Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Fuji Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Jan 2013 (Sunday) 14:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

STICKY: Fuji Users Unite - Post your comments, questions and images here

 
Osa713
Goldmember
Avatar
1,177 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 693
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Post edited over 1 year ago by Osa713.
     
Aug 03, 2017 22:37 as a reply to  @ post 18418758 |  #5071

I thought you were about to sell all of your gear ;-)a


LIGHT>LENS>BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
F2Bthere
Senior Member
Avatar
921 posts
Likes: 399
Joined Oct 2015
     
Aug 03, 2017 23:47 as a reply to  @ post 18418758 |  #5072

The 56/1.2 focuses faster and more accurately than the 85/1.2L.

If you want a lens with better Bokeh quality than the 85/1.2L, get the APD version of the 56/1.2.


C&C always welcomed...
On my images, of course, and on my words as well--as long as it's constructive :).
https://www.instagram.​com/storyinpictures_co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
6,546 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Likes: 634
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Aug 04, 2017 00:01 |  #5073

Osa713 wrote in post #18418800 (external link)
I thought you were about to sell all of your gear ;-)a

LOL!!

Here's the deal with personal preference........

I've done a lot of thinking and the 16-55 will not jive with my application yet I will consider buying the 18-55 kit lens for general use when my daughters use my X-T2.

The 18 f/2, 23 f/2, 35 f/2 will not work for me since I really want primes for f/1.4. Due to compression the 50mm f/2 would have worked for me just fine "I think".

23mm f/1.4 not really a consideration as I totally adore the 24mm FOV from my 16mm f/1.4. I sold my Canon 35L and replaced it with a cheaper awesome 35mm f/2IS just so that I have a 35mm (56mm fov) for my Canon 80D and my infrequent use of 35mm for my Canon full frame. I find the new designed Canon 35f/2IS produces really nice micro contrast that you usually find in the Canon L glass (mk2) newer designed lenses.

Waiting for an updated fuji 35mm f/1.4 mk2 and newer UWA that is f/2.8 instead of slow 10-24mm f/4.....I can dream :)

Sold the 27mm as it did not jive with my style in photography.

90 f/2 is tempting but after using a Canon 135L I've discovered it's very long and a faster 85mm (FOV) just seems more personal when shooting portraits.

The 50-140 is something in my short list as it's going to be versatile for run/gun situations while having infinite opportunities of perspective. I still do feel the Canon 70-200 f/2.8mk2 provides prime lens IQ from 70-200mm zoom and still is better IQ than the Fuji long telephoto offering :)

Nothing in my scope of photography needing a variable aperture lens like the 18-135mm or 100-400.

I definitely need a batter booster for my X-t2. This however becomes a negative as it will make a small form factor into a chunky body.

If I do purchase any more fuji lenses it's strictly due to a "steal" price. I'd buy another fuji body before lens I think........

Evil secondary system that gives me fuji happiness.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 35mm f/2 IS | 85 mkII L | 100L | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji X-T2 w/battery booster | 16mm f/1.4 | 56 f/1.2 | 10-24 f/4.0 | 50-140 | TT685
Sony A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,230 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3001
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Bowie, MD
Post edited over 1 year ago by EverydayGetaway. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 04, 2017 00:17 |  #5074

I basically used this image as a test shot for editing with my new Microsoft Surface Pro... so far loving the thing :)

X-T1 + Rokinon 85mm via Lens Turbo ii

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4329/35365569603_108aaccca1_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/VT8M​J4  (external link) DSCF2155.jpg (external link) by Lucas (external link), on Flickr

EDIT: Actually, that might be the lens turbo there in the background on the right attached to my Zeiss 50/1.7... so this might be just a straight through adapter :oops: I can never remember... when using the X-Pro2 I always remember to switch the adapted lenses FL since it changes the frame lines for the OVF, but with the X-T1 I pretty much always forget (which is why it says this was a 12mm lens).

Fuji X-Pro2 // Fuji X-T1 // Fuji X-100T // XF 18mm f2 // XF 35mm f1.4 // XF 60mm f2.4 // Rokinon 12mm f2 // Rokinon 21mm f1.4 // XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 // XF 55-200mm f3.5-4.8 // Rokinon 85mm f1.4 // Zhonghi Lensturbo ii // Various adapted MF lenses
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
6,546 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Likes: 634
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Aug 04, 2017 00:19 |  #5075

F2Bthere wrote in post #18418828 (external link)
The 56/1.2 focuses faster and more accurately than the 85/1.2L.

If you want a lens with better Bokeh quality than the 85/1.2L, get the APD version of the 56/1.2.

Looking at comparisons.... the APD does have a nicer fall off but it also apparently changes the real specs to f/1.7 IIRC. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I've read this often when doing my research.

85Lmk2 is truly indeed a pig for AF but for portraits it's sublime. Not something I'd use for ceremony work even for brisk walking subjects. I'm not a Sigma ART lens fan but I did appreciate the blazing Canon EF85 f/1.8 for excellent IQ with accurate focus.

I'll be playing around more with the 56 f/1.2 very soon :) almost pulled the trigger on a 90 f/2 but 85mm FOV matches my style much better.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 35mm f/2 IS | 85 mkII L | 100L | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji X-T2 w/battery booster | 16mm f/1.4 | 56 f/1.2 | 10-24 f/4.0 | 50-140 | TT685
Sony A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,230 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3001
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Bowie, MD
     
Aug 04, 2017 00:25 |  #5076

AlanU wrote in post #18418841 (external link)
Looking at comparisons.... the APD does have a nicer fall off but it also apparently changes the real specs to f/1.7 IIRC. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I've read this often when doing my research.

85Lmk2 is truly indeed a pig for AF but for portraits it's sublime. Not something I'd use for ceremony work even for brisk walking subjects. I'm not a Sigma ART lens fan but I did appreciate the blazing Canon EF85 f/1.8 for excellent IQ with accurate focus.

I'll be playing around more with the 56 f/1.2 very soon :) almost pulled the trigger on a 90 f/2 but 85mm FOV matches my style much better.

I honestly prefer the look of slower portrait primes a majority of the time. I think people get too caught up in "bokeh" and obliterating backgrounds with shallow DOF. I can't stand portraits where you have 1 eye ball just barely in focus and then everything else blurred by DOF.

I do love the rendering of the 85L though.


Fuji X-Pro2 // Fuji X-T1 // Fuji X-100T // XF 18mm f2 // XF 35mm f1.4 // XF 60mm f2.4 // Rokinon 12mm f2 // Rokinon 21mm f1.4 // XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 // XF 55-200mm f3.5-4.8 // Rokinon 85mm f1.4 // Zhonghi Lensturbo ii // Various adapted MF lenses
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F2Bthere
Senior Member
Avatar
921 posts
Likes: 399
Joined Oct 2015
     
Aug 04, 2017 08:09 |  #5077

AlanU wrote in post #18418841 (external link)
Looking at comparisons.... the APD does have a nicer fall off but it also apparently changes the real specs to f/1.7 IIRC. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I've read this often when doing my research.

85Lmk2 is truly indeed a pig for AF but for portraits it's sublime. Not something I'd use for ceremony work even for brisk walking subjects. I'm not a Sigma ART lens fan but I did appreciate the blazing Canon EF85 f/1.8 for excellent IQ with accurate focus.

I'll be playing around more with the 56 f/1.2 very soon :) almost pulled the trigger on a 90 f/2 but 85mm FOV matches my style much better.

Yes and no :). The T-stop (how much light gets through) becomes 1.7. But the f-stop (how the picture looks, how shallow the depth of field is, how good it is at blurring backgrounds) is still f1.2.

The APD version still focuses better than the Canon, both speed and accuracy, and the pictures look better than the Canon pictures.

The regular (non-APD) version of the 56 focuses much better but the Canon 85/1.2L has a slight edge in picture quality. The APD version is way ahead.

On another note, you mentioned that you love the 24mm FF field of view and f1.4 primes. I am quite surprised the Fuji 16/1.4 hasn't made your short list. It is a field of view you like and it is, arguably Fuji's best lens. It smokes just about anything I have seen in the field ov view and costs a fraction of what the Leica equivelent costs (and the Leica doesn't perform as well other than in having FF coverage).

The 16/1.4 can also make unique images due to the combination of f1.4 and close focus capability, this lens can be used for a type of storytelling you can't do with something else.


C&C always welcomed...
On my images, of course, and on my words as well--as long as it's constructive :).
https://www.instagram.​com/storyinpictures_co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F2Bthere
Senior Member
Avatar
921 posts
Likes: 399
Joined Oct 2015
     
Aug 04, 2017 08:15 |  #5078

EverydayGetaway wrote in post #18418847 (external link)
I honestly prefer the look of slower portrait primes a majority of the time. I think people get too caught up in "bokeh" and obliterating backgrounds with shallow DOF. I can't stand portraits where you have 1 eye ball just barely in focus and then everything else blurred by DOF.

I do love the rendering of the 85L though.

I, too, rarely use a portrait length lens at f1.2. I'm much more likely to use it at f2.8. It is how the lens renders that matters, which still shows up at f2.8, that I care about.

An exception to this is the Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 (NOT Otus or Milvus, the older design version), which has a unique quality at f1.4 which is gone by f2. This is worth exploiting :).


C&C always welcomed...
On my images, of course, and on my words as well--as long as it's constructive :).
https://www.instagram.​com/storyinpictures_co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
6,546 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Likes: 634
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Post edited over 1 year ago by AlanU.
     
Aug 04, 2017 10:54 |  #5079

F2Bthere wrote in post #18419015 (external link)
Yes and no :). The T-stop (how much light gets through) becomes 1.7. But the f-stop (how the picture looks, how shallow the depth of field is, how good it is at blurring backgrounds) is still f1.2.

The APD version still focuses better than the Canon, both speed and accuracy, and the pictures look better than the Canon pictures.

The regular (non-APD) version of the 56 focuses much better but the Canon 85/1.2L has a slight edge in picture quality. The APD version is way ahead.

On another note, you mentioned that you love the 24mm FF field of view and f1.4 primes. I am quite surprised the Fuji 16/1.4 hasn't made your short list. It is a field of view you like and it is, arguably Fuji's best lens. It smokes just about anything I have seen in the field ov view and costs a fraction of what the Leica equivelent costs (and the Leica doesn't perform as well other than in having FF coverage).

The 16/1.4 can also make unique images due to the combination of f1.4 and close focus capability, this lens can be used for a type of storytelling you can't do with something else.

I do own the Fuji 16mm :) That is really what made me incredibly happy with the Fuji system. I wish my Canon system had a APS-C 24mm FOV equivalent. I feel my 24Lmk2 with 5dmk3 still is without a doubt sharper with beautiful micro contrast. 24Lmk2 has this similar sharp look just like my newer mk2 generation 24-70Lmk2 and 70-200 mk2. I feel the Fuji 16mm performs similar to an older Canon 24L mk1. The performance of the fuji 16mm is absolutely fantastic.

I've always considered my 85L as a complete pig slow AF lens. It's definitely a magical lens when used appropriately. F/1.2 aperture is really nice when you need it but I often stop down as well.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 35mm f/2 IS | 85 mkII L | 100L | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji X-T2 w/battery booster | 16mm f/1.4 | 56 f/1.2 | 10-24 f/4.0 | 50-140 | TT685
Sony A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Two ­ Hot ­ Shoes
Goldmember
Avatar
2,451 posts
Gallery: 275 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 2354
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Ireland
     
Aug 04, 2017 10:56 as a reply to  @ EverydayGetaway's post |  #5080

That is one 'happy' looking cat


Fuji: X-PRO2, X-T2, X-T1, X-E2 | 16/1.4, 18/2, 23/1.4, 35/1.4, 56/1.2, 90/2, 16-55/2.8, 10-24/4. Pelican, Ona, ThinkTank, Matthews Grip, Elinchrom
Gear & Discounts (external link)Instagram (external link)Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Two ­ Hot ­ Shoes
Goldmember
Avatar
2,451 posts
Gallery: 275 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 2354
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Ireland
     
Aug 04, 2017 11:37 |  #5081

Aaaah would ya just look at the colour and contrast that the Fuji RAF's give SOOC. Just imported into lightroom no settings applied, no sharping, no colour, nothing. both of these takin with the X-PRO2 and the XF 16mm


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Fuji: X-PRO2, X-T2, X-T1, X-E2 | 16/1.4, 18/2, 23/1.4, 35/1.4, 56/1.2, 90/2, 16-55/2.8, 10-24/4. Pelican, Ona, ThinkTank, Matthews Grip, Elinchrom
Gear & Discounts (external link)Instagram (external link)Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PineBomb
I have many notable flaws
Avatar
2,470 posts
Gallery: 92 photos
Likes: 1171
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Austin, Texas
Post edited over 1 year ago by PineBomb.
     
Aug 04, 2017 16:42 |  #5082

I just saw that our very own EverydayGetaway got a plug from Fuji Rumors for his blog defending the honor of the XF 18mm. Nice.

http://www.fujirumors.​com …ove-waiting-xf18mm-mk-ii/ (external link)


-Matt
Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | instagram (external link) | street portrait project on instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rantercsr
Goldmember
Avatar
2,447 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 4049
Joined Mar 2014
     
Aug 04, 2017 17:51 |  #5083

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4373/36239081171_bf1252a808_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/XdjL​hk  (external link) DSCF1446-2 (external link) by Randall Herrera (external link), on Flickr

Fuji XT2 / Panasonic GH5 / Sony A7R3 / Canon t4i / Pentax K1000
My portraits IG (external link)My everything else IG (external link)
MY flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
6,546 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Likes: 634
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Aug 04, 2017 18:09 |  #5084

Taking a minimal approach in my Fuji gear line up I wanted to adapt my "vision" with my latest lens. The 56 prime just felt like a perfect fitting glove for the application I intend to use it for. Just enough breathing room between the lens and subjects yet it provides beautiful compression to the image.

I'll have to say I was anticipating and expecting this type of performance from this portrait lens. Pleased with the image quality and somewhat responsive auto focus speed. I wanted this lens not for my previous bad habit of gear whore/lust but now I'm focusing on specific application with selected FOV.

I also just did some personal family portraits sessions with this lens and the f/1.2 still had enough dof with the crop sensor to provide sharp eyes in the small group photo. Using this lens almost felt like the AF performs somewhere in between my Canon 85Lmk2 and EF 85 f/1.8.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 35mm f/2 IS | 85 mkII L | 100L | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji X-T2 w/battery booster | 16mm f/1.4 | 56 f/1.2 | 10-24 f/4.0 | 50-140 | TT685
Sony A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Two ­ Hot ­ Shoes
Goldmember
Avatar
2,451 posts
Gallery: 275 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 2354
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Ireland
     
Aug 05, 2017 17:33 |  #5085

Just in from being out all afternoon, the kitten super excited that we are back home but still, he sits quietly for my Daughter as she feeds him some fresh chicken.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Fuji: X-PRO2, X-T2, X-T1, X-E2 | 16/1.4, 18/2, 23/1.4, 35/1.4, 56/1.2, 90/2, 16-55/2.8, 10-24/4. Pelican, Ona, ThinkTank, Matthews Grip, Elinchrom
Gear & Discounts (external link)Instagram (external link)Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

931,061 views & 5,464 likes for this thread
Fuji Users Unite - Post your comments, questions and images here
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Fuji Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Emce
858 guests, 353 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.