Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 09 Apr 2017 (Sunday) 14:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5D Mark 3 VS Mark 4

 
moxphoto
Member
167 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2014
     
Apr 09, 2017 14:01 |  #1

Hi guys/gals..

So I've had my faithful 5D Mark 3 for 3 years. Love it.. such a great camera. I was excited for the Mark 4 to come out - but I felt that it got a lukewarm reaction at best and that tempered my excitement - so I haven't rushed out to buy one to replace my Mark 3. I have noticed some photographers upgrade to the Mark 4 from the Mark 3.. so I would like to hear form anyone here who's upgraded from a Mark 3 to a Mark 4. Do you like the Mark 4 more? Any advantages? Is it worth the investment to upgrade?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1970
Senior Member
Avatar
678 posts
Gallery: 159 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 586
Joined Dec 2010
     
Apr 09, 2017 18:47 |  #2

The only lukewarm receptions I have heard of is from people who just looked at the specs and never tried it. I upgraded from the mark III, and it is a huge difference. More MP to work with without being over the top (in my opinion) Much better focusing ability, especially in bad lighting. High ISO improvement, and a big dynamic range improvement. The DPAF is really good. When shooting static subjects, I can't tell a difference in focusing speed. Not to mention you don't have to worry about MFA adjustments when using DPAF. I have zero regrets from upgrading.



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
36,838 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5742
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 2 years ago by TeamSpeed. (4 edits in all)
     
Apr 09, 2017 19:59 |  #3

It is a great upgrade. It is better in every way over the 5D3, and the 5D3 was a great camera to begin with. Better high ISO, better shadow recovery, better AF, wifi, touchscreen that rocks, DPAF, great low light AF, a fast SD card slot over the slow 5D3 slot, and 30Mpx. I agree with the above, those that didn't think it was a good upgrade only looked at specs, they never shot with both. You get that alot with armchair quarterbacks... :)

It is a FF and an APS-H replacement to the 1D4 all wrapped in one body, other than lack of 10fps.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
For Sale: 2x Teleconverter
For Sale: Sigma USB Dock

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Drums
Member
46 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jun 2016
Location: Galway Ireland
     
Apr 12, 2017 06:55 |  #4

At first I did grumble about the early first prices of the iv & that the specs weren't as good as hoped for..... (Yes I know, You don't need to say it) however I have since gone and bought one. Main reasons I changed was actually to end the depreciation on the mark 3 that I'd had for 3.5 years, I traded it in, got what I thought it was worth and now have a new camera with a new warranty.

However, there is a great familiarity between the two cameras, muscle memory for things like AF shift, ISO buttons etc are where you would be with the 3. The low light focusing is just so much better, the Images at higher ISO's look (to me anyway) just that little cleaner SOOC.

Well worth the upgrade (if like I did, and you are trading in)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Savethemoment
Senior Member
Avatar
488 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 2 years ago by Savethemoment.
     
Apr 12, 2017 07:15 |  #5

I agree with the other posters, I have both cameras & the 5Div is a very worthwhile upgrade from the 5Diii.

I also have the 1Dxii but in some situations I prefer the 5Div: studio type settings where I'm not focusing on fast-moving subjects, & where the extra pixels & thus crop-ability are useful; and where the much smaller form factor is easier to deal with (eg when travelling).

Upgrade to the 5Div if you can, I think you'll be blown away. Truly.


Always learning
Always looking for the good light

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,531 views & 0 likes for this thread
5D Mark 3 VS Mark 4
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is DdsT
2174 guests, 343 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.