Although I'm ready to be corrected.
Please confirm my ID and thank you for looking.
Becky
Daxiesmum Senior Member More info Post edited over 6 years ago by Daxiesmum. (3 edits in all) | Jan 21, 2017 04:49 | #1 Although I'm ready to be corrected. Please confirm my ID and thank you for looking. Becky www.flickr.com/photos/BeckyH1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SJCfromVT Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 21, 2017 05:56 | #2 I have no clue on the ID, but I do know it's a beautiful photo! *Sandy* "If we all had positive attitudes...we could change the world"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2017 07:23 | #3 I'm not going to guess this time, still a lovely photo though
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2017 10:05 | #4 SJC from VT wrote in post #18251108 I have no clue on the ID, but I do know it's a beautiful photo! Thank you both for your replies. At least you Commented. Which I really appreciate. www.flickr.com/photos/BeckyH1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dm1215al Goldmember More info | Jan 21, 2017 17:57 | #5 No idea what kind of bird, I do agree with the other post, great photo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 22, 2017 03:25 | #6 Sorry, the browns are still not rufous enough for a Nightingale. Also, Nightingale has a weaker bill and doesn't have the pale stripe over the eye. This is a Reed Warbler (assuming you took the shot in the UK). Incidentally Nightingales are devilishly difficult birds to see. They typically skulk in very dense cover and rarely show themselves, even when singing, although where there are a lot of them you can usually end up getting a view. I once came across a newly arrived migrant singing its heart out in, of all places, a coastal roadside lane. It had no more cover to hide in than a thin, scraggly hedge growing on a grassy bank, but even though it moved around a bit and I spent 15 minutes looking for it, I never did see it! Canon 7D2 · 16-35 f/4L IS · 17-55 f/2.8 IS · 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM · 50 f/1.8 · 100 f/2.8 Macro · 100-400L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thank you Jack. I am sure you are correct. I wasn't certain myself. The shot was taken in Hungary a few years ago, and one of our group said he thought it was a nightingale. It could have been a reed warbler, as there were ditches linnig the roadside that were reed-filled. Not ditches like we have in the UK, but really wide ones. So, thank you. I stand corrected. www.flickr.com/photos/BeckyH1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davem75 Member 61 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Oxfordshire. UK. More info | Jan 25, 2017 08:58 | #8 Although it's difficult to tell from one pic, the geographical location and general bulky appearance of the bird coupled with its chosen perch I think would point towards Great Reed Warbler.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nc_killie Senior Member 615 posts Likes: 387 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Scottish borders More info | Not a nightingale and sorry I cannot comment on whether its a GRW but a nice catch anyway! If you want an id it may help if you state where the photo was taken (and when).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1325 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||