
Stunning!
ShallowDoF Senior Member 416 posts Likes: 880 Joined Sep 2013 Location: Australia More info | Feb 17, 2017 01:28 | #1936 01Ryan10 wrote in post #18275161 ![]() Stunning!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
View_Finder Senior Member More info | Feb 17, 2017 10:24 | #1937 Brules wrote in post #18276175 Its an amazing lens.....I had the 17-40 too and as amazing as that lens still is, this one is just better in all the right spots. TACK sharp all the way across, which was always my biggest issue with the 17-40. That's good to know! Hoping to be wowed like I was with the 24-70II and the 70-200II. Can't wait! The IS will be nice to have for urban hiking without a tripod. R5, 5D4, 7D2, 50D: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400L IS II, 100 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/4L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, Σ14A, Σ35A, Σ85A
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2017 19:46 | #1938 |
Feb 21, 2017 08:08 | #1940 |
LoneRider Goldmember More info | Feb 24, 2017 13:34 | #1942 Image hosted by forum (841826) © LoneRider [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Wayne...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
View_Finder Senior Member More info | Feb 25, 2017 23:03 | #1943 Finally had some time today to take this one out for a test drive. Image hosted by forum (842055) © View_Finder [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (842056) © View_Finder [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. R5, 5D4, 7D2, 50D: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400L IS II, 100 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/4L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, Σ14A, Σ35A, Σ85A
LOG IN TO REPLY |
View_Finder Senior Member More info | Feb 25, 2017 23:06 | #1944 Another one. Different place. Image hosted by forum (842057) © View_Finder [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. R5, 5D4, 7D2, 50D: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400L IS II, 100 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/4L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, Σ14A, Σ35A, Σ85A
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phoenixkh a mere speck More info | Feb 25, 2017 23:24 | #1945 View_Finder wrote in post #18285194 Another one. Different place. Nice to have the IS. I usually never hike with a tripod. Hosted photo: posted by View_Finder in ./showthread.php?p=18285194&i=i250093366 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive So what do you think? Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corndogcabernet Senior Member More info Post edited over 6 years ago by corndog cabernet. (2 edits in all) | Feb 26, 2017 06:24 | #1946 View_Finder wrote in post #18285193 Finally had some time today to take this one out for a test drive. The temperature had dropped 50 degrees (Fahrenheit of course) in 24 hours. Wanted to capture that in the photos. Also wanted to shoot it wide open to see the much-touted sharpness for myself. The much touted sharpness, of what? Your exif(?) data doesn't indicate.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corndogcabernet Senior Member More info Post edited over 6 years ago by corndog cabernet. (2 edits in all) | Feb 26, 2017 06:27 | #1947 View_Finder wrote in post #18285194 Another one. Different place. Nice to have the IS. I usually never hike with a tripod. Yeah, IS is good.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
View_Finder Senior Member More info | Feb 26, 2017 08:08 | #1948 Phoenixkh wrote in post #18285202 So what do you think? In terms of sharpness, it definitely delivers - corner to corner, wide open. Much better than the 17-40 and 16-35 2.8II that I owned previously. Can't say too much in how it renders colors and contrast since it was such a gray day yesterday. I want to see how it handles flare. R5, 5D4, 7D2, 50D: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400L IS II, 100 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/4L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, Σ14A, Σ35A, Σ85A
LOG IN TO REPLY |
View_Finder Senior Member More info | Feb 26, 2017 08:10 | #1949 corndog cabernet wrote in post #18285358 Yeah, IS is good. What lens would you be talking about? Can we assume the 16-35 f4? Data doesn't say
R5, 5D4, 7D2, 50D: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400L IS II, 100 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/4L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, Σ14A, Σ35A, Σ85A
LOG IN TO REPLY |
View_Finder Senior Member More info | Feb 26, 2017 20:09 | #1950 "Encroachment" Image hosted by forum (842233) © View_Finder [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. R5, 5D4, 7D2, 50D: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400L IS II, 100 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/4L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, Σ14A, Σ35A, Σ85A
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1849 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||