Sony A7x lounge

Thank you Gene for the info. I use both Flickr and Smugmug. I tend to think Flickr over sharpens and under exposes any shared images just a bit. Have not seen that with Smugmug.

What's the benefit of paying for flickr? I know with smugmug, you can sell stuff (however I think the words smug mug are a terrible name for a site).

Charlie wrote in post #18073602
What's the benefit of paying for flickr? I know with smugmug, you can sell stuff (however I think the words smug mug are a terrible name for a site).

Yes, Flickr sounds much more professional.

Here is the differences in Flickr's free subscription and the paid Pro subscription.

I noticed that there is minimal EXIF data on the last two images I posted on Flickr and I pay (annually). So, I don't think it's to do with Pro or no. I am still getting stats though.

Basically flickr Pro gives you stats and the free one doesnt. The other benefits are just padding. It says ad free for paid but ive never seen an ad on the free account.

With regards to exif its odd whats going on. I checked Genes link there and cant see exif on his zippo photo. Can someone click my flickr link below and tell me if they see exif (mine is free account), Skip the first photo of the watch as the exif is missing as its a manual lens.

AnnieMacD wrote in post #18073680
I noticed that there is minimal EXIF data on the last two images I posted on Flickr and I pay (annually). So, I don't think it's to do with Pro or no. I am still getting stats though.

same here. No EXIF and I have a pro account.

xpfloyd wrote in post #18073695
Basically flickr Pro gives you stats and the free one doesnt. The other benefits are just padding. It says ad free for paid but ive never seen an ad on the free account.

With regards to exif its odd whats going on. I checked Genes link there and cant see exif on his zippo photo. Can someone click my flickr link below and tell me if they see exif (mine is free account), Skip the first photo of the watch as the exif is missing as its a manual lens.

Yes, Eddie, the EXIF is there on your last photo of Callum. But this only started for me in the last few days and you posted that one a while ago. Try posting a new photo to really test it.

Ok a few from the trip. I thought the CV10mm would come out of the bag more often but 90% of the time the Loxia 21 was stuck on the A7rii and I love it. SO easy to use and am not missing AF at all.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/KbnS​sE

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Jpdm​oF

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/JpbN​cu

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/KdJm​yM

AnnieMacD wrote in post #18073720
Yes, Eddie, the EXIF is there on your last photo of Callum. But this only started for me in the last few days and you posted that one a while ago. Try posting a new photo to really test it.

Good point annie, I'll try a new photo, if they have decided to stop showing exif that's a really odd decision!

navydoc wrote in post #18073648
Yes, Flickr sounds much more professional.

Here is the differences in Flickr's free subscription and the paid Pro subscription.

Hosted photo: posted by navydoc in
./showthread.php?p=180​73648&i=i2529484
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Looks like I need to discontinue my pro account. I initially got it for the extra storage space.

AnnieMacD wrote in post #18073720
Yes, Eddie, the EXIF is there on your last photo of Callum. But this only started for me in the last few days and you posted that one a while ago. Try posting a new photo to really test it.

OK so it's not just me.

mystik610 wrote in post #18073748
Looks like I need to discontinue my pro account. I initially got it for the extra storage space.

If you find a EXIF Flickr solution please PM me.

I have this lens. On a full frame you get the fish eye effect. You won't get that effect on a crop camera. I can't speak to the 8mm on a crop.

One of my great grandsons. Sony a6300 + Batis 25@ f2, iso 640, 1/125th

IMAGE LINK: https://genelewis.smug​mug.com …graphy/People/i​-578xVL3/A

genesimmons wrote in post #18073554
quick question for all u canon glass guys,any one have the canon 15mm f2.8 fish eye,?
i found a used local one for sale,specs say its for full frame cams,as u know i use a fish eye all the time but mine is a crop and i use it on apc.
would i notice much difference in fov using the 8mm in crop or the 15mm full frame,i know the canon is prob better optically and its a faster but would it be worth 300 difference in price? thanx guys

While it is not a full fisheye, it is a sharp little devil. You would lose much of the edges on a crop camera. Worth getting if you have a full frame.