Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News 
Thread started 19 Feb 2017 (Sunday) 10:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

New Sigma lenses

 
DarthVader
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,490 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Death Star
     
Feb 21, 2017 22:40 as a reply to  @ post 18281141 |  #31

You are richer than most people in the poor country :)


Nikon/Fuji.
Gear is important but skills are very important :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ah-keong
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 321
Joined Apr 2016
     
Feb 22, 2017 20:38 |  #32

I must say it is an expensive hobby for me.
If Sigma release the 105mm Makro lens.... wow.

I got to rob the bank to pay for all these poison.... :-D


Canon 7D Mark II | BG-E16 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm | Sigma DC 18-35mm ART | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | Zeiss 100mm Makro-Planar ZE
Canon Speedlite 430EX III-RT | 600EX-RT
Olympus E-PL3 | M.Zuiko ED 7-14mm PRO
Manfrotto BeFree Travel Tripod |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,028 posts
Gallery: 366 photos
Likes: 1540
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Feb 26, 2017 01:56 |  #33

I'd love Sigma to do a crazy new macro lens of some type...

Maybe bump the aperture on a 105 to f/2 or something, make it 2:1... built in macro LED light? :D


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ma11rats
Senior Member
Avatar
838 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 431
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Az
     
Feb 26, 2017 11:17 as a reply to  @ KenjiS's post |  #34

Why would you want a faster macro lens? DOF is already tiny with an f2.8 lens. Stopping down to f11 rarely gets enough in focus. The best resulting macro images are usually a stacked set of images. A 105 f2 macro doesn't make sense, it'd be huge and you'd never/rarely use it at f2. You might, might, get one of the setting prongs on a ring completely sharp, but you'd never get the whole diamond in focus. You might get part of an eye on an insect in focus but you'd never get the whole insect in focus.

I like the idea of a light built in but the issue with adding a light at the end of the barrel is loss of contrast and inducement of flare if the light is near the first element. They would have to raise it up a bit like the eos m 28mm macro or make it like how a ring-light attaches to the front of the lens. An LED light to cover the size of a FF lens would have be WAY bigger than the lens to be powerful enough to actually illuminate your subject, especially at f11 or so. Think of the power that ring-lights emit. It's basically a speedlite, way more than a tiny strip LED.

I think a 180mm lens would make more sense for a 2:1 lens. You'd have a lot more working distance with a 180 over a 100 and you'd need WAY more light at the same settings if you're doubling the magnification. I think it'd be very cool, but not a lot of customers would know how to use it properly. Take the Canon macro 1-5 http://www.the-digital-picture.com …5x-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx (external link)


I like your thinking out of the box though!


www.matthewbeutelphoto​graphy.com (external link)
1D4, 6D, 80D, 35f2IS, T 85f1.8VC, T 24-70f2.8VC, T 17-50f2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,028 posts
Gallery: 366 photos
Likes: 1540
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Apr 27, 2017 00:28 |  #35

ma11rats wrote in post #18285615 (external link)
Why would you want a faster macro lens? DOF is already tiny with an f2.8 lens. Stopping down to f11 rarely gets enough in focus. The best resulting macro images are usually a stacked set of images. A 105 f2 macro doesn't make sense, it'd be huge and you'd never/rarely use it at f2. You might, might, get one of the setting prongs on a ring completely sharp, but you'd never get the whole diamond in focus. You might get part of an eye on an insect in focus but you'd never get the whole insect in focus.

I like the idea of a light built in but the issue with adding a light at the end of the barrel is loss of contrast and inducement of flare if the light is near the first element. They would have to raise it up a bit like the eos m 28mm macro or make it like how a ring-light attaches to the front of the lens. An LED light to cover the size of a FF lens would have be WAY bigger than the lens to be powerful enough to actually illuminate your subject, especially at f11 or so. Think of the power that ring-lights emit. It's basically a speedlite, way more than a tiny strip LED.

I think a 180mm lens would make more sense for a 2:1 lens. You'd have a lot more working distance with a 180 over a 100 and you'd need WAY more light at the same settings if you're doubling the magnification. I think it'd be very cool, but not a lot of customers would know how to use it properly. Take the Canon macro 1-5 http://www.the-digital-picture.com …5x-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx (external link)


I like your thinking out of the box though!

Sorry for the late reply

More because sometimes I use a macro lens for non-macro things, it would make it more of a dual purpose lens basically

My only experience with a ringlight wasnt terribly positive, I preferred using my 580EX off camera on a cord, but it met the concrete and is dead now.. Have yet to decide what im replacing it with...


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

9,114 views & 23 likes for this thread
New Sigma lenses
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is army1414
893 guests, 411 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.