on Smugmug
Jan 16, 2016 22:23 | #211 on Smugmug"No matter where you go, there you are" Buckaroo Banzai
LOG IN TO REPLY |
x.pozhr Goldmember  More info | Apr 22, 2016 12:35 | #212 What’s the reason this thread isn’t very active?!! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 22, 2016 17:14 | #213 p360 wrote in post #17980967 What’s the reason this thread isn’t very active?!! lack of owners :P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras  More info | Taking the 16-35 to Iceland in three weeks. Hopefully when I get back I can put something on this thread. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 22, 2016 19:06 | #215 it's because so many wide angle options IMO Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peeler Senior Member  More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Peeler. | Apr 26, 2016 23:08 | #216 I lucked out and found this lens at my local Best Buy last Friday. I used it the following day on a scheduled shoot in a cramp garage. I couldn't be happier with its performance. It's so much sharper than my Canon 16-35 f4 IS and I wish I would have upgraded sooner! 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Awesome imagery and the 16-34/4 shines in your hands! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 27, 2016 08:27 | #218 Peeler wrote in post #17986502 I lucked out and found this lens at my local Best Buy last Friday. I used it the following day on a scheduled shoot in a cramp garage. I couldn't be happier with its performance. It's so much sharper than my Canon 16-35 f4 IS and I wish I would have upgraded sooner! The Canon is very sensitive to adapter quality due to the floating focus elements. Many of the adapters are actually made too short to ensure infinity focus but this causes pretty significant problems near the edge of the frame for lenses like the 16-35 F/4 IS. Having owned both, the Sony is a solid lens but the Canon is definitely sharper. Bodies: X-T1, E-M1ii, G9 Lenses: µ.Z 7-14 2.8, µ.Z 12-40 2.8, µ.Z 25 1.2, X 18-55 2.8-4, µ.Z 40-150 2.8, µ.Z 45 1.2, µ.Z 60 2.8, µ.Z 75 1.8, PL 200 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peeler Senior Member More info | Apr 27, 2016 09:59 | #219 The Canon 16-35 f4 wasn't bad, but this Sony is much better in my opinion. The Sony seems much sharper in the corners and has less distortion on the wide end. Maybe I have a bad copy of the Canon lens. I used it a lot with my old Canon 6D before switching to my A7rII.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 27, 2016 11:25 | #220 Peeler wrote in post #17986919 The Canon 16-35 f4 wasn't bad, but this Sony is much better in my opinion. The Sony seems much sharper in the corners and has less distortion on the wide end. Maybe I have a bad copy of the Canon lens. I used it a lot with my old Canon 6D before switching to my A7rII. It's your camera body, the A7rii is a significant step up from the 6D. I've been reworking my library, including the 6D images, and it doesnt have the bite of the A7rii. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SeattleSpeedster Goldmember  More info | May 12, 2016 16:55 | #221 Two from this morning in WA  Image hosted by forum (792784) © SeattleSpeedster [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (792785) © SeattleSpeedster [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Fuji GFX100s and A7R II | Zeiss 85mm f1.4 Otus and 28mm f1.4 Otus | Fuji GF23mm, GF45-100mm and GF32-64mm | Canon 200mm f1.8 Canon 70-200mm 2.8 ii | Zeiss 100-300mm | Zeiss 16-35mm f4 | Zeiss 135mm f2 | Zeiss and Sony 50mm f1.4 | Mavic 3 Pro and Inspire 2 X7 drones | https://mikereidphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 12, 2016 22:34 | #222 SeattleSpeedster wrote in post #18004932 Two from this morning in WA 
 Hosted photo: posted by SeattleSpeedster in ./showthread.php?p=18004932&i=i253030063 forum: Sony Lenses 
Hosted photo: posted by SeattleSpeedster in ./showthread.php?p=18004932&i=i77259814 forum: Sony Lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
banhbaochiendon Member 95 posts Likes: 145 Joined Oct 2013 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by banhbaochiendon. | May 16, 2016 09:24 | #223 |
SeattleSpeedster Goldmember More info | May 17, 2016 19:30 | #224 in Mount Rainier National Park this morning... 
Fuji GFX100s and A7R II | Zeiss 85mm f1.4 Otus and 28mm f1.4 Otus | Fuji GF23mm, GF45-100mm and GF32-64mm | Canon 200mm f1.8 Canon 70-200mm 2.8 ii | Zeiss 100-300mm | Zeiss 16-35mm f4 | Zeiss 135mm f2 | Zeiss and Sony 50mm f1.4 | Mavic 3 Pro and Inspire 2 X7 drones | https://mikereidphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SeattleSpeedster Goldmember More info | May 19, 2016 20:17 | #225 pano of seattle using several 35mm shots  Image hosted by forum (794083) © SeattleSpeedster [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Fuji GFX100s and A7R II | Zeiss 85mm f1.4 Otus and 28mm f1.4 Otus | Fuji GF23mm, GF45-100mm and GF32-64mm | Canon 200mm f1.8 Canon 70-200mm 2.8 ii | Zeiss 100-300mm | Zeiss 16-35mm f4 | Zeiss 135mm f2 | Zeiss and Sony 50mm f1.4 | Mavic 3 Pro and Inspire 2 X7 drones | https://mikereidphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1956 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
