Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 15 Jun 2016 (Wednesday) 07:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Emily with sunglasses

 
this thread is locked
Jeff_56
Senior Member
285 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2013
Location: SE Ohio
Post edited over 6 years ago by Jeff_56.
     
Jun 15, 2016 07:05 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

IMAGE: http://www.a-framevideo.com/Emily%20with%20sunglasses-2b.jpg


This is my daughter.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10448
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Jun 15, 2016 15:08 |  #2

She is indeed wearing sunglasses. However, they're crooked.

This appears to be a crop from a larger image. Yes?


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff_56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2013
Location: SE Ohio
     
Jun 15, 2016 15:51 as a reply to  @ saea501's post |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Yes they're crooked. This was a capture of real action. It wasn't posed. Yes it was cropped from a larger image but the noise you're seeing is from where I over processed the image trying to get the color from her hair to show up better. The light wasn't good so the color wasn't good. I know it's noisy but for an image that would be printed out in a 5 x 8 form and hung on a wall where people wouldn't be looking close it would work for me. Stand back from your computer and you'll get the idea. The image wasn't that much bigger but of course it was reduced to work on this web page. Still there is noise and it's from trying to crank up the color. I like it this way. Some may not. The thing is trying to get red hair like hers requires bright light which causes her skin to be blown out. It's tricky. But I think this works for an image that won't have people standing right on top of it looking. If I hung it on a wall in a smaller size and away from where people could get a close look I think it works well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GBolink
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: The Netherlands
     
Jun 15, 2016 16:02 |  #4

Test




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,668 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Southen Arizona
Post edited over 6 years ago by AZGeorge.
     
Jun 15, 2016 20:13 |  #5

Hello, Jeff.

You might consider just processing the hair to fit your intent.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/06/3/LQ_798810.jpg
Image hosted by forum (798810) © AZGeorge [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff_56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2013
Location: SE Ohio
     
Jun 15, 2016 20:37 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Creating a mask to just adjust only her hair would be very difficult. Trust me I use masks often to work on photos but this one isn't a good candidate for it plus her skin was pretty dark in the original. Combining that with brighter hair just wouldn't look right IMO.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff_56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2013
Location: SE Ohio
     
Jun 15, 2016 21:48 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

OK since people don't seem to like the way this turned out I thought I would try again. For one thing I've been working with HDR for a short time and it shows in these images. I think this one is cleaner than the first but it still has issues. I do think HDR is a direction to go. I've had really good luck with it on other images. Skin is clearly another thing. Anyway here's my new try at it and the original I started with.

IMAGE: http://www.a-framevideo.com/Emily%20with%20sunglasses-1-HDR1-1.jpg


IMAGE: http://www.a-framevideo.com/Emily%20with%20sunglasses-1b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
d750guy
Junior Member
26 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Nov 2015
Location: Sacramento
Post edited over 6 years ago by d750guy.
     
Jun 15, 2016 22:19 |  #8

I fixed her glasses and added some levels adjustment.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/06/3/LQ_798834.jpg
Image hosted by forum (798834) © d750guy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff_56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2013
Location: SE Ohio
Post edited over 6 years ago by Jeff_56.
     
Jun 15, 2016 22:59 as a reply to  @ d750guy's post |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

LOL nice job fixing the glasses but it still has an artificial look to it. No big deal. I just thought it was a good photo of her but needed some tweaking. It's not easy to create light where there was none. BTW I tried adjusting the levels in the first attempt but the more I mucked with it the more noise showed up. I tried to limit the adjustments on the second go.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Jun 15, 2016 23:59 |  #10

d750guy wrote in post #18040729 (external link)
I fixed her glasses and added some levels adjustment.

Hosted photo: posted by d750guy in
./showthread.php?p=180​40729&i=i30243679
forum: People

What did you do to her mouth though? You're making her look like the Joker!


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10448
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Jun 16, 2016 06:31 |  #11

flowrider wrote in post #18040830 (external link)
What did you do to her mouth though? You're making her look like the Joker!

I was wondering the same thing. Looks kind of weird.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
01Ryan10
Goldmember
1,115 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 3200
Joined Aug 2012
Location: OC, California
     
Jun 16, 2016 10:16 |  #12

A lovely girl; however, it looks like a smartphone snapshot.


http://RyanLunaPhotogr​aphy.com (external link)
IG: @01ryanluna10 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff_56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2013
Location: SE Ohio
Post edited over 6 years ago by Jeff_56.
     
Jun 16, 2016 10:55 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

it looks like a smartphone snapshot

Did you look at the original? It isn't a smartphone photo. I shot it with my Canon DSLR. The light just wasn't there for a good quality photo. I could have set the exposure I suppose but I was just shooting family members at a reunion when I shot this. It isn't a posed shot. She's sitting under an arbor so she's sitting in a shadow with a sunlit background. The camera adapted for the background and the result was a photo without enough light. I've been experimenting with HDR for one thing and that has created a good deal of the noise. I had much better luck with landscapes in HDR. Still it did add light that even Lightroom couldn't do. I tried that first.

It is what it is - an under exposed image with an attempt to bring out the natural color of my daughter's hair. It added a lot of noise especially to her skin.

The photo would still work well as a 5X8 hung on a wall where people wouldn't be standing too close. The noise isn't noticeable from a short distance away but the hair color is. So I like it. Photography isn't always about the perfectly shot image. It's about capturing a moment too. And sometimes that means just doing the best you can.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DThriller
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 3030
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Rhode Island
     
Jun 16, 2016 12:14 |  #14

Jeff_56 wrote in post #18041212 (external link)
The light just wasn't there for a good quality photo.

Them's quiting words! Find it or make it! You can do it


http://www.facebook.co​m/DPhillipsStudios (external link)
http://DPhillipsStudio​s.com (external link)
@DPhillipsStudios
YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.co​m …/UCgAZ5-OKdg1YXONAjGu91zQ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff_56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2013
Location: SE Ohio
Post edited over 6 years ago by Jeff_56.
     
Jun 16, 2016 13:08 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

LOL yeah I can but I wasn't shooting for the sake of a great photo. It was a family thing. Trust me I know how to work the light kit I have. But if you want to work on the original and show me how it can be done in post feel free. Again I worked on it with Lightroom but there's only so far you can go with that before you get the same problem of noise.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,254 views & 5 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it and it is followed by 7 members.
Emily with sunglasses
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Dannal01
825 guests, 190 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.