Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 16 Jul 2017 (Sunday) 10:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Money or usefulness not the issue.

 
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,647 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 594
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
Post edited over 1 year ago by smythie.
     
Jul 17, 2017 04:42 |  #31

BigAl007 wrote in post #18403607 (external link)
1200 f/5.6, Sigma 200-500 f/2.8, 400 f/2.8 probably in that order, before either of the other two options. I've physically touched the Sigma at the NEC Photography Show, it's a real beast. Unfortunately I didn't get to view either of the Canon options. The big whites were all mounted on a viewing gallery which allowed a view across the show hall. Couldn't get my wheelchair up the steps:cry:.

Alan

Over a decade ago I got to play with a (tripod mounted) 1200/5.6 at a camera show in Sydney. What a monster of a lens.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,715 posts
Likes: 120
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Jul 17, 2017 13:46 |  #32

I purchase based on my expected use.
I guess there are lenses out there that would be nice to own for various reasons, but as it is I often carry more gear than I am comfortable with.
Today's bodies often allow for slower lenses to be effective, resulting in lower weight.

Having said that, I miss my 300f/2.8L IS. A terrific all around lens.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
     
Jul 17, 2017 18:22 |  #33

Tapeman wrote in post #18404194 (external link)
Having said that, I miss my 300f/2.8L IS. A terrific all around lens.

... all around...ish... :)


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyndön
Goldmember
2,030 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 139
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Jul 18, 2017 07:49 as a reply to  @ post 18403840 |  #34

That was my point. Extremely rare and nearly impossible to obtain, so something you could brag about and couldn't be one-upped very easily. Since it seems the OP just wants something to show off and not use.

I'm sure many lenses these days would compare favorably in terms of IQ and tech, but it's more about the history of that lens than anything else that makes it special. Sort of like a classic sports car with a racing heritage. Sure there are newer/better/cheaper cars available, but there something special about owning a piece of history. At least in my opinion.


GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,024 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 215
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Portsmouth England
Post edited over 1 year ago by fordmondeo.
     
Jul 18, 2017 11:09 |  #35

Lyndön wrote in post #18404743 (external link)
That was my point. Extremely rare and nearly impossible to obtain, so something you could brag about and couldn't be one-upped very easily. Since it seems the OP just wants something to show off and not use.

I'm sure many lenses these days would compare favorably in terms of IQ and tech, but it's more about the history of that lens than anything else that makes it special. Sort of like a classic sports car with a racing heritage. Sure there are newer/better/cheaper cars available, but there something special about owning a piece of history. At least in my opinion.

What's up with showing off?
I love my camera gear. The engineering is amazing. The functionality second to none.
People buy Ferraris and Porches and the likes. They don't need them, but they still buy them.


Vaginator9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john ­ crossley
Goldmember
Avatar
2,210 posts
Likes: 660
Joined Nov 2009
Location: The Rhubarb Triangle
     
Jul 18, 2017 15:44 |  #36

fordmondeo wrote in post #18404918 (external link)
What's up with showing off?.

Well, you know what they say: Those that can, do. Those that can't, brag about the size of their lens.


Some days I'm the dog, some days I'm the lamppost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 405
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
Post edited over 1 year ago by CheshireCat.
     
Jul 18, 2017 16:31 |  #37

john crossley wrote in post #18405167 (external link)
Those that can't, brag about the size of their lens.

Yep... but I do not recommend "doing the helicopter" with your supertele.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
12,154 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2923
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
     
Jul 25, 2017 18:42 |  #38

Lyndön wrote in post #18404743 (external link)
Since it seems the OP just wants something to show off and not use.


fordmondeo wrote in post #18404918 (external link)
What's up with showing off?
I love my camera gear. The engineering is amazing. The functionality second to none.

It would seem that you are only interested in showing off, based on the following comment that you made earlier:

fordmondeo wrote in post #18403243 (external link)
I don't care about usefulness, weight, focal range, sharpness, price, what my primary uses are or bokeh.
Try and think bragging rights.

"Bragging rights" and showing off are really the same thing. . Exactly the same thing. . So, based on your initial statement, where you hold "bragging rights" in esteem, and claim not to care about "usefulness", it doesn't seem at all unreasonable for Lyndon to suggest that you just want to show off, and not use the lens.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
Senior Member
764 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 205
Joined Jan 2015
     
Jul 26, 2017 08:14 |  #39

DreDaze wrote in post #18403403 (external link)
for bragging rights, i'd say the 200f1.8 instead...or the sigma 200-500f2.8:-)

This guy /\

A 200/1.8 with working AF!


(2) Canon 6D || Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/2 || Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 || Sigma 85mm f/1.4 || Helios 44-2 58mm f/2 || Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art || Canon 24mm f/2.8 || Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 || (2) Eg-S Focusing Screen
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ascenta
Senior Member
Avatar
483 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 188
Joined Sep 2005
     
Jul 26, 2017 08:55 |  #40

Get the biggest lens you can. Hit it with a can of gold Rust-Oleum metallic paint and add some fake diamonds/jewels. Bling bling...pinky diamond ring!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeterAlex7
Member
158 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Dec 2015
     
Jul 27, 2017 03:02 |  #41

fordmondeo wrote in post #18403243 (external link)
Which of these two lenses is the outright sexy-est?

200mm f2L or 300mm f2.8L mk2

I don't care about usefulness, weight, focal range, sharpness, price, what my primary uses are or bokeh.
Try and think bragging rights.

Given the choice, what would you choose?

I assume that you are just want to have one of them. It's easy, you can go with the 300 f2.8L II first. If you don't like it, the cash you will get from selling it still enough to fund an almost new or brand new (refurb) 200 f2L.

Many said that the 300 f2.8 II works very well with the version III TC's, but the 200 f2 didn't.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,024 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 215
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Portsmouth England
     
Nov 28, 2017 06:47 |  #42

Usefulness has just become an issue.

Just threw down £4.7k on a 200 f2.0 which is due to arrive in 10 days.

I thought I was a decisive man but now I'm wondering/having second thoughts/suffering from pre-emptive buyers remorse.

Looking back over my snaps it appears I do a lot of motorsports, planes in flight and wildlife.

As has already been said, the 200 will work with 1.4 and2.0 TCs but as a pixel peeper will I be disappointed?
Is the IQ hit really that apparent?


Vaginator9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wyntastr
Senior Member
Avatar
550 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
     
Nov 30, 2017 17:39 |  #43

DreDaze wrote in post #18403811 (external link)
in that case, just go for the 200-500f2.8...just make sure you handhold it only...and you can save money by skimping on a memory card since the pictures don't matter anyways...just look how bad-ass you'd look:

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://www.juzaphoto.​com/article.php?l=en&a​rticle=62'  (external link)

Ha, can you imagine taking shots of airplanes at a fairly large airport with that thing?
Homeland security would be paying you a visit pretty quickly!


6D - 1D Mk III - 60D - Rokinon 8 fisheye - EF 17-40 f/4L - EF 40 f/2.8 STM - EF 50 f/1.8 Mk I - EF 85 f/1.8 - EF 70-200 f/4L - EF 80-200 f/2.8L Magic Drainpipe - EF 300mm f/4L - EF 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,758 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1171
Joined Oct 2010
     
Dec 02, 2017 08:14 |  #44

The 300mm f2.8L mk2 because I own it.

However...I'm too sexy for my lens, too sexy for my lens, so sexy it hurts! :-)


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
10,048 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1822
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gig Harbor, Washington
Post edited 8 months ago by umphotography.
     
Dec 03, 2017 21:04 |  #45

When I was trying to decide , I choose the 300F/2.8 over the 200 F2/0 because the girl that brought out the 300 had a great rack. :p:twisted: :p

Just Sayin


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

10,666 views & 28 likes for this thread
Money or usefulness not the issue.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Bill_NY
850 guests, 401 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.