Scoobert wrote in post #18044337
You can try the BS play on words all you want. Your whole purpose of posting in this thread was to compare him to a guy that just ripped somebody off. While you dont have the cojones to flat out say it, you just want to hint at it.
If you are going to call out somebody at least man up and say it instead of just insinuating it then crawling back under your bridge.
Yes I would drive four hours for a sale of that magnitude. Actually I would prefer it. With Paypal (who I love) you are at risk as a seller because they almost always side with the buyer. Its the reason many people don't take it is because its so easy to reverse on the transaction. You could even meet in person and buy something with paypal then reverse the charges on the way home with your new lens.
Just for the record I was a serious buyer and agreed to pay seller the $650.00 which I have to admit is a price to good to be true, check with Talley. The seller has two
threads I replied to this one not the one Scoobert is citing had I viewed that one would not have bothered. Now look at the two threads posted about an hour apart.
First one which I didn't see the lens is $750 on this one its originally $650 oops that a typo should have been $675. Scoobert I'm sure you have a explanation for the
three price variations.