Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk 
Thread started 30 Sep 2017 (Saturday) 21:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Is this considered image thievery?

 
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Avatar
8,597 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 1749
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Oct 03, 2017 05:56 |  #16

I keep flip flopping on this one. I do tend to agree with the above which is what I was trying to say initially ... Flickr would probably not provide the API if the terms for image uploaders did not specifically address the issue.

But then the terms for the API user state that the API user must work with the photographer to get their permission. So what tools are provided to gain/give this permission?

This Facebook group is hosted by a photographer/lawyer and sometimes provides a good resource for these issues. Just beware that you likely won't hear from the lawyer herself, and some of the advice will claim to know exactly what is going on with no basis in reality.

https://m.facebook.com​/groups/39997410341244​9 (external link)

Might be worth a shot, as someone there might have dealt with it before. If you ask there, try to be concise but thorough in your first post. Rather than posting the terms, and examples, just link to them.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
26,713 posts
Gallery: 2445 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 9500
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Oct 05, 2017 06:26 |  #17

I suspect this is normal practice for any search engine, the benefit is you get more traffic if the user clicks on an image.

If you want your images to be searchable but to stop this particular site I am not sure you could do that from flickr. Perhaps from your own site by blocking their IP address, however all your site might see is a a request from the user IP.

Using a different gallery software on your own site should preclude this sort of usage but may give you less exposure.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,569 posts
Gallery: 81 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3762
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
Post edited 10 months ago by TeamSpeed. (18 edits in all)
     
Oct 05, 2017 07:34 |  #18

They are not directly making money on the images, so it would be hard to show that they are using one's images without permission to create revenue. Their revenue would be derived from traffic to their site as people use it to search. If the images link to the owner's actual content, it becomes doubly difficult to show where one has a loss due to their images showing up elsewhere.

This is taken from a copyright law site.

Google is a search engine that helps you locate content such as images and photos. It is not a content depository, and it is not a collection of public domain or copyright-free works. Google directs you to images and photos and other online content according to your search criteria. Once you find that perfect image or photo, you must treat that image like any other content you find online.

As such, you could just take Google out of this quote, and replace it with any other search-type engine/site. This means that Google, Yahoo, etc already have set legal precedent, and it would be nearly impossible to fight that precedent with any other type of search engine style site.

Where this site for the snakes might have legal copyright risk is in the area of Attribution. I feel that Flickr should also be supplying the owner info all the API returns now is the Flicker USER id, not the name), and that site needs to put an attribution footer under each image. That would eliminate all legal risk at that point, in my opinion however valuable that is.

Attribution Laws Summary wrote:
Attribution is the act of regarding a quality or feature as a characteristic or inherent part of someone or something. The act of attributing, especially the act of establishing a particular person as the creator of a work of art.

Here is the Flickr API Return, it would be nice if it also returned the user name, but that might introduce other issues, like identify info. At the very least, the snake DB site could put "Flickr Owner: #####@###" under each photo, but that is pretty cryptic.

FLICKR SEARCH wrote:
<photos page="2" pages="89" perpage="10" total="881">
<photo id="2636" owner="47058503995@N01​"
secret="a123456" server="2" title="test_04"
ispublic="1" isfriend="0" isfamily="0" />
<photo id="2635" owner="47058503995@N01​"
secret="b123456" server="2" title="test_03"
ispublic="0" isfriend="1" isfamily="1" />
<photo id="2633" owner="47058503995@N01​"
secret="c123456" server="2" title="test_01"
ispublic="1" isfriend="0" isfamily="0" />
<photo id="2610" owner="12037949754@N01​"
secret="d123456" server="2" title="00_tall"
ispublic="1" isfriend="0" isfamily="0" />
</photos>

This attribution law is one of the reasons Pekka, I assume, requires us to always attribute the owner of any image we place in our posts if they are not our own. He is asking us to follow basic law, and also remove any risk of legal action, despite the fact he runs this site free of charge and doesn't derive revenue from the images, directly or indirectly. No to mention, it is simply the proper thing to do, despite laws.

Also, as LHB points out above, this is one of the API terms from Flickr.

FLICKR Terms wrote:
Comply with any requirements or restrictions imposed on usage of the photos by their respective owners. Remember, Flickr doesn't own the images - Flickr users do. Although the Flickr APIs can be used to provide you with access to Flickr user photos, neither Flickr's provision of the Flickr APIs to you nor your use of the Flickr APIs override the photo owners' requirements and restrictions, which may include "all rights reserved" notices (attached to each photo by default when uploaded to Flickr), Creative Commons licenses or other terms and conditions that may be agreed upon between you and the owners. In ALL cases, you are solely responsible for making use of Flickr photos in compliance with the photo owners' requirements or restrictions. If you use Flickr photos for a commercial purpose, the photos must be marked with a Creative Commons license that allows for such use, and also comply with the requirements for each license, unless otherwise agreed upon between you and the owner. You can read more about this here: www.creativecommons.or​g (external link) or www.flickr.com/creativ​ecommons (external link).

So it is possible that the snakedb site isn't complying with the Flickr terms, and if there is concern around this, report the site to Flickr. While the site may possibly be legal in terms of copyright infringement, they might be breaking Flickr terms, which is also legally actionable.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dalantech
Goldmember
Avatar
4,440 posts
Gallery: 194 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 301
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Bacoli, Italy
Post edited 10 months ago by Dalantech.
     
Oct 08, 2017 07:32 |  #19

Kurt this is an example of image theft (external link) -and because it seems to be just an add site it's almost impossible to get a hold of someone to take it down. Fortunately it's not one of my better photos:

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2526/4143486687_043c18c22c_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/7j9s​eD  (external link) Slurp V (external link) by John Kimbler (external link), on Flickr

My Gallery (external link)
My Blog (external link)
Macro Tutorials (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,569 posts
Gallery: 81 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3762
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Oct 08, 2017 23:03 as a reply to  @ Dalantech's post |  #20

Have you tried to report them to Amazon?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dalantech
Goldmember
Avatar
4,440 posts
Gallery: 194 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 301
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Bacoli, Italy
Post edited 10 months ago by Dalantech. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 09, 2017 06:21 |  #21

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18468746 (external link)
Have you tried to report them to Amazon?

Not sure that would help unless the domain is hosted on their servers.

Edit: They are a member in an Amazon advertising group, but Amazon wouldn't have any control over them (other than to potentially pull adds). Most of the advertising on that domain isn't coming from Amazon. They have a contact form, but the site is so "sleazy" they'll probably just sell my email address to spammers.

Edit #2: On the off chance that they might be able to contact the owner of the site I sent Amazon an email via their associate program contact form.


My Gallery (external link)
My Blog (external link)
Macro Tutorials (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,569 posts
Gallery: 81 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3762
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Oct 09, 2017 07:23 |  #22

They are hosted by GoDaddy, you might be able to report to the GoDaddy abuse helpdesk.

Contact Information
Registrant Contact
Name: Voislav Avramovski
Organization:
Mailing Address: Socijalisticka Zora 48, Skopje Skopje 1000 MK
Phone: 38970546803
Ext:
Fax:
Fax Ext:
Email:voya@live.com
Admin Contact
Name: Voislav Avramovski
Organization:
Mailing Address: Socijalisticka Zora 48, Skopje Skopje 1000 MK
Phone: 38970546803
Ext:
Fax:
Fax Ext:
Email:voya@live.com
Tech Contact
Name: Voislav Avramovski
Organization:
Mailing Address: Socijalisticka Zora 48, Skopje Skopje 1000 MK
Phone: 38970546803
Ext:
Fax:
Fax Ext:
Email:voya@live.com
Registrar
WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
URL: http://www.godaddy.com (external link)
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
IANA ID: 146
Abuse Contact Email:abuse@godaddy.co​m
Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dalantech
Goldmember
Avatar
4,440 posts
Gallery: 194 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 301
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Bacoli, Italy
     
Oct 09, 2017 15:40 |  #23

Amazon's response:

Hello,

Thank you for letting us know that this member may be violating our Operating Agreement.

I've sent this information to the appropriate department for investigation. Help like yours is invaluable as we work to ensure that all members are working within our guidelines.

We look forward to seeing you again soon.

We'd appreciate your feedback. Please use the buttons below to vote about your experience today.

Best regards,
Mallory M.


My Gallery (external link)
My Blog (external link)
Macro Tutorials (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dalantech
Goldmember
Avatar
4,440 posts
Gallery: 194 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 301
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Bacoli, Italy
     
Oct 19, 2017 10:48 |  #24

Here's an example of what you were concerned about Kurt. Many moons ago I gave the NASA Earth Observatory web site permission to use a couple of my images for an article on bees (external link). One of them is this shot:

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1438/1093856202_113843bb8c_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2EEi​kG  (external link) Bees in the Pumpkin Flowers series 1-6 (external link) by John Kimbler (external link), on Flickr

P.S. I know the light sucks -I took it over a decade ago. Well a blogger decided to direct link to the same image for a blog post (external link), effectively removing my copyright while also stealing bandwidth from the Earth Observatory. I left a comment on the post explaining how to use the sharing function at Flickr, and hopefully the author of the blog will change the image link. Funny that there is a photo credit to the Earth Observatory under the photo, but that's not how it should be done.

My Gallery (external link)
My Blog (external link)
Macro Tutorials (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,569 posts
Gallery: 81 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3762
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
Post edited 10 months ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Oct 19, 2017 11:26 |  #25

In the US, hotlinking an image (not really different from putting a hyperlink to the image, just rendered differently) has been ruled as not being an infringement. Now laws elsewhere might take a different stance. That being said, we actually have 2 legal precedents laid out that are in conflict with each other, the 2007 ruling from a higher court vs the 1998 ruling from a lower court.

http://timjackson.pro …hers-be-worried-about-it/ (external link)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dalantech
Goldmember
Avatar
4,440 posts
Gallery: 194 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 301
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Bacoli, Italy
     
Oct 19, 2017 15:15 |  #26

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18476045 (external link)
In the US, hotlinking an image (not really different from putting a hyperlink to the image, just rendered differently) has been ruled as not being an infringement. Now laws elsewhere might take a different stance. That being said, we actually have 2 legal precedents laid out that are in conflict with each other, the 2007 ruling from a higher court vs the 1998 ruling from a lower court.

http://timjackson.pro …hers-be-worried-about-it/ (external link)

I don't jump straight to legal action -I try to handle it nicely. But at best the blogger is eating up the NASA Earth Observatory's bandwidth, at worst they're doing that and eroding my copyright.


My Gallery (external link)
My Blog (external link)
Macro Tutorials (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sideshot
Member
Avatar
88 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Nov 2017
Post edited 8 months ago by Sideshot.
     
Dec 09, 2017 09:52 |  #27

Where did you get the pics of a pit viper ? were you behind glass ?

The way it seems with flickr API is they allow some hotlinking as a way to get more traffic and use. You use a free service(flickr) and they have to exploit you somehow to make up for the free. You are ether the customer or the product, with this you are the product.

Normally the issue with hotlinking is it can burn up your bandwith, but you are riding on flickrs "free" bandwidth so it is up to them to deal with that.
I host all of my own stuff, sometimes I will see a large use of bandwidth from hotlinking and I will change the link. Most sites that hotlink are low grade 3rd world sites that will get no traffic anyway. It is usually forums that will burn up some bandwidth.

The internet is like the wild west if you have nice images they will get stolen/used/"borrowed" just consider it a complainant. keep them low res water marks that are hard to remove make them less desirable to take without asking.

-edit- The site that is using the pics seems halfway legit, might be a good friend to make. Never know where clients come from, usually not 3rd world Viagra websites but snake experts ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,795 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 503
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
Dec 21, 2017 00:25 |  #28

Probably not illegal but common courtesy to ask the photographer if they mind images being used this way on a site.


Toby
Canon 5D MKIV
Olympus EM-1 MKII
Flickr collections (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

14,768 views & 22 likes for this thread
Is this considered image thievery?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mphunt
779 guests, 264 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.