Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
Thread started 23 Feb 2017 (Thursday) 14:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Favorite Lens - Real Estate

 
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,256 posts
Gallery: 133 photos
Likes: 742
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
May 10, 2017 22:48 |  #16

dmward wrote in post #18351596 (external link)
Around me, the realtors want wide to make a room look spacious. That creates a challenge for finding points of view that won't make things look too strange. If it looks too distorted I show the realtor the back of the camera and let them decide. They invariably take the wider shot.

That's interesting. My clients don't want to have a buyer disappointed when a room is not as big as they thought from the photos so I am careful not to deliberately misrepresent the size of a room.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
dmward
Cream of the Crop
8,993 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1037
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
May 16, 2017 18:57 |  #17

rgs wrote in post #18351603 (external link)
That's interesting. My clients don't want to have a buyer disappointed when a room is not as big as they thought from the photos so I am careful not to deliberately misrepresent the size of a room.

The difference in field of view between different lenses has an impact on the appearance of a space. Most humans have peripheral vision that is at least as wide as a 20 to 16mm lens on 36mm sensor.

The difference is that a human mind does a much better job correcting corner distortion than a lens. Then when cropped to a given size the edge distortion is more prominent.

Foreshortening is another visual characteristic of lenses that the human optical system does a great job correcting.

That's why, for years, the default "normal" lens for a 36mm sensor was 50mm. However, I doubt that any realtor would want to have a property photographed with a 50mm lens.

I don't think a wider angle lens misrepresents the space relative to human vision, the foreshortening does present depth which it seems realtors like in the pictures.

What I've found shooting for realtors is that they want whatever the rest of the office is doing. :-(


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,256 posts
Gallery: 133 photos
Likes: 742
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
May 16, 2017 21:20 |  #18

dmward wrote in post #18356394 (external link)
The difference in field of view between different lenses has an impact on the appearance of a space. Most humans have peripheral vision that is at least as wide as a 20 to 16mm lens on 36mm sensor.

The difference is that a human mind does a much better job correcting corner distortion than a lens. Then when cropped to a given size the edge distortion is more prominent.

Foreshortening is another visual characteristic of lenses that the human optical system does a great job correcting.

That's why, for years, the default "normal" lens for a 36mm sensor was 50mm. However, I doubt that any realtor would want to have a property photographed with a 50mm lens.

I don't think a wider angle lens misrepresents the space relative to human vision, the foreshortening does present depth which it seems realtors like in the pictures.

What I've found shooting for realtors is that they want whatever the rest of the office is doing. :-(

Not so sure a cold discussion of our processing capabilities as opposed to a camera's is the point. You also have to be a bit careful of window pulls because of the lack of 3D information in a photograph. It's not a direct line from our brains to the camera sensor. If the lens is so wide as to make the photograph of the room appear much larger than it appears when one is in the room, the distortion - whatever it's cause - misrepresents the room. When a buyer feels like he or she has been deceived -intentionally or not - by the photographs, the realtor is blamed. Most of my clients do not want that to happen. 16mm (or 10mm on a crop) can easily make a room appear MUCH larger than it is. Usually best to back off a touch but each photographer and each realtor must decide that in their market and for each room. Just something to be aware of.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
8,993 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1037
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
May 16, 2017 23:46 |  #19

rgs wrote in post #18356481 (external link)
Not so sure a cold discussion of our processing capabilities as opposed to a camera's is the point. You also have to be a bit careful of window pulls because of the lack of 3D information in a photograph. It's not a direct line from our brains to the camera sensor. If the lens is so wide as to make the photograph of the room appear much larger than it appears when one is in the room, the distortion - whatever it's cause - misrepresents the room. When a buyer feels like he or she has been deceived -intentionally or not - by the photographs, the realtor is blamed. Most of my clients do not want that to happen. 16mm (or 10mm on a crop) can easily make a room appear MUCH larger than it is. Usually best to back off a touch but each photographer and each realtor must decide that in their market and for each room. Just something to be aware of.

You're right that it does depend on the realtor.
In the last month more than 50 realtors, with one exception, while approving close to a 1000 room images has asked why the room looks bigger than it is in reality. Several have asked if there is a way to make it look bigger.

The one expectation was a realtor concerned about the edge distortion making the chair look too big. Not that the room was too big, just the chair.

This is a for properties ranging from $250K condos to $3 million houses.

As a commercial photographer, job is to create and present pictures that satisfy the client's expectations.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvdang7
Member
111 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
May 17, 2017 12:07 |  #20

Hi guys, I am close to getting my real estate license and I have an older t1i that i would like to revive. What would be a budget lens for interior work?


*new*
Canon T1i 18-55mm IS and 50-250mm IS Yn-465 flash.:)
*old*
Canon rebel XS/1000D 18-55 IS and 75-300mm, 50mm f1.8 nifty fifty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BallerStatus
Goldmember
1,066 posts
Gallery: 319 photos
Likes: 1080
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
May 18, 2017 11:02 as a reply to  @ tvdang7's post |  #21

Canon 10-18 would be a good choice for a budget wide angle on a crop body. I have one for sale as I went with the 17-40L to use on my 6D. Send me a PM if interested. Thanks!

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4179/33878532890_6557814a74_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TBJk​w3  (external link) IMG_7467 (external link) by Bridgesphoto (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/605/33071119465_e4aec6217f_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Soo8​CV  (external link) 1304 Wilshire Rd (6) (external link) by Bridgesphoto (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2140/32689082570_3b18dbed0b_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RNC6​nU  (external link) 1304 Wilshire Rd (16) (external link) by Bridgesphoto (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2259/32689065110_15b938c6e3_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RNC1​bS  (external link) 1304 Wilshire Rd (40) (external link) by Bridgesphoto (external link), on Flickr

2 6D - 17-40 f4L, 35 f1.4L, 135 f2L
EOS M - 22 f2
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FTb
Senior Member
528 posts
Gallery: 94 photos
Likes: 2948
Joined Jun 2014
     
Jul 17, 2017 23:30 |  #22

Without question, 17mm TS-E on full size sensor.



My flickr (external link)
Favorite lenses: Canon 16-35 f/4 L IS, 50/1.2L, 85/1.2L II, 135/2L, 70-200L IS II, TS-E 17mm f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheShutterMonkey
Member
173 posts
Gallery: 147 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1058
Joined Jul 2016
     
Jul 18, 2017 12:03 |  #23

+1 for the Canon 17mm F4 L TS-E. What's cool about the 17mm is... if it's too wide, I can use a 1.4x TC and it's closer to a 24mm OR, sometimes I just mount it on an APS-C body and it's about 25.5mm

I took this last month while visiting Southern California when we went to look at some model homes.

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4236/35188990462_1345d56222_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/VBwL​U7  (external link) Enclave at Yorba Linda, California (external link) by Ken (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgoetz4
Senior Member
Avatar
292 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Hanover, Pa-Baltimore, Md
     
Aug 14, 2017 06:05 |  #24

A few yrs back, I used my 40D and 10-22mm lens, between 10 & 14mm. Clients were happy, and that's what it's all about :-)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


6D, 10-22 (modified for the 6D) 7Artisans 25 1.8, Meike 35 1.7, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC
Fuji X-E1 x2 and a bunch of FD glass
Fuji X100
Sky-Watcher 8'' Dobsonian

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,643 views & 13 likes for this thread
Favorite Lens - Real Estate
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is edwardo
471 guests, 380 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.