rejay14 Goldmember  More info | Dec 27, 2016 03:01 | #8041 PExpo wrote in post #18219208  Took Photos of the wife's new hair cut and color  Wife by Pollard Exposures, on Flickr Wife by Pollard Exposures, on FlickrIs the bokeh from the lens or software?? Looks great. If lens, combo please? Cudos 1DX Mark II, 5D Mark IV, 40D,Rebel XT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Niccas9 Senior Member  More info | My guess is that it is the 135L, which is why I am itching to get my hands on one!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scrumhalf Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 27, 2016 16:29 | #8043 rejay14 wrote in post #18224546 Is the bokeh from the lens or software?? Looks great. If lens, combo please? Cudos  Niccas9 wrote in post #18224968 My guess is that it is the 135L, which is why I am itching to get my hands on one! Flickr link says 85/1.2 @ F/1.2. Sam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SereneSpeed Goldmember 1,081 posts Likes: 2534 Joined Jan 2013 More info Post edited over 6 years ago by SereneSpeed. | Dec 28, 2016 11:38 | #8046 PExpo wrote in post #18225588 We typically favor the 135mm I am very curious, having owned the 135 and now looking for an 85mm, what makes you favor the 135? https://www.danbcreative.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 28, 2016 17:20 | #8047 From a recent trip to Iceland  ogledimages848 by Ogle'd Images, on Flickr  ogledimages877 by Ogle'd Images, on FlickrInstaGram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
M_Six Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 28, 2016 17:53 | #8048 ^^^Fantastic images, but standing barefoot on those rocks couldn't have been much fun. Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
don1163 Goldmember  More info | Dec 28, 2016 18:11 | #8050 
1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Very nice Canon 1DIV, 7D gripped, 50D gripped, 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM, 50 f1.4, 85 f1.8, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, 300 f2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The bokeh has a unique look to it compared to other lenses... hard to explain. The auto focus is much faster than the 85 1.2 that we own, which makes it nice for photographing our daughter. And of course, it's the best bang for the buck. We grabbed our 135L for $700... you can't complain about the price to quality comparison. Also, the 135 is lighter in comparison. Husband & Wife Team / Tony & Karissa / flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Niccas9 Senior Member More info | I stand corrected! Should have looked at the EXIF...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is DragonPhotos 1048 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
, 70-200
