I'm waiting for the Laowa Venus Optics 12 2.8 Zero-Distortion to sell my Canon 16-35 f4L IS, and you ?
As far as I know no 24-70 2.8 Art, 85 1.4 Art, 135 2 Art OS have been announced yet ? So for the rest nothing particular atm.
CanonYouCan Goldmember ![]() More info Post edited over 4 years ago by CanonYouCan. (2 edits in all) | Jul 05, 2016 18:21 | #1 I'm waiting for the Laowa Venus Optics 12 2.8 Zero-Distortion to sell my Canon 16-35 f4L IS, and you ? Sony A7 III | Metabones V | Canon 16-35 F4 L | Sigma 85 1.4 Art | 70-200 2.8L II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used" ![]() More info | Jul 05, 2016 18:40 | #2 Hrm,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Perfectly Frank I'm too sexy for my lens More info Post edited over 4 years ago by Perfectly Frank. | Jul 05, 2016 19:22 | #3 It's not an announced lens, just a rumor. But I'm waiting for more info about Canon's 200-600 lens. When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2016 19:47 | #4 Sold my Sigma 85 a few weeks ago in anticipation for the Art replacement. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
madhatter04 Goldmember 1,930 posts Likes: 51 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Southern California More info | Jul 05, 2016 19:51 | #5 Holding out for a Sigma 85 or 135 ART lens to complete my lens collection. Designer // Art Director // Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson ![]() More info | Jul 05, 2016 21:49 | #6 waiting for the siggy 85 Art. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mannetti21 Goldmember ![]() More info | Jul 05, 2016 22:08 | #7 135L f/2 IS...my life would be complete ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mannetti21 Goldmember ![]() More info | Jul 05, 2016 22:37 | #9 DreDaze wrote in post #18059028 ![]() are any of these lenses actually announced? I talked to a friend who knows a guy that delivers office stationary to the Canon service center in NJ and he heard they were working on a new lens. Clearly he was talking about the 135L f/2 IS...but I'm not sure if the other lenses mentioned have been officially announced from any reliable source. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2016 22:58 | #10 I might look at Canon's 16-35 f/2.8L III if it arrives as rumors predict. Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid ![]() More info | Jul 05, 2016 23:27 | #11 mannetti21 wrote in post #18059046 ![]() I talked to a friend who knows a guy that delivers office stationary to the Canon service center in NJ and he heard they were working on a new lens. Clearly he was talking about the 135L f/2 IS...but I'm not sure if the other lenses mentioned have been officially announced from any reliable source. the only new lenses canonrumors talks about coming out this year are the 16-35f2.8III, 70-300IS II, and a 24-105IS II Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 06, 2016 00:16 | #12 mannetti21 wrote in post #18059016 ![]() 135L f/2 IS...my life would be complete that's what I said too, but not really. The lens is still kinda big. On the A7rii, the 135L is stabilized, and quite frankly a beast of a lens, and really good...... just wish it was smaller, like 100 f2 smaller. That's my threshold on lens sizes. I still use the 135 plenty but would really love it if it were smaller. Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smythie I wasn't even trying More info | Jul 06, 2016 00:37 | #13 whichever way you look at it a 135 f/2 lens is going to have a front element at least 65mm in diameter, quite likely a 72mm filter thread at the smallest. If a smaller lens is desired you need to look for something with a smaller diameter aperture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 06, 2016 01:00 | #14 smythie wrote in post #18059128 ![]() whichever way you look at it a 135 f/2 lens is going to have a front element at least 65mm in diameter, quite likely a 72mm filter thread at the smallest. If a smaller lens is desired you need to look for something with a smaller diameter aperture I would be ok with 72mm filter as long as it's shorter, even 13cm (from sensor) lens I'm ok with. Long lenses are harder to fit in the bags I have. Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bildeb0rg Goldmember ![]() 3,339 posts Gallery: 465 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 3305 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Dumfries and Galloway in Scotland More info | Jul 06, 2016 02:15 | #15 As above, 24-105L ii. Perfik on a 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Thomas Jake 583 guests, 185 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |