Without going back through the entire thread, are there any landscapers here that have used the camera? And star shots?
AdamJL Goldmember  4,365 posts Likes: 13 Joined May 2006 Location: 'Straya More info | Sep 23, 2016 05:51 | #286 Without going back through the entire thread, are there any landscapers here that have used the camera? And star shots?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike ugly when I'm sober  More info | Not many yet...I'll be getting this soon and night skies is one thing I want to try! www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LJ3Jim Goldmember  More info | Sep 23, 2016 08:43 | #288 AdamJL wrote in post #18137498  Without going back through the entire thread, are there any landscapers here that have used the camera? And star shots? Here's a landscape from yesterday. Mt Shuksan reflected in Picture Lake.  Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike ugly when I'm sober More info | Sep 23, 2016 09:14 | #289 Ooh pretty!! www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 23, 2016 13:12 | #290 With Zeiss 21ZE  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 5D IV, Rokinon 14mm, Zeiss 21mm, Rokinon 24mm 1.4, Canon 24-105L, Speedlight 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cassie Goldmember  More info | Sep 23, 2016 13:27 | #291 Beautiful! http://thompson-photo.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamJL Goldmember 4,365 posts Likes: 13 Joined May 2006 Location: 'Straya More info | Thank you for posting. What's that lens like? I am thinking about getting the upcoming 2.8 16-35 III for stars
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Not sure if you are asking me, but so far the Zeiss 21 has been great. I'm gonna go out Saturday night and do some night pictures with this and the Rokinon 24mm. Hopefully it clears up before then. 5D IV, Rokinon 14mm, Zeiss 21mm, Rokinon 24mm 1.4, Canon 24-105L, Speedlight 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rwolson Member 100 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Lowell, Ma More info | Sep 23, 2016 19:11 | #294 Planning on heading out Saturday night for Milky Way. So far, my limited usage shows the camera's worth an upgrade from my Canon 5d Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 23, 2016 19:37 | #295 Late day shooting at higher ISOs and bad lights. I can hardly get out to do birds any more...  5DmkIV Blue Heron 1 by gabebalazs, on Flickr 5DmkIV Great Egret 4 by gabebalazs, on Flickr 5DmkIV Seagull 1 by gabebalazs, on Flickr 5DmkIV Great Egret 1 by gabebalazs, on Flickr 5DmkIV Blue Heron 2 by gabebalazs, on Flickr 5DmkIV Killdeers by gabebalazs, on Flickr 5DmkIV Great Egret 3 by gabebalazs, on Flickr 5DmkIV Great Egret 2 by gabebalazs, on FlickrSONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Trvlr323 Goldmember  3,297 posts Likes: 1091 Joined Apr 2007 More info | How do you find the AF performance with the Tammy?? Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LJ3Jim Goldmember More info | Sep 23, 2016 20:04 | #297 gabebalazs wrote in post #18138279 I can hardly get out to do birds any more... 5DmkIV Great Egret 2 by gabebalazs, on FlickrYou need to find the time. You're very, very good at it! Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gabebalazs Bird Whisperer  More info Post edited over 4 years ago by gabebalazs. | Sep 23, 2016 20:58 | #298 nqjudo wrote in post #18138281 How do you find the AF performance with the Tammy?? I think it's really good, it's the best of any bodies that I tried with my Tamron, which is about 5-6 different ones (6D, 5D3, 70D, 80D, T4i, and 5D4. Plus Sony A7rII but that's different being mirrorless.) SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IIIMik3 Senior Member  397 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2003 More info Post edited over 4 years ago by IIIMik3. (4 edits in all) | Sep 23, 2016 21:53 | #299 Linked for full size  I'm sure at some point someone will ask why f2.8. Truth is this was just a quick test shot to look at composition. Ended up liking the composition better than the one i actually shot at f8.0. Model Mayhem Profile
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Talley Talley Whacker  More info Post edited over 4 years ago by Talley. | Sep 23, 2016 22:51 | #300 Nothing fancy... taken from the stands tonight. The 1.4xII is actually really really good. Just had to correct some minor CA. I think I'll get the III for the better CA control and much better edges/corner performance.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is Eddy3 675 guests, 328 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
