AFJ?
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2739 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Jun 14, 2016 19:58 | #31 ![]() AFJ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Left Handed Brisket Combating camera shame since 1977... ![]() More info | Jun 14, 2016 20:01 | #32 ed rader wrote in post #18039466 ![]() now the AFJ think all filters are evil and will look for any opportunity to pontificate but I've made my case for using protective filters. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2016 20:51 | #33 what's the point here? He scratched his lens Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Left Handed Brisket Combating camera shame since 1977... ![]() More info Post edited over 4 years ago by Left Handed Brisket. | Jun 14, 2016 21:02 | #34 Charlie wrote in post #18039651 ![]() what's the point here? He scratched his lens really? PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2016 21:41 | #35 Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #18039663 ![]() really? "I may have hit the filter with another lens or camera when I put it in my bag" ≠ seven blows with the claw end of a hammer it really doesnt need to scratch the lens, loss of coating would cost the same for a element replacement. Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used" ![]() More info Post edited over 4 years ago by MalVeauX. | Jun 14, 2016 22:05 | #36 Great summer troll thread!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tom Reichner Cream of the Crop ![]() 15,642 posts Gallery: 170 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 5646 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, now in Washington state, road trip back and forth a lot, with extensive detouring More info Post edited over 4 years ago by Tom Reichner. (4 edits in all) | Jun 15, 2016 11:18 | #37 MalVeauX wrote in post #18039723 ![]() Great summer troll thread! ![]() Really though, it was busted in a bag on a boat. Which really raises a big question... how was a well packed stash of this equipment banging around each other in a packed bag? Filters bust from nearly anything. Showing a busted filter doesn't mean much, other than you found it that way--don't even know what tapped it or compressed it, in a packed bag no less. I guess that some people like to protect their lenses by putting them in a cushioned padded case of some sort so that they can''t bump into other lenses while in the bag. "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know? ![]() More info |
Jun 15, 2016 11:57 | #40 The hood might have helped in this situation. Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canonuser123 Senior Member ![]() More info | Jun 15, 2016 12:44 | #41 eddieb1 wrote in post #18038212 ![]() Except for the fact Ginger was HOT!!!!!!! Mary Ann and yes to filters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GregDunn Goldmember ![]() 1,289 posts Likes: 129 Joined Mar 2013 Location: Indiana More info | Jun 15, 2016 15:20 | #42 I always put any lens in a padded pocket in my bag - which was once kicked over by someone while I was taking the camera out, causing my 17-55 to fly 3 feet to the concrete. The filter glass was totally destroyed and the rim bent to the extent that I had to remove it with a pair of small pliers to avoid damaging the lens filter threads. The replacement filter threaded on with no problem. Both filters were high end Hoya HMC units, so they weren't cheap junk. Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yes. that's why I had to replace the front element on the last 24-70LII the coatings got destroyed by cleaning. it was so bad and had a spidery appearance and I thought it might be fungus but it was coating damage. really puzzled me because I've never had that problem with any lens before. and I was getting weird flaring under some conditions. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
you can believe what you want. I've made my case. we differ on many things anyway and you appear to have more time to talk then I do. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
my bag is domke f1-x not real padded but spacious. you don't shoot anything but wildlife by your own admission so how much gear do you carry. it's nice to have the luxuries but it's not always possible for me and I accept that damage will occur. so yeah were all different http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is henseman1 857 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |