Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Apr 2014 (Wednesday) 23:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is it possible to adapt Fujinon XF lenses to Canon?

 
Lyle ­ Krannichfeld
Senior Member
399 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 124
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Apr 30, 2014 23:46 |  #1

Hi there,

The new 16mm 1.4 Fujinon XF that was just announced is looking to be a pretty spectacular star lens thus far, assuming the coma and such is under control.

My question is this...is it possible to adapt this lens for use on our Canon systems? I'm not up to speed on the adapter world, beyond using the M42 lenses.

Thanks in advance!

Lyle


Fine Art Landscape/Wildlife Photographer on Maui: INSTAGRAM (external link) FACEBOOK (external link)
Tonga tours to swim with the Humpbacks: AUMAKUA TOURS (external link)
Sony A7R IV, A7RIII, 12-24G, 16-35GM, 50 1.4ZA, 85 1.4GM, Voigt 65, Laowa 100 2:1 macro
DJI Inspire 2 with X7 and 16, 24, 35, 50

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4606
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Apr 30, 2014 23:51 |  #2

The lens is designed to cover a m4/3rd sensor with no mirror (meaning very short registry distance) so I'm gonna say no on this one. The registry distance alone between the m4/3 format and the Canon EF is just too much, then add in the smaller image circle. . . . . .

edit: forgot it's APS-C, still I think the vast difference in registry distance would kill that idea.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,007 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5394
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
May 01, 2014 12:20 |  #3

Not possible. You could put it on an EOS M if they made an adapter (which they don't that I'm aware of), but other than that it wouldn't work.

Assuming you'd want to put this on your 7D (it for sure wouldn't fit your 6D even if it were a DSLR lens), have you looked at the Sigma 18-35/1.8? Nearly as fast and more versatile.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyle ­ Krannichfeld
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
399 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 124
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Kihei, HI
     
May 01, 2014 14:30 |  #4

It would be for my 6D. That Sigma is a nice lens on the 7d, agreed.


Fine Art Landscape/Wildlife Photographer on Maui: INSTAGRAM (external link) FACEBOOK (external link)
Tonga tours to swim with the Humpbacks: AUMAKUA TOURS (external link)
Sony A7R IV, A7RIII, 12-24G, 16-35GM, 50 1.4ZA, 85 1.4GM, Voigt 65, Laowa 100 2:1 macro
DJI Inspire 2 with X7 and 16, 24, 35, 50

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
May 01, 2014 18:39 |  #5

Fuji use a mirrorless 1.5x crop factor APC-S sensor. The back of the lens needs to be closer to the sensor than the Canon register distance so it wouldn't work. Pretty much why you can't use Canon lenses on a Nikon but you can use Nikon lenses on a Canon.

Yes, the Sigma 18-35 will work on Canon FF. Will vignette wide open but actually clears up after stopping down. You can find examples on Youtube.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DTvn93
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Jan 2017
     
Jan 15, 2017 15:43 |  #6

And what about Fujinon 35 mm 1.4 lens on Canon?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dasmith232
Senior Member
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 381
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Monument, CO, USA
     
Jan 15, 2017 15:57 |  #7

The "flange distance" for Canon EF (or EF-S) is 44mm. This means that the back of the lens needs to be 44mm from the sensor.

When mounting a lens with a *longer* flange distance to a camera, you need to add some amount of (empty) space. If mounting a lens with a *shorter* distance, you need to do with with some kind of corrective optics.

I can mount my Canon lenses to a Sony E-mount body because the Sony has an 18mm distance. So my adapter is 26mm thick to fill in the difference.

The Fuji X mount distance is 17.7mm. So you need to *subtract* 26.3mm from the setup if you want to mount your Fuji lens to a Canon. I don't know of any adapters that do that.


Dave
Mostly using Canon bodies with lots of different lenses and flash.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DTvn93
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Jan 2017
Post edited over 6 years ago by DTvn93.
     
Jan 15, 2017 18:00 as a reply to  @ dasmith232's post |  #8

Thank for your answer. I'm have do research on the internet, but I cant find any adapter that use for XF on EOS..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Jan 15, 2017 19:27 |  #9

The reason why mirrorless lenses can be made so fast, sharp and small is because they dont have a mirror in the way. Since your 6D has a mirror it it will not adapt.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,007 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5394
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
Post edited over 6 years ago by EverydayGetaway.
     
Jan 15, 2017 22:55 |  #10

DTvn93 wrote in post #18245465 (external link)
Thank for your answer. I'm have do research on the internet, but I cant find any adapter that use for XF on EOS..

That's because one doesn't exist, it's not possible.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dasmith232
Senior Member
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 381
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Monument, CO, USA
     
Jan 16, 2017 07:45 |  #11

EverydayGetaway wrote in post #18245706 (external link)
That's because one doesn't exist, it's not possible.

Agreed, and probably not in a way that would yield a high quality image. Technically, it *could* be possible with some more lens elements inside the adapter. But the optics would not be in the best location on the light path (constrained to being inside the adapter).

Therefore if such a device did exist, the quality wouldn't be great and there wouldn't be a market demand.

I only mention this because there are other cases of wanting to adapt shorter flange lenses and adapters have been created in those cases. (Again, compromised image quality.)


Dave
Mostly using Canon bodies with lots of different lenses and flash.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,607 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8338
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
Post edited over 6 years ago by Tom Reichner. (3 edits in all)
     
Jan 17, 2017 13:27 |  #12

.

Yeah, old thread, OP has moved on, etc. So what! I still want to make a point.

Lyle Krannichfeld wrote in post #16875336 (external link)
It would be for my 6D.

But that doesn't make any sense........it'd be like putting an EF-S lens on a full frame body.

Even if the lens could mount to the camera and not have any mirror issues, you are still left with a tiny little image circle that doesn't cover the full frame sensor. You would get photos that look like this:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/01/3/LQ_835341.jpg
Image hosted by forum (835341) © Tom Reichner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

I just don't understand why you would want such a thing. What good is a wide angle if so much of the field of view is all blacked out?

.

.

"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dasmith232
Senior Member
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 381
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Monument, CO, USA
     
Jan 17, 2017 20:45 as a reply to  @ Tom Reichner's post |  #13

They *do* make adapters to put shorter-flange lenses on a body. I could for example get one that would allow me to mount my old Minolta MD lenses to my Canon body. I won't, but I could. The corrective element will expand the image circle to fill the frame. But the optical quality will suffer. Plus, not all combinations are even made. I don't see anything for Fuji to Canon.


Dave
Mostly using Canon bodies with lots of different lenses and flash.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,007 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5394
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Jan 17, 2017 22:38 |  #14

dasmith232 wrote in post #18247806 (external link)
They *do* make adapters to put shorter-flange lenses on a body. I could for example get one that would allow me to mount my old Minolta MD lenses to my Canon body. I won't, but I could. The corrective element will expand the image circle to fill the frame. But the optical quality will suffer. Plus, not all combinations are even made. I don't see anything for Fuji to Canon.

The difference between MD and EF mount isn't very large to begin with, the difference in flange distance between a mirrorless or rangefinder lens compared to any SLR lens is huge by comparison, any modifying lens would have a serious impact on image quality.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,055 views & 4 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Is it possible to adapt Fujinon XF lenses to Canon?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1320 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.