Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk DIY & Customizing 
Thread started 29 Mar 2017 (Wednesday) 19:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Ifrared Conversion

 
JackRFlint
Member
53 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Rhinelander, WI
     
Mar 29, 2017 19:15 |  #1

Has anyone here had an infrared conversion done? If so who did you use and were you happy with the work?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
KeithS
Member
242 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 78
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Arizona
Post edited over 1 year ago by KeithS.
     
Mar 29, 2017 20:14 |  #2

I had a Canon 7D converted to 590nm (super color filter) by LifePixel and bought a 720nm converted Panasonic Lumix from Kolari Vision. I'm happy with both. I recently set the Canon to record in RAW and jpg, as rendering the RAW files is a little more complicated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yendikeno
Senior Member
Avatar
359 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 81
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Mar 29, 2017 23:49 |  #3

I haven't, but friend has, and used LifePixel as well. He was very satisfied with their work.


_____________
Regards,
AZFred

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rwmson
Senior Member
342 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 622
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ USA
     
Mar 30, 2017 06:28 |  #4

I used Kolarivision and had problems but they made it right in the end by giving me a new camera body.


yeah, I gots some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
Avatar
2,844 posts
Gallery: 314 photos
Likes: 5323
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Gainesville, GA
     
Mar 30, 2017 07:25 |  #5

KeithS wrote in post #18314467 (external link)
I had a Canon 7D converted to 590nm (super color filter) by LifePixel and bought a 720nm converted Panasonic Lumix from Kolari Vision. I'm happy with both. I recently set the Canon to record in RAW and jpg, as rendering the RAW files is a little more complicated.

Would you mind explain what you mean by rendering raw files being more complicated?


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pigpen101
Member
236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2017
Post edited over 1 year ago by Pigpen101.
     
Mar 30, 2017 16:48 |  #6

KeithS wrote in post #18314467 (external link)
I had a Canon 7D converted to 590nm (super color filter) by LifePixel and bought a 720nm converted Panasonic Lumix from Kolari Vision. I'm happy with both. I recently set the Canon to record in RAW and jpg, as rendering the RAW files is a little more complicated.


I also bought a converted Lumix from Kolari Vision and had a lot of fun. My conversion, however, was the highest nm available only allowing for B&W photos. Just keep in mind you still have some post production work to do. These were 2 from Gettysburg a couple years ago.
I'm not entirely sure, but when I first looked into having a DSLR converted I was told it best to send the lens that you would use w/ it so the focus could be adjusted as the focus for IR is slightly off.  ????


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KeithS
Member
242 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 78
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Arizona
Post edited over 1 year ago by KeithS. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 01, 2017 14:56 |  #7

jcothron wrote in post #18314717 (external link)
Would you mind explain what you mean by rendering raw files being more complicated?

A "little" more complicated.....Sure. Using Lightroom, I needed to download the DNG Profile Editor from Adobe Labs and use it to set up a white balance that would allow the Lightroom to be used for future raw processing. Without that step in starting with a raw file, the temp slider has no room to move far enough to remove a sufficient amount of the red to enable a satisfactory channel swap. With a jpg taken with a proper white balance, this step is unnecessary and can go directly to Photoshop. Now, if images are to be rendered in black and white, it doesn't matter.

ETA Then the raw files need to be imported, in Lightroom, as dng, or converted to dng before beginning processing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KeithS
Member
242 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 78
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Arizona
     
Apr 01, 2017 15:18 |  #8

Pigpen101 wrote in post #18315151 (external link)
I also bought a converted Lumix from Kolari Vision and had a lot of fun. My conversion, however, was the highest nm available only allowing for B&W photos. Just keep in mind you still have some post production work to do. These were 2 from Gettysburg a couple years ago.
I'm not entirely sure, but when I first looked into having a DSLR converted I was told it best to send the lens that you would use w/ it so the focus could be adjusted as the focus for IR is slightly off.  ????

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by Pigpen101 in
./showthread.php?p=183​15151&i=i141627740
forum: DIY & Customizing


thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by Pigpen101 in
./showthread.php?p=183​15151&i=i187644539
forum: DIY & Customizing

For Canon DSLRs, Life Pixel recommends the 50mm f/1.8, which I bought for my 7D. Without sending in another lens, they will calibrate for the 50mm. It works well, but I wish it was wider. I've tried a few other lenses but all exhibited hotspots to a certain extent. There is in depth info on their website. What is needed (but too few users to warrant it) is a feature in LR or PS to repair hotspots in one click.

They say focusing is best done with live view. I've used both methods and haven't noticed any issues with focus-when it is achieved. Live view tends to hunt a lot and may go so far OOF that it will not achieve focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZoneV
Goldmember
1,642 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
Post edited over 1 year ago by ZoneV.
     
Apr 18, 2017 03:04 |  #9

I have converted years ago my Canon EOS Rebel XT / 350D to infrared (external link) (and more). But I have to admit that I have not worked with it the last years.
I did the conversion on my own, used a differten way thant all others to have the possibilitiy to change the filters (I could not decide, and back then still need this camera as visible backup camera).
I was very happy with the conversion, it is not perfect - but works well enough for my needs.

IMAGE: http://4photos.de/galerie/Infrarot/slides/Infrarotfoto.jpg


IMAGE: http://4photos.de/galerie/Infrarot/slides/_MG_4515.jpg

DIY-Homepage (external link) - Image Gallery (external link) - Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,646 views & 2 likes for this thread
Ifrared Conversion
FORUMS General Gear Talk DIY & Customizing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is m3ltingp0int
910 guests, 441 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.