Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 Mar 2017 (Wednesday) 12:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

best color correction method

 
Nick ­ Aufiero
Senior Member
462 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 87
Joined May 2013
Location: Tampa
Post edited over 6 years ago by Nick Aufiero. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 08, 2017 12:37 |  #1

I've been doing photography for a while and I'm realizing in post there are a lot of different ways

What is the most effective way you have seen?

Prefer links to videos or tutorials.
I don't mind paying if it is something well regarded by many.

I've used curves. I've messed with hue saturation levels per color. Everything seems to yield different results and the curves seems to leave my colors looking yellow/orange after selecting the "true" neutral grey according to the curves method. with the 50% gray on difference etc

sorry I shoot in camera RAW and use photoshop btw

/edit

secondly, anyone have any online sites they recommend like lynda etc




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tupe
Goldmember
Avatar
3,348 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 222
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN USA
Post edited over 6 years ago by tupe.
     
Mar 08, 2017 15:19 |  #2

It's tedious, but I like using the levels tool in PS to set the whitest and blackest pixels. No doubt there's an explanation of the process on POTN - that's probably where I learned how to do it.

I rarely use saturation. If the colors are true but muted, bumping up the shadows works much better.

[edit] I almost forgot, when a photo looks too yellow or blue to me, my first response is to use the PS selective color tool.


--Joe
Canon 20D, T2i, 100-400L IS, EF-S 18-55mm IS, EF-S 55-250mm IS, EF 50 f/1.8 II
Nikon D500, D7200, 18-55mm VR II, 55-200mm VR II, AF-P Nikkor 18-300 DX G ED VR, NIkkor AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR
-- https://www.flickr.com​/photos/155078134@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4606
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Mar 08, 2017 16:02 |  #3

What are you shooting? In the studio I will usually use a color checker to set up a color profile. For landscapes I usually set the camera to "Daylight" and leave it alone. I'll check the different camera profiles to see how they effect the colors and then adjust individual colors to taste. I'm wary of things that look like white or black as they often end up being a bit blue as well, which pushes the image too warm.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 08, 2017 16:20 |  #4

Could you post some of your photos for us to see? So we can see what you need to correct?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DagoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
1,997 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 1327
Joined Nov 2012
     
Mar 09, 2017 06:41 |  #5

I typically use Raya Pro and run the color setup and adjust each to taste.


Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ashleykaryl
Member
204 posts
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 09, 2017 09:44 |  #6

The best method is frankly shooting it right in camera and not needing to correct in post-production. Shoot well exposed, properly white balanced images and you are pretty much done. Throw in a custom camera profile for the best results. A few seconds in advance can save hours in post-production editing.


X-Rite Coloratti Pro, Phase One Ambassador
Author of Colour Management Pro
https://colourmanageme​ntpro.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DagoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
1,997 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 1327
Joined Nov 2012
     
Mar 09, 2017 11:18 |  #7

Shooting "right" in camera is ideal and I'd assume most do. The act of color correcting is two fold. One to get natural colors (can be done if shot properly exposed w/ correct WB) and two, correcting the image to enhance colors for your artistic intent which cannot be done in camera.


Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
medd63
Senior Member
574 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 543
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
     
Mar 09, 2017 13:17 |  #8

Getting right in the camera is only half the battle. Post processing is the other half


6D, 7D2, T4i, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 100mm Macro f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, 50mm f/1.4 IS, EF-S 55-250, 1.4 II TC, Kenko Extension Tubes, MeFoto Globetrotter & Roadtrip Tripods, Lightroom CC, Photoshop CC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ashleykaryl
Member
204 posts
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 09, 2017 14:06 as a reply to  @ medd63's post |  #9

If you get it right in camera there isn't a battle in post-production. That's the whole point.


X-Rite Coloratti Pro, Phase One Ambassador
Author of Colour Management Pro
https://colourmanageme​ntpro.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick ­ Aufiero
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
462 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 87
Joined May 2013
Location: Tampa
     
Mar 10, 2017 09:45 |  #10

I can try to link some images later.
Most of the stuff I shoot, which can be found at www.nickaufiero.com (external link) is fine for what I do but lately I've been moving into professional head shots and notice that the color correcting is kinda whack.
Lately I've been doing auto white balance since I've been in a hurry but I assume just get one of those grey cards to carry around and check the white balance off of that?

I am a little noob with this stuff since honestly I shoot B/W 90% of the time. Other times I get it fixed with camera RAW in photoshop so

thanks again for the inputs and links of some nature are perfectly fine with me




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
Post edited over 6 years ago by nathancarter. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 10, 2017 11:50 |  #11

Nick Aufiero wrote in post #18297206 (external link)
I can try to link some images later.
Most of the stuff I shoot, which can be found at www.nickaufiero.com (external link) is fine for what I do but lately I've been moving into professional head shots and notice that the color correcting is kinda whack.
Lately I've been doing auto white balance since I've been in a hurry but I assume just get one of those grey cards to carry around and check the white balance off of that?

I am a little noob with this stuff since honestly I shoot B/W 90% of the time. Other times I get it fixed with camera RAW in photoshop so

thanks again for the inputs and links of some nature are perfectly fine with me


Once your lighting is dialed in, have your first headshot subject of the day hold a ColorChecker or similar reference tool, and take a reference shot. After that, don't change the lighting; or, if you do, take another shot of the ColorChecker with the new lighting. At the computer, make sure your monitor is calibrated, then use the ColorChecker reference shot(s) to generate a profile for that lighting.

If you don't want to deal with a ColorChecker, then in most cases, a color-neutral gray card will get you 95% of the way there, either for setting custom white balance in the camera, or for setting it after the fact in post.

Using neither a gray card nor a ColorChecker, it'll be hard to get perfectly neutral color balance. If you value consistency, Auto White Balance will give you nothing but heartache.

Having said that: True neutral color balance isn't always what you want. For professional headshots it should get you very close. Sometimes people look better if you warm it up by 150K or so.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick ­ Aufiero
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
462 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 87
Joined May 2013
Location: Tampa
     
Mar 10, 2017 12:03 as a reply to  @ nathancarter's post |  #12

Thanks a lot. I will see you at my local camera store has and if all else fails I will get a neutral gray to you. For the most part I will be using natural lighting outside so I figured the gray card might be a little faster so I will check that out and see you to get me and I will be sure to remove auto white balance. I honestly just got a bad habit of using it because I've been till this point I've never needed to be 100% correct and a lot of my stuff is heavily post process anyways with some kind of color grading




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Mar 10, 2017 14:02 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

ashleykaryl wrote in post #18296556 (external link)
If you get it right in camera there isn't a battle in post-production. That's the whole point.

+1,000,000

If I am shooting in daylight, or using flash, I use AWB. If not, I use CWB. That takes care of 98.3% of my color issues. If I do correct any color issues in post, I do it to taste. I tried curves. Way too much of a learning curve for me. I can do everything I need in the BASIC Panel with Clarity, Vibrance, and Saturation. Very rarely, I'll use the HSL/COLOR panel. Maybe a handful of photos in a year. Oh, using LR5.7.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick ­ Aufiero
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
462 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 87
Joined May 2013
Location: Tampa
     
Mar 10, 2017 17:50 as a reply to  @ Bassat's post |  #14

yeah I mean I do the same. I mess with CWB sometimes but for everything I do its on the go and can be corrected easily later on with no issues.
I just noticed with professional headshots its a lot harder to do with the manual methods but I bought a spyder color chcker thing earlier so I'll be using that with head shots from now on




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
medd63
Senior Member
574 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 543
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
     
Mar 10, 2017 18:04 |  #15

If you get it right in camera there isn't a battle in post-production. That's the whole point.

Perhaps people are misunderstanding me. I was talking about photography in general, not just color correction. I would never dream of showing someone a photo I took SOOC, except to illustrate a before and after processing scenario.


6D, 7D2, T4i, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 100mm Macro f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, 50mm f/1.4 IS, EF-S 55-250, 1.4 II TC, Kenko Extension Tubes, MeFoto Globetrotter & Roadtrip Tripods, Lightroom CC, Photoshop CC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,812 views & 4 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
best color correction method
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1361 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.