Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands 
Thread started 20 Apr 2017 (Thursday) 11:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Sony A9: Is Canon doomed ?

 
CheshireCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
Post edited over 1 year ago by CheshireCat.
     
Apr 26, 2017 23:36 |  #541

johnf3f wrote in post #18339402 (external link)
Now we have a Sony body that looks very promising (well at least from the specs) - but at a grand more than my (new) 1DX was????

?? A grand more ??


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,636 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4921
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 27, 2017 10:58 |  #542

embargo is off, you can see the full review of the A9 now



Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
12,065 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2841
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
     
Apr 27, 2017 11:31 |  #543

Charlie wrote in post #18340064 (external link)
embargo is off, you can see the full review of the A9 now


Thanks for posting that, Charlie. I found the Northrup's review to be very balanced and objective, and extremely informative.

I can't help but to relate to one thing that Tony said, "Ergonomically, I still like the big, fat DSLR."

I hope that at some point in the near future, Sony realizes that there are actually a fair number of photographers who prefer a large camera, and that making everything "small and light" is actually not always an advantage.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,636 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4921
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 27, 2017 11:40 |  #544

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18340095 (external link)
Thanks for posting that, Charlie. I found the Northrup's review to be very balanced and objective, and extremely informative.

I can't help but to relate to one thing that Tony said, "Ergonomically, I still like the big, fat DSLR."

I hope that at some point in the near future, Sony realizes that there are actually a fair number of photographers who prefer a large camera, and that making everything "small and light" is actually not always an advantage.

.

I just want the no blackout, which looks amazing.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corndog ­ cabernet
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 731
Joined May 2010
Location: State of chaos
     
Apr 27, 2017 12:54 |  #545

“The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.” - Mark Twain

If this is old news or has been posted here before, my apologies:
https://petapixel.com …mirrorless-fatal-mistake/ (external link)
In the above article the author makes some good points and a few might be exagerated to fortify his POV, IMO. Overall, he makes a fairly compelling case however.

Though I have been very interested to read about FF Mirrorless, I have long been skeptical about Sony. With the exception of a Walkman (back in the stone ages) and a Trinitron XBR TV (middle ages) every Sony product I've bought was pretty much a piece of junk. I'm also aware of their history of trying to reinvent the wheel and lock up a market. http://www.obsoletemed​ia.org/lists/sony/ (external link) and I don't glom on so easy. Sony seems to like to gamble, in the hopes of hitting it big. I'm not much of a gambler myself.

Funny thing, the more I read about Sony and Nikon and Canon, the more I'm attracted to Fuji.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Likes: 250
Joined Oct 2014
Post edited over 1 year ago by idkdc. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 27, 2017 13:31 |  #546




banding still present.

af looks decent in video, odd omission of 4k 60p, prob has to do with lack of xqd. grip is too small with gmaster lenses for medium sized hands.


1DXII(2) | 5D4 | D850 | 8-800mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,636 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4921
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 27, 2017 14:10 |  #547

idkdc wrote in post #18340191 (external link)



banding still present.

af looks decent in video, odd omission of 4k 60p, prob has to do with lack of xqd. grip is too small with gmaster lenses for medium sized hands.

it's too bad, he didnt list the shutter speed, since the banding is dependent on shutter speed. One of the workarounds with banding has been to shoot at different shutter speeds, and you just have to test this before you commit to shooting for the night. From what I remember, 1/80, 1/125 and 1/160 were ok? it's been a few months since I had to figure out, but there was a work around for the a7rii


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Likes: 250
Joined Oct 2014
     
Apr 27, 2017 14:53 |  #548

Charlie wrote in post #18340233 (external link)
it's too bad, he didnt list the shutter speed, since the banding is dependent on shutter speed. One of the workarounds with banding has been to shoot at different shutter speeds, and you just have to test this before you commit to shooting for the night. From what I remember, 1/80, 1/125 and 1/160 were ok? it's been a few months since I had to figure out, but there was a work around for the a7rii

Those workaround shutter speeds are not really good options for stage performances. Interesting to know. Thank you for taking the time to share with me that information.


1DXII(2) | 5D4 | D850 | 8-800mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
     
Apr 27, 2017 15:00 as a reply to  @ Charlie's post |  #549

The buffer download speed to SD is a bummer.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
Post edited over 1 year ago by CheshireCat.
     
Apr 27, 2017 15:09 |  #550

idkdc wrote in post #18340191 (external link)


af looks decent in video, odd omission of 4k 60p, prob has to do with lack of xqd.

Very high quality H.264 4k@60 requires about 200 Mbps (25 MB/sec). Therefore the issue must be either encoder ASIC performance or thermal.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
Avatar
2,058 posts
Gallery: 97 photos
Likes: 306
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago & Terminal 1, 3 or 5 with Samsonite & Pelican
     
Apr 27, 2017 15:11 |  #551

corndog cabernet wrote in post #18340165 (external link)
“The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.” - Mark Twain

If this is old news or has been posted here before, my apologies:
https://petapixel.com …mirrorless-fatal-mistake/ (external link)
In the above article the author makes some good points and a few might be exagerated to fortify his POV, IMO. Overall, he makes a fairly compelling case however.

Though I have been very interested to read about FF Mirrorless, I have long been skeptical about Sony. With the exception of a Walkman (back in the stone ages) and a Trinitron XBR TV (middle ages) every Sony product I've bought was pretty much a piece of junk. I'm also aware of their history of trying to reinvent the wheel and lock up a market. http://www.obsoletemed​ia.org/lists/sony/ (external link) and I don't glom on so easy. Sony seems to like to gamble, in the hopes of hitting it big. I'm not much of a gambler myself.

Funny thing, the more I read about Sony and Nikon and Canon, the more I'm attracted to Fuji.

I feel the same about Sony. I'm really considering Leica again; Fuji is a crop.

I thought I could salvage my Zeiss glass investment with Sony, but the size of the kit is still the size of the glass.


multidisciplinary visual guy | traveler on the 8-fold path | seeker of the spark | walker of the dog
all dingus | dslr canon 5D4, 16-35III, 70-200LII zeiss distagon 15, 21, 25, 28, 50ƒ1.4 milvus; vario-sonnar 24-85; makro planar 50, 100 mirrorless fujifilm XT-2, XT-20, 16, 18, 56, 16-55, 50-140; zeiss distagon 12, planar 32

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Likes: 250
Joined Oct 2014
     
Apr 27, 2017 15:12 |  #552

CheshireCat wrote in post #18340273 (external link)
Very high quality H.264 4k@60 requires about 200 Mbps (25 MB/sec). Therefore the issue must be either encoder ASIC performance or thermal.

That's true, yeah. Even low compression 800 Mbit is just 125 MBps, which should be fine for UHS II cards. Probably thermal since the ASIC can handle 20 FPS compressed RAW? Maybe ASIC though since it only handles 12 fps uncompressed raw.


1DXII(2) | 5D4 | D850 | 8-800mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corndog ­ cabernet
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 731
Joined May 2010
Location: State of chaos
Post edited over 1 year ago by corndog cabernet.
     
Apr 27, 2017 15:30 |  #553

mcluckie wrote in post #18340274 (external link)
I feel the same about Sony. I'm really considering Leica again; Fuji is a crop.

I thought I could salvage my Zeiss glass investment with Sony, but the size of the kit is still the size of the glass.

I'm not advocating for aps sized format specifically, but with my recent entree into Fuji's world with an X100S, I have been favorably impressed. While certainly no substitute for a Canon or Nikon with long lenses, with shorter lenses they deliver. Travel and general use where exquisite speed isn't necessary but high image quality is required is where Fuji shines.

Any working guy doing events or fashion or sports will still want their DSLRs, or maybe, a hot rod mirrorless like Sony.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,472 posts
Likes: 369
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Apr 27, 2017 15:56 |  #554

corndog cabernet wrote in post #18340290 (external link)
I'm not advocating for aps sized format specifically, but with my recent entree into Fuji's world with an X100S, I have been favorably impressed. While certainly no substitute for a Canon or Nikon with long lenses, with shorter lenses they deliver. Travel and general use where exquisite speed isn't necessary but high image quality is required is where Fuji shines.

Any working guy doing events or fashion or sports will still want their DSLRs, or maybe, a hot rod mirrorless like Sony.

For my travel I use a Sony kit which consists of two cameras ( A7R and A6000 ) and a collection of lenses from 18mm up to 100mm. My travel photography consists of both street / environmental portraits and landscape photography and ultimate image quality is important for my landscapes. I tried the Fuji system for a bit but found the image quality was lacking, especially when printing large.

With the two Sony cameras, they share everything from lenses, batteries, cards and chargers. I use the A7R mostly for landscapes and environmental images along with Zeiss glass and use the 6300 with either the Sony 28mm or 35mm which make for a great very compact outfit.

Going the Sony route for my travel allows me to use one system for both my landscape images and street images, very flexible that way.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
Avatar
2,058 posts
Gallery: 97 photos
Likes: 306
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago & Terminal 1, 3 or 5 with Samsonite & Pelican
     
Apr 27, 2017 16:54 |  #555

corndog cabernet wrote in post #18340290 (external link)
I'm not advocating for aps sized format specifically, but with my recent entree into Fuji's world with an X100S, I have been favorably impressed. While certainly no substitute for a Canon or Nikon with long lenses, with shorter lenses they deliver. Travel and general use where exquisite speed isn't necessary but high image quality is required is where Fuji shines.

Any working guy doing events or fashion or sports will still want their DSLRs, or maybe, a hot rod mirrorless like Sony.

Hot rod, maybe. I'm hoping the 6D2 will take EgS screens and CF. But, yeah, a real silent mode.

You're right; there seems to be a lot of medium-wide to normal lenses in APS-C systems.

I had a 100S and I think my lack of love was the 35mm lens. I have a love/hate with a 35mm—I'd need a 28 or a 50 to make the voices stop.

The Xt-2 looks very interesting, so I can get my preferred focal length. I'd have to get new optics, but I have no idea what I'd sell to make room. Its too much trouble... maybe just go Leica and be done.

Humorous aside:
I was just in Manhattan and went to B and H, looking to see these options. Salesguy blew off Fuji and Canon M5 because they're APS-C, done deal. Wouldn't even get off his chair. I said I read that Fuji has better lenses than Sony, and he kept pushing an A7r2 to me. The viewfinder was kind-of optical experience. Never got shown a Fuji or M5, despite my asking again.


multidisciplinary visual guy | traveler on the 8-fold path | seeker of the spark | walker of the dog
all dingus | dslr canon 5D4, 16-35III, 70-200LII zeiss distagon 15, 21, 25, 28, 50ƒ1.4 milvus; vario-sonnar 24-85; makro planar 50, 100 mirrorless fujifilm XT-2, XT-20, 16, 18, 56, 16-55, 50-140; zeiss distagon 12, planar 32

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

94,227 views & 720 likes for this thread
Sony A9: Is Canon doomed ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is BokehBender
451 guests, 298 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.