MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18396235
Don't you guys think the 16-35GM should beat the 12-24, it should be $500 better.
Charlie I'm sure you've seen this-https://nisifilters.com.au …y-fe-12-24mm-f4-g-lenses/
I just ordered a Sharpstar to fit a B18 which I don't have but placed an offer on one at FM, wish me luck on that.
I really like the paper looks of the Sigma 14mm until I look at the weight of it. That weigh means I won't carry it and
that's just being true to myself.
I already have a lot of bombo filter stuff, which works with both 100mm and 150mm filters, and I'm trying to stay away from 150mm, not travel friendly.
for anything astro, by far my favorite lens, the rokinon 24 f1.4. Also have the 14, but the 16-35gm would be intended to replace it, and make a place in my event shooting bag.
I only need 1 wide lens for event photos, a 16-35 or 24-70, I dont need anything wider.
if I go the 24-70 route, then 24 would be my widest filter configuration, 16-35, then that would be my filtered lens.
24-70 much more preferable with events, in a pinch, I can use that lens alone and get good results. That lens pairs better with the 12-24 when it comes to most landscapes, however my favorite variety involve ocean and water, which means filters. I have a set of rear gels I can play for now, if feasible, then I'de prefer the 12-24, 24-70 combo in all honesty.
Sony A7riii/A9 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - CV 21/3.5 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC