Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Glamour & Nude Talk 
Thread started 25 May 2016 (Wednesday) 12:47
Search threadPrev/next

Fine art nude vs Pornography

185 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles, CA
May 31, 2016 09:56 |  #16
bannedPermanent ban

I love this forum :lol:

“Photography for me is not looking, it’s feeling. If you can’t feel what you’re looking at, then you’re never going to get others to feel anything when they look at your pictures.”
— Don McCullin

1,236 posts
Gallery: 426 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 2050
Joined Jun 2011
Location: SW Germany
May 31, 2016 10:40 |  #17

nathancarter wrote in post #18024834 (external link)
I kinda like "illicit" in this context. :)

Yeah, I quite understood - that's why the writers got their vocabulary mixed up  :p

Frank, also known as jazzman
C&C welcome
Image Editing OK (for reposting in the same thread)

I Jazz

Senior Member
364 posts
Gallery: 124 photos
Likes: 1798
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Lincoln, CA, USA
Post edited over 1 year ago by Lunatique.
Dec 07, 2016 14:12 |  #18

It's important to reiterate that art and porn are not mutually exclusive. It's possible for creative works to qualify as both. As for deconstructing and comparing them, try this: http://www.academia.ed​u …ne_Art_versus_P​ornography (external link)

My website (art, music, photography, writing): http://www.ethereality​.info/ (external link)

I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
2,058 posts
Gallery: 97 photos
Likes: 306
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago & Terminal 1, 3 or 5 with Samsonite & Pelican
Dec 07, 2016 15:52 |  #19

fourfa wrote in post #18018809 (external link)
Pornography is in the eye of the beholder; but so is art. In my view nudity in itself is not pornographic per se.

It is all about quality, taste and in some extent intent.

Is Michelagelo's David porn? Are Boticelli's paintings porn? If not why not?

Pornography and art are not mutually exclusive. You may argue that Henry Miller's books are pornographic, but they are also considered works of literature.

What you find on porn sites is almost all not art, but then most of the stuff some photographers label as fine art isn't either.


multidisciplinary visual guy | traveler on the 8-fold path | seeker of the spark | walker of the dog
all dingus | dslr canon 5D4, 16-35III, 70-200LII zeiss distagon 15, 21, 25, 28, 50ƒ1.4 milvus; vario-sonnar 24-85; makro planar 50, 100 mirrorless fujifilm XT-2, XT-20, X-F10, 16, 56, 16-55, 50-140; zeiss distagon 12, planar 32

Senior Member
766 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 205
Joined Jan 2015
Post edited over 1 year ago by icor1031. (2 edits in all)
Jul 02, 2017 08:58 |  #20

OhLook wrote in post #18023102 (external link)
Pardon me, but researchers have found that there is a difference. I don't make these things up.

What did they research? (I'm a psych student)

Was it this? https://www.ncbi.nlm.n​​C2739403/ (external link)
Found this too: …al/v7/n4/full/n​n1208.html (external link)

(2) Canon 6D || Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/2 || Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 || Sigma 85mm f/1.4 || Helios 44-2 58mm f/2 || Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art || Canon 24mm f/2.8 || Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 || (2) Eg-S Focusing Screen
Ideal Portraits (external link)

16,958 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 4029
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
Jul 02, 2017 11:11 |  #21

icor1031 wrote in post #18392429 (external link)
What did they research? (I'm a psych student)

Was it this? https://www.ncbi.nlm.n​​C2739403/ (external link)
Found this too: …al/v7/n4/full/n​n1208.html (external link)

From memory only: The article at your first link basically covers the territory. (Straight) men are more aroused by the mere sight of women's bodies than (straight) women are by the sight of men's. Women respond more to emotional cues. Steven Pinker wrote that Playgirl magazine, an analogue of Playboy ostensibly intended for a female audience, in reality appealed mostly to gay males. Pinker stated an evolutionary rationale for the sexes' different responses to nudity in How the Mind Works.

PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | IMAGE EDITING OK


10,989 views & 8 likes for this thread
Fine art nude vs Pornography
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Glamour & Nude Talk 
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©

Latest registered member is My Travel Tripod
665 guests, 284 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017 Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.