Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands 
Thread started 09 Dec 2016 (Friday) 19:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Need a quality camera for hiking

 
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,726 posts
Gallery: 141 photos
Likes: 1452
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Dec 29, 2016 12:28 |  #16

I would either suggest a mirrorless camera or a small dslr with AF micro adjust (canon).

The beauty of mirrorless is that you'll seldom have back/front focus (sony/fuji) If you go micro 4/3 the newer bodies will have very good focus too (panasonic proprietary DFD or olympus hybrid phase detect/contrast detect AF).

I cannot ever buy a dslr with no micro adjust due to the chances of having a lens miss focus due to the tolerance of calibration of the camera body vs lens calibration.

I recently purchases a cheap Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM prime just as a throw around for my 80D. The shaprness at f/1.8 was very good with some AF micro adjusting and reasonably sharp as I moved away from the subject. Testing that same lens with my 5d3 and 5d2 that lens was not as sharp even when micro adjusting and the approximately 7 feet away the test subject was soft and a blur. I returned it happily!!!

With my fuji I've never ever experienced soft images. Extremely spoiled that every lens works perfectly with no focus issues !!!! :)

OP not sure in your area but if your going through the troubles of saving weight mirrorless is the way to go. If you just want a smaller dlsr I am extremely pleased with the IQ I am getting with my 80D. Slightly larger than a rebel series but the performance is incredible.

If your not using flash I'll have to say my fuji with 18-55 kit lens ($1000 range) would surpass the IQ of a high percentage of older gen canon crop sensors with $$$ lenses. I still feel the IQ from my 80D with 16-35 f/2.8mk2 is not as good as my fuji with kit lens!!!


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarvis ­ Creative ­ Studios
Goldmember
Avatar
2,429 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 897
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Johnson City, Tennessee
     
Dec 29, 2016 13:21 |  #17

Have you considered a one size fits all camera? I've heard really good things about the Sony RX-10 series. A RX-10 II can be had for relatively cheap I would guess. And the RX10-III while a bit more expensive would provide much more reach. They both have amazing video features as well if you're into that. Would save on weight too.


WEBSITE (external link)
flickr (external link)
Sony HX90V || Sony a6500 || Sony a9 || Sony E 10-18 f4 OSS || Sony FE 24-70 f2.8 GM || Sony Sonnar T* FE 35 f2.8 ZA || Sony Sonnar T* FE 55 f1.8 ZA || Sony FE 70-200 f2.8 GM OSS || Sony FE 200-600 f5.6-6.3 G OSS || Godox speedlights and strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
20,880 posts
Gallery: 1926 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 70521
Joined Jul 2013
     
Jan 13, 2017 02:01 |  #18

I've got over 4000 miles logged backpacking, and at my age the feet/knees/lower back to prove it.
OP mentioned wanting interchangeable lenses and for me that has historically been a Pandora's box of
just one more lens, and another, and another.
Youth and strength must be added into your equation and what ultimate image quality you desire compared
to the amount of weight you want to suffer.

For years I backpacked with a Nikon F2 Photomic :( In a not too distant past I'd settled on mFT and three lenses.

We have a hike coming up in February, full winter on with temps expected to be 5F and below....obviously my priorities
will be warmth and not picture IQ.
For that hike it will be an RX100v, a Sony HX80, and a super dinky travel tripod for the group photo.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snegron
Senior Member
296 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Florida
     
Jan 14, 2017 17:40 |  #19

For years I tried searching for the perfect lightweight camera set up for travel/biking. I was never happy with m4/3 after trying Olympus and Panasonic cameras.

I ended up going with a Canon T3i outfit. The Nikon D3000/5000 series dslr's are even lighter. The IQ from any crop sensor, entry level dslr camera is vastly superior (imo) than any m4/3 or smaller sensor camera out there. Also, entry level dslr outfits are sometimes less expensive than offerings from m4/3 outfits.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
Avatar
4,204 posts
Gallery: 803 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 10017
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Applecross, Scotland
     
Jan 14, 2017 18:07 |  #20

One more view from another person who had the same issues with balancing weight/performance.

I am pretty invested in the Canon system and had a 5D3 which was far too heavy. I bought a 100D (SL1) and 3 STM lenses (24mm, 40mm and 50mm). This is a neat lightweight system but I was never satisfied with it. The 100D is terrible for ISO > 400, changing lenses was a nightmare in the wind and rain on the Scottish hills and I was constantly having to take multiple images and stitch them in post as the 24mm on crop just wasn't wide enough. So I sold all the STM lenses and bought a 6D and 24-70mm L f/4 and have never looked back. In fact the combo rolled down a hill and only stopped when it hit a rock. The 6D survived but the lens did not, so I bought another one. The combo is that good IMHO. In addition the lens has a Macro function (not true macro) which is so useful if you are out in the wild. I carry a small tripod and the small IR remote control and that's all I need. Of course the lens is used on my other cameras as well and the 6D is used as a second camera for weddings. I wouldn't be without it.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,350 views & 7 likes for this thread
Need a quality camera for hiking
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Wierdninja
825 guests, 202 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.