rantercsr wrote in post #18391432
-'my rules ?..no just a general statement. .i apologize for using the word "rules" so loosely
...a vlogging camera is usually small, light and has an articulating screen ,,, i didnt make that up.. i swear !
No problem with your second sentence.
Mckinon used what ever he wants i made no negative comment against that ..
Seriously... why are you still attacking that ?
Is it just a matter of " winning ?"
I said don't read too much into it, and here you are reading too much into it.
I dont speak for anyone.. just making
Observations...i think im allowed?
Then you should make clear the claim that "I" would like X in this camera without following it up with "<insert generalization about a demographic>." That's what I'm addressing.
Ok you win canon is perfect .. makes no errors , every one should shoot canon... no one in this thread should criticise canon... we shouldnt discuss where canon could improve , because theyve done it so perfectly that we should only praise canon... ok ?.. is that good with you.?
Not that I care that much for it, but that's called a straw man. I think we're almost at the end of our discussion. I'm not taking issue with what you're saying, just how you're saying it. I agree that true 1080P resolution at 4:2:0 or 4:2:2 8 or 10 bit would have been nice in a more efficient codec (H265). But I think if you're disappointed with it not having 120P, you're still looking for features in the wrong camera. If HFR is a priority for you, get the FS5 or FS7. The FS700 is incredibly affordable now for that purpose. Hopefully Canon will release the C100 Mark III next year to address your wishes, but until then, those are your options.