Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 21 Aug 2017 (Monday) 20:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Solar Eclipse Party (Outreach) from Florida | Aug 21 2017

 
Inspeqtor
I brought this thread back to LIFE
Avatar
6,513 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 1083
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
     
Aug 22, 2017 12:25 |  #16

WOW!! The details you are able to get on the Sun is Amazing!!

Thank you for sharing!!!!


Charles
Canon EOS 60D Gripped * Canon EOS XSi * Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
10,622 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2335
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Aug 22, 2017 13:48 |  #17

He cheated...

Nobody can compete with his concrete mount.


My entire hobby of gear lust has temporarily been shifted into overload. Please be patient while my mind tries to get back onto the road to recovery. We do apologize for any inconvenience this may cause....
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brylek
Senior Member
Avatar
373 posts
Gallery: 218 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1304
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Aug 22, 2017 13:58 |  #18

Talley wrote in post #18434236 (external link)
He cheated...

Nobody can compete with his concrete mount.

What he said :)

congrats on the results!


Canon 5D MkII - 11-24mm F4L / 24-70mm F2.8L II / 85mm F1.2L II / 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS / 500mm F4L IS
flickr (external link)
Instagram: @starman864

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blindshooter
Member
227 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Tampa
     
Aug 22, 2017 14:26 |  #19

This is awesome!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
10,622 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2335
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Aug 22, 2017 16:03 |  #20

What I noticed and amazed with that nobody has mentioned is the fact these photos were taken with a camera that can be bought for $100-150ish. The original EOS M.

That camera is way more capable than what people make it out to be. I thought about having one just to have one as a backup. Can video and everything.


My entire hobby of gear lust has temporarily been shifted into overload. Please be patient while my mind tries to get back onto the road to recovery. We do apologize for any inconvenience this may cause....
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
subsailorfl
Member
Avatar
135 posts
Gallery: 97 photos
Likes: 426
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Nature Coast Florida USA
     
Aug 22, 2017 17:16 |  #21

Nothing but awesome work from you.


Constructive criticism is always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,710 posts
Gallery: 1104 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8056
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited 10 months ago by MalVeauX.
     
Aug 22, 2017 17:53 |  #22

Talley wrote in post #18434319 (external link)
What I noticed and amazed with that nobody has mentioned is the fact these photos were taken with a camera that can be bought for $100-150ish. The original EOS M.

That camera is way more capable than what people make it out to be. I thought about having one just to have one as a backup. Can video and everything.

Heya,

Sorry the EOS-M, while I use it for DSO sometimes, wasn't used. POTN doesn't allow for other cameras to be used to able to list or add to galleries. The camera used is an ASI174MM (monochrome camera sensor). It's a USB camera. The EOS-M is far more advanced. This is just a chinese made monochrome sensor USB camera that I use for astrophotography in general as I capture it as video to create these images. I had to put a camera in the EXIF to allow it in the gallery (again, no generic option on POTN for anything other than common and new dSLR stuff). I use the M and Pentax 28mm for all my astro EXIF because its basically "impossible" if you know the camera (no tethering) and the lens (28mm isn't doing this hehe).

I was using the EOS-M for DSO, but it has one fatal flaw and that is that Canon crippled it for tethered work. So I cannot attach it via USB, tethered, and control it remotely. I don't know why Canon did this to the EOS-M, it has the same guts as the T4i basically (which is not crippled), but they decided to kill tethering in the EOS-M and it looks like they didn't enable it in the later EOS-M generations either. This is profoundly "What the heck!?" in my book because a mirrorless body is often desirable for astro purposes because of the size, weight and the distance to focus control you can get without all the extra space required in a mirrorbox. Sigh... oh well. Weird Canon choices.

Sorry for any confusion!

That said, ANY old USB webcam can do similar to the above. I bought my ASI174MM used for about $400. In astro, we put a lot more into our mounts and filters than we do cameras & lenses, so to speak. :)

And I have requested generic telescope & generic USB webcam options be added for EXIF purposes for astro shooters. Nothing yet.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorado ­ CJ
Senior Member
Avatar
666 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 283
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Northern Colorado
     
Aug 22, 2017 18:12 |  #23

WOW, I'm really going to have to get a HA filter (or telescope) some day! Great photos!

MalVeauX wrote in post #18433675 (external link)
Hey all,

Wanted to share some images of our little solar eclipse party here in Florida. We were not ready to travel with all the little kids, so we settled for the partial eclipse that we got at our location (approximately 90% coverage, was still great to see). I have a lot of equipment and set it all up and as people drove by they stopped to look, along with friends & family that gathered. We grilled steaks & veggies and had tons of iced tea to pass the hot day. The great shadow was eerie indeed, everyone was a little spooked. Even more spooky was how all the crickets, local animals, etc, stopped making noise during the peak of the eclipse--unnatural for them too, just made it even more spooky. We had a great time. We had a couple of scopes setup and one was setup with a monitor to view real time. Two scopes were setup for Hydrogen Alpha viewing and one was setup in White Light. We had lots of white light solar film filters that were visors to pass around too.

+++++++++++++++


My Photography Website
http://andrewmarjamaph​otography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I brought this thread back to LIFE
Avatar
6,513 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 1083
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
     
Aug 23, 2017 00:54 |  #24

Mal,

Was one of the scopes in this post the one you used to take the wonderful pictures of the Sun / Moon combination?

You have really great equipment, and the knowledge to know how to use all this fine equipment!

Thank you again for sharing.

I did look at your Flickr!!! :-)

MalVeauX wrote in post #18433682 (external link)
As this is outreach, I have to show the people of course!

Can there be an exception for such an event with the embed limit pretty please? :-D:oops:

There are many more, please if you care to see the instruments and everyone taking a look, browse Flickr. Thanks!

Very best,


Charles
Canon EOS 60D Gripped * Canon EOS XSi * Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntnthyme1
Goldmember
1,213 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 90
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Aug 23, 2017 05:19 |  #25

Awesome those are spectacular in my opinion.. thanks for sharing


My Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,710 posts
Gallery: 1104 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8056
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited 10 months ago by MalVeauX.
     
Aug 23, 2017 11:29 |  #26

Inspeqtor wrote in post #18434639 (external link)
Mal,
Was one of the scopes in this post the one you used to take the wonderful pictures of the Sun / Moon combination?

Yessir, I use inexpensive equipment. The big scope is the one I use to image the sun in high resolution in HA wavelength that you saw above; that big 120mm aperture refractor. I bought that thing for $150 or so used. The filter I use on it for HA imaging is over $1k but I got that used for around $850 plus a heat rejecting filter. I image in narrowband (single wavelength) so an old acrhomatic refractor does the same job as a super costly triplet APO does in that regard, so again, I'm using very cheap stuff to do this. The full disc images were done with that little wee PST scope (the gold one), and I bought that one used for about $400 or so (its a dedicated solar scope). I spent much more on the mount & filters than the scopes themselves. In this particular branch of photography, mounts are more important and are the bread & butter of everything, followed by filters, focusers, etc (some would argue scope, but my opinion is different). Scope quality comes next for me if you image in full spectrum. In narrowband you can get away with nearly anything (but you pay a lot for filters to do narrowband). Either way you'd be surprised how inexpensive this stuff is compared to what people pay for a new release Canon dSLR without a lens even. You can get into this kind of imaging for about $2500 all said and done with a decent setup. I do it a lot, so mine sits on a concrete pier 24/7. Carrying 40lbs of mount every day saves my poor back and gains lots of precious time.

I have a tutorial video I made where I use a $100 telescope that is only 400mm focal length and 80mm aperture to image the sun in narrowband (HA light) and how it looks when I capture the video data and what I do with it to get to the images you see above: https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=G-41RMTCdTE (external link)

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I brought this thread back to LIFE
Avatar
6,513 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 1083
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
     
Aug 23, 2017 13:21 |  #27

MalVeauX wrote in post #18434945 (external link)
Yessir, I use inexpensive equipment. The big scope is the one I use to image the sun in high resolution in HA wavelength that you saw above; that big 120mm aperture refractor. I bought that thing for $150 or so used. The filter I use on it for HA imaging is over $1k but I got that used for around $850 plus a heat rejecting filter. I image in narrowband (single wavelength) so an old acrhomatic refractor does the same job as a super costly triplet APO does in that regard, so again, I'm using very cheap stuff to do this. The full disc images were done with that little wee PST scope (the gold one), and I bought that one used for about $400 or so (its a dedicated solar scope). I spent much more on the mount & filters than the scopes themselves. In this particular branch of photography, mounts are more important and are the bread & butter of everything, followed by filters, focusers, etc (some would argue scope, but my opinion is different). Scope quality comes next for me if you image in full spectrum. In narrowband you can get away with nearly anything (but you pay a lot for filters to do narrowband). Either way you'd be surprised how inexpensive this stuff is compared to what people pay for a new release Canon dSLR without a lens even. You can get into this kind of imaging for about $2500 all said and done with a decent setup. I do it a lot, so mine sits on a concrete pier 24/7. Carrying 40lbs of mount every day saves my poor back and gains lots of precious time.

I have a tutorial video I made where I use a $100 telescope that is only 400mm focal length and 80mm aperture to image the sun in narrowband (HA light) and how it looks when I capture the video data and what I do with it to get to the images you see above: https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=G-41RMTCdTE (external link)

Very best,

Mal,

I am totally amazed with your talent. I now have an even higher respect for your knowledge with what you do.

I figured you had a very high $$$$$ telescope, you do not. I figured you also used a very high $$$$ camera, you do not.

Your knowledge with ALL the different software programs totally is also amazing.

I probably understood maybe 10% of what you talked about in your tutorial, but I did enjoy it. Will I ever be able to do this? Probably not. But thank you for giving everyone here a window to look in to see what it takes to show us the photos you produce.


Charles
Canon EOS 60D Gripped * Canon EOS XSi * Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MizzouMan_2000
Goldmember
1,651 posts
Likes: 234
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Peoria, IL Area
     
Aug 23, 2017 14:04 |  #28

HOLY CRAP! I was feeling pretty proud of my stuff until I opened this thread! Amazing photos! Stunning!



http://cisp.zenfolio.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MizzouMan_2000
Goldmember
1,651 posts
Likes: 234
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Peoria, IL Area
     
Aug 23, 2017 14:08 |  #29

MalVeauX wrote in post #18434394 (external link)
Heya,

Sorry the EOS-M, while I use it for DSO sometimes, wasn't used. POTN doesn't allow for other cameras to be used to able to list or add to galleries. The camera used is an ASI174MM (monochrome camera sensor). It's a USB camera. The EOS-M is far more advanced. This is just a chinese made monochrome sensor USB camera that I use for astrophotography in general as I capture it as video to create these images. I had to put a camera in the EXIF to allow it in the gallery (again, no generic option on POTN for anything other than common and new dSLR stuff). I use the M and Pentax 28mm for all my astro EXIF because its basically "impossible" if you know the camera (no tethering) and the lens (28mm isn't doing this hehe).

I was using the EOS-M for DSO, but it has one fatal flaw and that is that Canon crippled it for tethered work. So I cannot attach it via USB, tethered, and control it remotely. I don't know why Canon did this to the EOS-M, it has the same guts as the T4i basically (which is not crippled), but they decided to kill tethering in the EOS-M and it looks like they didn't enable it in the later EOS-M generations either. This is profoundly "What the heck!?" in my book because a mirrorless body is often desirable for astro purposes because of the size, weight and the distance to focus control you can get without all the extra space required in a mirrorbox. Sigh... oh well. Weird Canon choices.

Sorry for any confusion!

That said, ANY old USB webcam can do similar to the above. I bought my ASI174MM used for about $400. In astro, we put a lot more into our mounts and filters than we do cameras & lenses, so to speak. :)

And I have requested generic telescope & generic USB webcam options be added for EXIF purposes for astro shooters. Nothing yet.

Very best,

I also used the EOS-M with my measly setup and video recorded the entire event. I'm in the process of creating a time lapse video. The other fatal flaw with the EOS-M is that recording automatically stops every 29 or so minutes. I didn't realize this at the time and haven't looked to see if this can be changed.



http://cisp.zenfolio.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,710 posts
Gallery: 1104 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8056
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Aug 23, 2017 14:45 |  #30

Inspeqtor wrote in post #18435073 (external link)
Mal,

I am totally amazed with your talent. I now have an even higher respect for your knowledge with what you do.

I figured you had a very high $$$$$ telescope, you do not. I figured you also used a very high $$$$ camera, you do not.

Your knowledge with ALL the different software programs totally is also amazing.

I probably understood maybe 10% of what you talked about in your tutorial, but I did enjoy it. Will I ever be able to do this? Probably not. But thank you for giving everyone here a window to look in to see what it takes to show us the photos you produce.

No problem, my pleasure. I do this stuff often this way to help others with getting into it that have the interest. It's not that difficult and doesn't require insane equipment. We generally like to over-complicate things in terrestrial photography (heh heh) with needing really top shelf eqiupment and glass to basically run around taking snapshots on our day to day and it's extreme overkill, and from that very opinion I often hear the idea that it's too expensive or too time consuming to do something like astrophotography, when really it's just another way, and not nearly as expensive, and you learn a lot about photography as a science (understanding what resolution actually is, why pixel size matters, how to match focal-ratio and pixel size for ideal sampling, etc). We way, way overkill it in terrestrial photography I find. That's part of the fun though! It can be daunting to get into a form of photography like this, so I like to often do it with common, inexpensive and accessible equipment to show it can be done nicely on a dime (proverbially speaking...).

You actually don't even need a tracker for this. You can just let the sun drift through a wide FOV for a few seconds and capture video at high speed during that time and do the same thing. "Drift method" is the common name for it. Trackers just make it easier to fiddle and not realign with your subject every few moments.

The things you must have though are a video capable camera of some kind (faster the better) and a filter for the wavelength you want to image in (in this case, hydrogen alpha). The filter will always be the most costly part of this equation because you're asking for a filter that is as tight as limiting it down to just 656.28nm, 5 significant digits of precision. That costs money. But it's still cheaper than a typical high quality Canon lens like a 24-70 for example. These filters can be as little as $400ish to as much as several thousand.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,846 views & 75 likes for this thread
Solar Eclipse Party (Outreach) from Florida | Aug 21 2017
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is jaggerkat
422 guests, 285 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.