to correct, sometimes it is still out to left field wrong but more often than not I am impressed by how close large batches of shots are... The D7200 on the other hand gets more spot on in outdoors stuff that I have done and when the lighting isn't challenging.

But that is just my personal preference since I know that there is no one "correct" balance and even then my taste on correct white balance continues to change over time!

I would expect them to be slightly different because from what I've read the sensor in the D750 is a Sony and the sensor in the d7200 is a Toshiba, and there is no low pass filter in the D7200 (possibly giving less tint and a bit brighter image).


SX10is, S90, d5100 (35mm1.8, 18-55mm, 55-200mm), d750 (28-300mm, 50mm 1.8, 35-70mm 2.8, 24-120mm f/4, 85mm 1.8G), EOS-M5 (EF-M 15-45mm, 18-150mm, EF 40mm 2.8), RX10mk4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ49
Senior Member
605 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 275
Joined Nov 2009
Post edited over 7 years ago by russ49.
     
May 03, 2016 20:40 |  #410

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7247/26802708625_a5ba2d607a_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GQsT​tX  (external link) DSC_0509gmpsz (external link) by rus49 (external link), on Flickr

SX10is, S90, d5100 (35mm1.8, 18-55mm, 55-200mm), d750 (28-300mm, 50mm 1.8, 35-70mm 2.8, 24-120mm f/4, 85mm 1.8G), EOS-M5 (EF-M 15-45mm, 18-150mm, EF 40mm 2.8), RX10mk4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lapino
Senior Member
Avatar
528 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 157
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Oudenaarde, Belgium
Post edited over 7 years ago by lapino.
     
May 05, 2016 06:17 as a reply to  @ russ49's post |  #411

Happy Puppy

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/05/1/LQ_791286.jpg
Image hosted by forum (791286) © lapino [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/23660915@N07/ (external link)
Gear:
Fuji X-T3 / 18-55 / 23-1.4 / 35-2 / 55-200 / RX100M4
Sony A7III / Tamron 28-75 / 55-1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
May 05, 2016 06:20 |  #412

Great shot!


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
werds
"Yes, Sire. You'll shut your trap!"
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Delaware
     
May 06, 2016 20:28 |  #413

Although I hate doing weird format crops I prefer doing this to remove the clutter from wide angle shots on my zoom. In the first picture that is my daughter on the far left during one of her two dance routines at a recent arts festival performance.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/05/1/LQ_791597.jpg
Image hosted by forum (791597) © werds [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/05/1/LQ_791598.jpg
Image hosted by forum (791598) © werds [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gear: Nikon D750, Nikon D7200, Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS, Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS HSM EX , Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Tamron 28-300mm Di VC PZD, Tamron 16-300mm VC PZD, Tamron 150-600 VC, Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.8, Nikon SB-900
POTN Seller Feedback (and other)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
werds
"Yes, Sire. You'll shut your trap!"
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Delaware
     
May 06, 2016 20:32 |  #414

And these two were from another pair of dances, I just loved the look of each of these particular shots in black and white :) Oddly enough when I had processed them in color I instantly told myself I needed to process them in black and white...

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/05/1/LQ_791599.jpg
Image hosted by forum (791599) © werds [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/05/1/LQ_791600.jpg
Image hosted by forum (791600)
© werds
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
  



Gear: Nikon D750, Nikon D7200, Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS, Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS HSM EX , Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Tamron 28-300mm Di VC PZD, Tamron 16-300mm VC PZD, Tamron 150-600 VC, Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.8, Nikon SB-900
POTN Seller Feedback (and other)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
May 07, 2016 04:47 |  #415

werds wrote in post #17998181 (external link)
Although I hate doing weird format crops I prefer doing this to remove the clutter from wide angle shots on my zoom. In the first picture that is my daughter on the far left during one of her two dance routines at a recent arts festival performance.


Hosted photo: posted by werds in
./showthread.php?p=179​98181&i=i131006606
forum: Nikon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by werds in
./showthread.php?p=179​98181&i=i44746795
forum: Nikon Digital Cameras

Non-standard format it might be but that first one is a great shot


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ49
Senior Member
605 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 275
Joined Nov 2009
     
May 08, 2016 05:31 |  #416

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7516/26819257941_6259033c91_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GRVH​1Z  (external link) DSC_1265whtFlwr (external link) by rus49 (external link), on Flickr

SX10is, S90, d5100 (35mm1.8, 18-55mm, 55-200mm), d750 (28-300mm, 50mm 1.8, 35-70mm 2.8, 24-120mm f/4, 85mm 1.8G), EOS-M5 (EF-M 15-45mm, 18-150mm, EF 40mm 2.8), RX10mk4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
werds
"Yes, Sire. You'll shut your trap!"
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Delaware
     
May 20, 2016 21:14 |  #417

werds wrote in post #17991769 (external link)
Well that is a thing that I find odd about the two. When using the D7200 outdoors I like the white balance MUCH more, but whenever the light becomes challenging or you have an odd mixture of lighting the D750 nails the white balance much better if sometimes slightly warm by 100 to 300 (on the 1000k scale). I think the reason for that is that the D750 has a slightly upgraded system for WB that when you have a wilder array of challenging colors it gets closer to correct, sometimes it is still out to left field wrong but more often than not I am impressed by how close large batches of shots are... The D7200 on the other hand gets more spot on in outdoors stuff that I have done and when the lighting isn't challenging.

But that is just my personal preference since I know that there is no one "correct" balance and even then my taste on correct white balance continues to change over time!

Following up on my post - apparently I was wrong - it looks like sometimes it is 1k warmer! Here are two example shots. Note I took both my cameras to a performance my daughter's dance company was putting on. I used my D750 and had someone else shooting the D7200 - both cameras were set to auto white balance, obviously Tamron and Sigma lenses will render differently and because it is FF vs crop there is a minor difference - but this is specific to the question of white balance.

I exported from lightroom with no major tweaks (I have a base preset that Lightroom applies but it does not touch white balance, merely some minor color tweaks to make it look close to Camera Normal profile with lens correction and chromatic aberration removal).

As you notice the D7200 shoots cooler than the D750 and when I compared all the shots in the series this remained the same. Obviously there are some uncontrolled variables here due to us both being at different angles, different body lens combo and slightly different settings but overall I think this shows what I mean about how one being cooler the other being warmer - kind of personal preference. I chose these two because they were the most closely timed shots with similar angles to display the white balance difference.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/05/3/LQ_794266.jpg
Image hosted by forum (794266) © werds [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/05/3/LQ_794267.jpg
Image hosted by forum (794267) © werds [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gear: Nikon D750, Nikon D7200, Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS, Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS HSM EX , Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Tamron 28-300mm Di VC PZD, Tamron 16-300mm VC PZD, Tamron 150-600 VC, Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.8, Nikon SB-900
POTN Seller Feedback (and other)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
May 20, 2016 22:42 |  #418

Interesting results


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ptcanon3ti
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,112 posts
Gallery: 670 photos
Best ofs: 16
Likes: 12095
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NJ
     
May 20, 2016 22:44 |  #419

werds wrote in post #18013718 (external link)
Following up on my post - apparently I was wrong - it looks like sometimes it is 1k warmer! Here are two example shots. Note I took both my cameras to a performance my daughter's dance company was putting on. I used my D750 and had someone else shooting the D7200 - both cameras were set to auto white balance, obviously Tamron and Sigma lenses will render differently and because it is FF vs crop there is a minor difference - but this is specific to the question of white balance.

I exported from lightroom with no major tweaks (I have a base preset that Lightroom applies but it does not touch white balance, merely some minor color tweaks to make it look close to Camera Normal profile with lens correction and chromatic aberration removal).

As you notice the D7200 shoots cooler than the D750 and when I compared all the shots in the series this remained the same. Obviously there are some uncontrolled variables here due to us both being at different angles, different body lens combo and slightly different settings but overall I think this shows what I mean about how one being cooler the other being warmer - kind of personal preference. I chose these two because they were the most closely timed shots with similar angles to display the white balance difference.

Just wondering the reason for auto WB.


Paul
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/petshots/ (external link)
Body - Nikon D750
Lenses - Nikon 20 f1.8 / Nikon 16-35 f4 / Sigma 105 OS Macro / Sigma 24-105 f4 Art / Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC / Sigma 150-600 "S"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
werds
"Yes, Sire. You'll shut your trap!"
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Delaware
Post edited over 7 years ago by werds. (4 edits in all)
     
May 20, 2016 22:57 |  #420

ptcanon3ti wrote in post #18013793 (external link)
Just wondering the reason for auto WB.

Shooting in RAW for one, so setting the correct white balance in post isn't a biggie. For two, on the other side of the lens I had my 3-year-old that I was wrangling as well as assisting my wife with some dance outfits and makeup kits while the older child was doing her routines. So no real time to play around with my settings other than basic stuff although I did do a quick test and when set to cloudy it was way too warm for my liking and didn't have time to fiddle further before the performance went on (and they did the routines back to back with little transition time).

As an added note, my white balance preference is usually just slightly warmer than the D7200 outputs so usually correcting the WB in LR is fairly easy as far as batches go (thank goodness for Sync!) ....I will add that I am a rank amateur and learning on the fly with very small time windows to devote to what I learn and love, one thing I did get out of this is that if I ever do choose to take pictures with two different model bodies I will definitely be setting the white balance to one base across both that way I can remove the need to tweak too much on variation.

In this case I was sticking to what I know and at the same time when I was out there I remembered this post and thought it would be a cool little test of the AWB since usually I am using only one or the other, never both at the same time :) (PS my wife just weighed in over my shoulder and she prefers the AWB on the D750 more lol )


Gear: Nikon D750, Nikon D7200, Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS, Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS HSM EX , Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1, Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Tamron 28-300mm Di VC PZD, Tamron 16-300mm VC PZD, Tamron 150-600 VC, Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.8, Nikon SB-900
POTN Seller Feedback (and other)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

241,345 views & 337 likes for this thread, 67 members have posted to it and it is followed by 42 members.
D750 Owners Group!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Nikon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mvetrano2
882 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.