Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
Thread started 08 Mar 2017 (Wednesday) 07:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Gimbal head to use with 055xprob - 5d3 / sigma 150-600 C / 70-200 2.8 ii / 2x ii extender

 
talz13
Member
93 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Avon, OH
Post edited over 1 year ago by talz13. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 08, 2017 07:39 |  #1

I was using my new Sigma 150-600 on my trusty old manfrotto 055xprob w/ 488RC2 last weekend to take some pics of the moon, and also popped the canon 2x extender on there for good measure. I think it captured some decent pics, but noticed that it was very difficult to position using the ball head.

I would loosen the ball, line up the moon, tighten the ball again, and then the weight of the lens would pull it down and I'd lose the moon out of the view. I'm thinking either the 488RC2 is either not big enough for this? Or maybe balanced on a gimbal head would be a better solution for the size of equipment I'm working with now.

Also noticed lots of vibration / bouncing whenever I would let go of the camera after setting up the shot. Is that something that would be fixed by changing the head, or is a carbon fiber tripod a better answer (or just a waste of money!)?

Edit: Here's a crop of the moon I took at 1200mm with the 150-600 and canon 2x extender. I think it's decent, though there is some blur to it. Not sure if it's due to the shutter speed, or vibration of the mount.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


7D, XSi, Canon 50 1.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,884 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Mar 08, 2017 11:53 |  #2

IMO that setup is too heavy for the RC2 system. I recommend beginning the upgrade to an Arca-Swiss style system, RRS being the top of the line that route but there are many other options.

At high magnifications you are always going to have some vibration, especially if there is wind. But yes a better quality ballhead, better quick release system and high quality CF tripod legs will all work to reduce that.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
talz13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Avon, OH
     
Mar 08, 2017 13:34 as a reply to  @ ben_r_'s post |  #3

I think I'm going to try out the Manfrotto 393 gimbal type mount on my 055xprob... It's worth a try for ~$175 vs nearly $600 for a (probably utterly astounding) Wimberley


7D, XSi, Canon 50 1.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,389 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4491
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 08, 2017 14:08 |  #4

Just FYI, the 393 is the biggest heaviest gimbal made. It is low cost because it is steel as opposed to aluminum, allow, etc..

With your set lens/body combo, a much lighter weight set up will suffice,. take a look at the Lensmaster or Wimberly sidekick solutions.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
3,866 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 566
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Mar 08, 2017 17:04 |  #5

I would agree with Cyberdyne's suggestions - either will do a good job. The 393 works well with heavy lenses (I used to have one) but they are big, heavy lighting supports that happen to be fairly good for lenses. They work but they are not ideal!

My personal suggestion would be that after you have sorted your tripod head I would look for a better tripod - a used Gitzo 3 series perhaps?


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
talz13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Avon, OH
Post edited over 1 year ago by talz13.
     
Mar 09, 2017 06:12 as a reply to  @ johnf3f's post |  #6

Yeah, I was looking at a review of my old 055xprob series lineup, and it had a video comparison of the vibration damping. Between the 055xprob taking ~4 seconds to come to rest after hitting the side of the camera, the 055cxpro3 only took like 1.5 seconds. Before I had the 150-600, I would have never noticed the difference!

Also, just compared weights on the Sidekick and 393... Quite a difference, the Sidekick is listed as 1.3 lbs and the 393 is 3.5 lbs. But I'd been comparing against the WH-200 (3.15 lbs., and way out of my price range), the Oben GH-50 (3.3 lbs.), and Benro GH2 (3 lb.). I'm not a big hiker, so I'm not planning on the extra 6-8 oz. being a big dealbreaker (or backbreaker!)


7D, XSi, Canon 50 1.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keltab
Senior Member
Avatar
888 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 247
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Colorado
     
Mar 29, 2017 14:26 |  #7

talz13 wrote in post #18296128 (external link)
Yeah, I was looking at a review of my old 055xprob series lineup, and it had a video comparison of the vibration damping. Between the 055xprob taking ~4 seconds to come to rest after hitting the side of the camera, the 055cxpro3 only took like 1.5 seconds. Before I had the 150-600, I would have never noticed the difference!

Also, just compared weights on the Sidekick and 393... Quite a difference, the Sidekick is listed as 1.3 lbs and the 393 is 3.5 lbs. But I'd been comparing against the WH-200 (3.15 lbs., and way out of my price range), the Oben GH-50 (3.3 lbs.), and Benro GH2 (3 lb.). I'm not a big hiker, so I'm not planning on the extra 6-8 oz. being a big dealbreaker (or backbreaker!)

Another vote for the Lensmaster RH-2. I use it regularly with my 055XPROB, 5DIV or 7DII, and the Tamron 150-600. It works very well and costs WAY less than the most expensive models. It is very reliable, and easy to set up and use. Also, the shipping was quick and easy.

If you have any specific questions please let me know



The Only Difference Between Ordinary and Extraordinary Is That Little Extra :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsuitor
Member
40 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Southern, NH
     
Mar 29, 2017 14:31 |  #8

Take a look at the Siri products. Good quality, reasonable price. The K-30 (or K-20) would be about right.

regards,
dms


1d4, 7d, 5d2, 50d, and a growing list of L lens and lighting

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
3,866 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 566
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Mar 29, 2017 16:53 as a reply to  @ dsuitor's post |  #9

Were you thinking of one of the Sirui heads with a Sidekick type attachment? I ask because I use the Sirui K40X, and whilst it is a very good ball head, I would not consider it suitable for long lenses on it's own.

My K40X will handle the biggest lenses that Canon/Nikon currently make - it is just that long (300mm +) lenses are a nightmare to handle on ball heads.


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bsmooth
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New England
     
Mar 30, 2017 13:56 |  #10

Another vote for Lensmaster RH-2. Its amazing how good it is and its not that heavy. I've had other people ask me what it is and then tell me how freely it moves compared to theres.
Problem with it is its just not that widely known, except for people who really look. Its definitely worth a look.


Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
graham121
Senior Member
Avatar
745 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 3072
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Pakenham, VIC, Aus
     
May 16, 2017 08:56 |  #11

Another vote for the lensmaster rh-2. Works great with a 300f2.8 + 2x on a 7d2 with grip. My limitation is my tripod which is totally inadequate for that combo, so that will be next on my list. The gimbal also works great with a monopod too.


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
3,866 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 566
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
May 16, 2017 16:29 |  #12

Quite happy with my Lensmaster RH1 for my 300 F2.8 - lighter than the RH2 and does a nice job! For the bigger stuff the Wimbeley 2 is just the ticket!


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,617 views & 2 likes for this thread
Gimbal head to use with 055xprob - 5d3 / sigma 150-600 C / 70-200 2.8 ii / 2x ii extender
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is norm281049
839 guests, 415 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.