Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 20 Jun 2014 (Friday) 14:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

 
Larry20d
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Reisterstown, Md
     
Apr 12, 2017 21:44 |  #2056

Tomorrow I will be trading my 17-40L for the 16-35. The photos in this thread are amazing!!! Can't wait to get my hands on this lens. Can anyone recommend a lens that will provide similar results for my backup cropped sensor 80D?


5D Mark III, Canon 80D,16-35L, 24-105L, 70-300L IS, 100-400L IS, Nifty 50 1.4, Canon 135L, Canon 85 1.8, Canon EFS 18-135, Canon 55-250, Sigma 150 Macro, EFS-18-135, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Extension Tubes, Canon G10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
dochollidayda
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2075
Joined Aug 2012
     
Apr 13, 2017 01:09 as a reply to  @ Larry20d's post |  #2057

MalVeauX wrote in post #18325485 (external link)
Interesting.

The light is the weak point. But it will function at F2.8~F4 with high ISO. Most of us use big lights and bigger sources, because we stop down to F8~F11 and want spread for diffuse light.

Also, a macro with a built in light is not new, it's been done. It's just the first from Canon.

Kudos to Canon for doing something outside of their box.

I'll pass on one though, it's a master of none. Don't need that for macro.

Very best,

I do not have personal experience but I have heard great things about 10-22.
Having said that 16-35 F4 seems to be in a different league IMO.


flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dexs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,760 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 681
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Crete Greece.
     
Apr 13, 2017 05:21 |  #2058

The canon 10-22 is a fine lens, the only reason I sold it was for the 16-35 f4 which is a excellent lens.


I like what I like.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
h14nha
Goldmember
Avatar
2,024 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Nov 2008
Location: South Wales, UK
     
Apr 13, 2017 05:23 |  #2059

Larry20d wrote in post #18326548 (external link)
Tomorrow I will be trading my 17-40L for the 16-35. The photos in this thread are amazing!!! Can't wait to get my hands on this lens. Can anyone recommend a lens that will provide similar results for my backup cropped sensor 80D?

Why not use it on both ? For many years the 17-55/2.8 was the go-to on my 7D.............. If you want an ultra wide then Samyang have MF prime options. For AF then Canon 10-22/Sigma 10-20/Tokina 11-18. For the above a prime could have been tricky as the river prevents foot zooming.

This is Sturminster Newton Mill on the river Stour. I actually took this lens out of its pouch yesterday for the first time in 6 months.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Ian
There's no fool like an old skool fool :D
myflickr (external link)
My Gear - 7d, / 16-35mm F4 / 70-200 2.8 II / 100-400 / 300mm 2.8 / :D Fuji X Pro1 / XT-1 Graphite 18/35/56

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fplstudio
Senior Member
Avatar
410 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1914
Joined Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 13, 2017 07:25 |  #2060

Another two of the set, this time converted in B&W to add more drama

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2840/33951786976_e50df7dc4c_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …6976/in/datetak​en-public/  (external link)

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2836/33951789296_4661023ba2_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …9296/in/datetak​en-public/  (external link)

10+ years with Canon, now new fresh air with Sony Full Frame
A7R3 | A6300 | MC-11 | FE 16-35 GM | EF 35 1.4 Art | FE 55 1.8 | FE 85 1.8 | EF 70-200 4L IS | FE 100-400 4.5-5.6 GM OSS | E 10-18 4 OSS | E 35 1.8 OSS
Godox AD200 | V860ii | 2x TT600

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnPh
I smell like a Shoulder Shrugging Seal
Avatar
2,464 posts
Gallery: 181 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1742
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Deepst darkest Cornwall
     
Apr 13, 2017 10:34 |  #2061

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2826/33884875871_fa594a69bc_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TChR​4M  (external link) 260 seconds at the Crowns (external link) by John Phelan (external link), on Flickr

ՕFlickr (external link)500px (external link)
Facebook (external link)
serial underexposer
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BallerStatus
Goldmember
1,100 posts
Gallery: 326 photos
Likes: 1156
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Apr 13, 2017 10:51 |  #2062

Larry20d wrote in post #18326548 (external link)
Tomorrow I will be trading my 17-40L for the 16-35. The photos in this thread are amazing!!! Can't wait to get my hands on this lens. Can anyone recommend a lens that will provide similar results for my backup cropped sensor 80D?

I would recommend the Canon 10-18 over the 10-22. From what I have read, the 10-18 is just as good, but is a lot cheaper. Yes it has STM instead of USM autofocus, but this thing focuses very quickly and quietly. I've been using it for real estate for the past few months, but want to have a wide angle to work with my full frame bodies, so I just placed an order for the 16-35 today :-).


2 6D - 35 f1.4L, 135 f2L, 50 f1.8 STM, 85 f1.8
EOS M and M5 - 11-22 f4-5.6 IS, 22 f2
AE-1 Program - FD 50 f1.8
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ursyn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1519
Joined Oct 2009
     
Apr 13, 2017 13:12 |  #2063

fplstudio wrote in post #18326801 (external link)
Another two of the set, this time converted in B&W to add more drama

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …6976/in/datetak​en-public/  (external link)

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …9296/in/datetak​en-public/  (external link)

I like result of your post processing. It works really well.


Adrian | flickr (external link) & Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry20d
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Reisterstown, Md
     
Apr 13, 2017 14:08 as a reply to  @ BallerStatus's post |  #2064

How is the sharpness? I tend to print 13x19 and larger.


5D Mark III, Canon 80D,16-35L, 24-105L, 70-300L IS, 100-400L IS, Nifty 50 1.4, Canon 135L, Canon 85 1.8, Canon EFS 18-135, Canon 55-250, Sigma 150 Macro, EFS-18-135, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Extension Tubes, Canon G10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brules
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 79
Joined Jun 2010
Location: OKC
     
Apr 13, 2017 23:10 |  #2065

Sharpness of the 16-35 F4L IS? TACK sharp........like a razor blade........


S100 | 5D III | 16-35 F4 IS L | 35 F1.4L | 40 2.8 | 85 F1.2 II L | 135 F2 L | 70-200 F2.8 IS II L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dochollidayda
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2075
Joined Aug 2012
     
Apr 14, 2017 02:10 as a reply to  @ Brules's post |  #2066

I think he was asking about 10-18, no one questions the sharpness of 16-35 F4L anymore.


flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry20d
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Reisterstown, Md
     
Apr 14, 2017 08:14 as a reply to  @ dochollidayda's post |  #2067

Yes. I was asking about the 10-18. Sorry for the confusion.


5D Mark III, Canon 80D,16-35L, 24-105L, 70-300L IS, 100-400L IS, Nifty 50 1.4, Canon 135L, Canon 85 1.8, Canon EFS 18-135, Canon 55-250, Sigma 150 Macro, EFS-18-135, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Extension Tubes, Canon G10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry20d
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Reisterstown, Md
     
Apr 14, 2017 08:18 as a reply to  @ h14nha's post |  #2068

I think I will try my 16-35 (got it yesterday) on the 80D before I decide on the 10-18. Hopefully, the 16-35 will suffice for wide angle.


5D Mark III, Canon 80D,16-35L, 24-105L, 70-300L IS, 100-400L IS, Nifty 50 1.4, Canon 135L, Canon 85 1.8, Canon EFS 18-135, Canon 55-250, Sigma 150 Macro, EFS-18-135, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Extension Tubes, Canon G10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brules
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 79
Joined Jun 2010
Location: OKC
     
Apr 14, 2017 10:26 |  #2069

10-18 would be going backwards. Next step you need is go to full frame. :)


S100 | 5D III | 16-35 F4 IS L | 35 F1.4L | 40 2.8 | 85 F1.2 II L | 135 F2 L | 70-200 F2.8 IS II L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry20d
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Reisterstown, Md
     
Apr 14, 2017 10:38 |  #2070

Brules wrote in post #18327754 (external link)
10-18 would be going backwards. Next step you need is go to full frame. :)

See my sig. The 80D is my backup to my 5D Mark III.


5D Mark III, Canon 80D,16-35L, 24-105L, 70-300L IS, 100-400L IS, Nifty 50 1.4, Canon 135L, Canon 85 1.8, Canon EFS 18-135, Canon 55-250, Sigma 150 Macro, EFS-18-135, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Extension Tubes, Canon G10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,027,332 views & 8,580 likes for this thread
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Elleder
344 guests, 223 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.