Yes.
saea501 ... spilled over a little on the panties  More info | Aug 24, 2017 06:30 | #8551 Yes. Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 24, 2017 08:08 | #8552 6 + stacked for minutes = ~12 equivalent  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 24, 2017 22:14 | #8553 Canon RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | ZE 2/100mm | ZE 2/35mm | ZE 1,4/85mm | CV 3,5/20mm Skopar | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Nikkor-S 55mm f/1,2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wouldn't it be handy if filter makers all just labelled ND filters by the number of stops of reduction in light transmission, instead of some being ND2 to ND1000, others being ND0.3 to ND3.0, still others being ND101 to ND110, and all of them needing to be converted to what you really want to know: f-stops. Be the person your dog thinks you are.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roseyposey Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 25, 2017 06:04 | #8555 Pippan wrote in post #18436487  Wouldn't it be handy if filter makers all just labelled ND filters by the number of stops of reduction in light transmission, instead of some being ND2 to ND1000, others being ND0.3 to ND3.0, still others being ND101 to ND110, and all of them needing to be converted to what you really want to know: f-stops. Totally agree! Olympus M1 MkII, Olympus M5 MkII: Lenses covering 8 - 300mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop  More info | Aug 25, 2017 08:13 | #8556 Pippan wrote in post #18436487 Wouldn't it be handy if filter makers all just labelled ND filters by the number of stops of reduction in light transmission, instead of some being ND2 to ND1000, others being ND0.3 to ND3.0, still others being ND101 to ND110, and all of them needing to be converted to what you really want to know: f-stops. it sure would make it less confusing...I am doing a speaking series on Long Exposure at local camera clubs...and this question comes up...and its hard to say what nomenclature means what between various brands...it would be nice if they didn't do that! Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Charlie Guess What! I'm Pregnant! More info Post edited over 3 years ago by Charlie. | Aug 25, 2017 10:38 | #8557 From my understanding, the ND 2-1000 system basically means 1/2 - 1/1000. Half the light = 1 stop. 1/1000 the light = 10 stop. It's a denominator system. Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2017 20:14 | #8558 Pippan wrote in post #18436487 Wouldn't it be handy if filter makers all just labelled ND filters by the number of stops of reduction in light transmission, instead of some being ND2 to ND1000, others being ND0.3 to ND3.0, still others being ND101 to ND110, and all of them needing to be converted to what you really want to know: f-stops. For me, I prefer this label... For example the pro ND 100, if the shot require 1/10 seconds. Canon RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | ZE 2/100mm | ZE 2/35mm | ZE 1,4/85mm | CV 3,5/20mm Skopar | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Nikkor-S 55mm f/1,2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 28, 2017 07:24 | #8559 Ah-keong wrote in post #18438655 For me, I prefer this label... For example the pro ND 100, if the shot require 1/10 seconds. So what is 6, 2/3 stop if I use this filter? Easy, just take 100 * 1/10s = 10s (6, 2/3 stop) maybe that's just me.  I see. That does make it easy. Although less so if it's an ND64. Be the person your dog thinks you are.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 28, 2017 10:05 | #8560 Lee Big Stopper (10 stops) on the Oregon Coast.  Bob Palermini
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 28, 2017 22:21 | #8561 that was one of the reasons I chose the 6, 2/3 stop over the 6 stop. Canon RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | ZE 2/100mm | ZE 2/35mm | ZE 1,4/85mm | CV 3,5/20mm Skopar | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Nikkor-S 55mm f/1,2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scatterbrained Cream of the Crop  More info | Aug 28, 2017 23:30 | #8562 Pippan wrote in post #18436487 Wouldn't it be handy if filter makers all just labelled ND filters by the number of stops of reduction in light transmission, instead of some being ND2 to ND1000, others being ND0.3 to ND3.0, still others being ND101 to ND110, and all of them needing to be converted to what you really want to know: f-stops. Singh Ray filters use stops. Why everyone else doesn't is beyond me. Can you imagine if photographic light meters gave you an EV value instead of an f-stop, or maybe just a lumens value? VanillaImaging.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2017 07:22 | #8563 The fog rolled in while I was at Peggy's fog giving me an opportunity to do a 30 sec exposure with my not so good 10 stop filter. The filter leaves a blue color that it not easy to eliminate. 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roseyposey Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 30, 2017 07:25 | #8564 M424canon wrote in post #18440624 The fog rolled in while I was at Peggy's fog giving me an opportunity to do a 30 sec exposure with my not so good 10 stop filter. The filter leaves a blue color that it not easy to eliminate. Thanks for looking. Lightroom should eliminate the blue cast - if you use that. Olympus M1 MkII, Olympus M5 MkII: Lenses covering 8 - 300mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paloika Senior Member More info Post edited over 3 years ago by paloika. (2 edits in all) | Sep 03, 2017 11:34 | #8565 ~Firestone~  DSC_4285-Edit-Edit by Floyd Manzano, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is Eddy3 640 guests, 335 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
