Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 17 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 10:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!

 
markesc
Goldmember
1,070 posts
Gallery: 211 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 6220
Joined Feb 2014
     
Oct 17, 2017 01:18 |  #6856


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
itw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,163 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1279
Joined Nov 2013
Location: NH / FLA
Post edited 9 months ago by itw.
     
Oct 18, 2017 09:32 |  #6857

Keltab wrote in post #18474442 (external link)
Okay Jeff - I know how this should work... You can choose your avatar per quote or post. Use the one that most represents your feeling at the time. Just imagine - the first one for when that annoying photog steps in front of you right at the moment you wanted to take a pic... and the last one for when that photog steps in front of you at the exact moment you were going to take a pic of an angry moose - who then stepped on that annoying photog!

Heh, heh, heh.... I don't suppose the circles this guy runs in has many other togs around to get in the way ! ;-)a


You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
14,032 posts
Gallery: 2022 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 40161
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 18, 2017 12:04 |  #6858

itw wrote in post #18475299 (external link)
Heh, heh, heh.... I don't suppose the circles this guy runs in has many other togs around to get in the way ! ;-)a

True Ned... sometimes !! Its true in wildlife photography being alone is the best way to get the animal looking directly at you, which is my preference, But I do shoot with a friend from time to time and we have worked out that kink for the most part. Mutual respect is key. He does take the eyes off me for 50% of my shots which is a far trade for the time spent.

Sometimes ya just get closer lol

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Photo from Pondrader's gallery.


Jeff ........7D Mark II, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
1,070 posts
Gallery: 211 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 6220
Joined Feb 2014
     
Oct 18, 2017 22:53 |  #6859


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,163 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1279
Joined Nov 2013
Location: NH / FLA
     
Oct 20, 2017 08:11 as a reply to  @ Pondrader's post |  #6860

I recall you mentioning your shooting partner in a couple of threads.... I figured you guys had things worked out. Excellent team !


You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
14,032 posts
Gallery: 2022 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 40161
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 20, 2017 10:24 |  #6861

itw wrote in post #18476689 (external link)
I recall you mentioning your shooting partner in a couple of threads.... I figured you guys had things worked out. Excellent team !

We do Ned.. I met him in the bush shooting Moose one sunny day in October a few years ago. He's from the city and I'm all country. lol
For the most part its all good. Gives me something to shoot when theres nothing going on.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Jeff ........7D Mark II, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,212 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 3306
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland OR USA
     
Oct 20, 2017 19:29 |  #6862

markesc wrote in post #18475738 (external link)
thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by markesc in
./showthread.php?p=184​75738&i=i179420315
forum: Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

Nice! Where is this from, Mark? Looks pretty far out into the western 'burbs...


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
How do I change this?
Avatar
13,197 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5581
Joined Oct 2009
     
Oct 20, 2017 20:07 |  #6863

Just looking


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
How do I change this?
Avatar
13,197 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5581
Joined Oct 2009
     
Oct 20, 2017 20:08 |  #6864

Sunset


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jccj58
Goldmember
Avatar
1,704 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 3808
Joined Apr 2010
Location: South Florida
     
Oct 20, 2017 21:05 |  #6865

Couple of Florida scrub Jays.

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4449/37388135982_cb2a6f00f9_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/YXRY​fb  (external link) Florida Scrub Jays (external link) by John (external link), on Flickr

---------------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
12,064 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2838
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
Post edited 8 months ago by Tom Reichner.
     
Oct 21, 2017 13:44 |  #6866

Recently, I've been seeing some complaints here on POTN about the bokeh produced by the 100-400 v2. There is no problem with this lens whatsoever. Same as with any lens, if you want nice bokeh you need to choose your backgrounds carefully and make sure that you shoot in light that is conducive to pleasing bokeh.

If we do our part, the 100-400 v2 most certainly does it's part, and process very nice background blur. If we think that we should be able to have anything at all in the background, and it's the lenses job to blur it out nicely, then we need to re-think our approach to image-making.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


.

"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,102 posts
Likes: 383
Joined Aug 2009
     
Oct 21, 2017 15:01 as a reply to  @ Tom Reichner's post |  #6867

While that's a nice example of 100-400 II bokeh, it's much harder to get pleasing bokeh with this lens than a 24-70 or 70-200. Like its predecedor, the bokeh just feels less smooth and more nervous. Not that I'm going to ditch mine, because it's still a great lens, but it's not the one I reach for when I want BOKEH (channeling Kai Wong).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lijoec
Senior Member
Avatar
648 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 1704
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Long Island
     
Oct 21, 2017 15:13 |  #6868

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4452/37128079124_e2148e0a13_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/YyT7​pf  (external link) IMG_3004 (external link) by Joseph Colozzo (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4491/37580366590_26f491d1b2_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ZfRc​H1  (external link) IMG_3021 (external link) by Joseph Colozzo (external link), on Flickr

Cheers,
Joe
"Image Editing OK"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
12,064 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2838
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
Post edited 8 months ago by Tom Reichner.
     
Oct 21, 2017 17:53 |  #6869

mike_d wrote in post #18477718 (external link)
While that's a nice example of 100-400 II bokeh, it's much harder to get pleasing bokeh with this lens than a 24-70 or 70-200. Like its predecedor, the bokeh just feels less smooth and more nervous. Not that I'm going to ditch mine, because it's still a great lens, but it's not the one I reach for when I want BOKEH (channeling Kai Wong).

I don't see how the comparison to the 24-70 is valid, because you cannot compare images of the same scene, shot from the same position and shot at the same focal length and the same aperture, due to the fact that these lenses' focal lengths do not overlap at all.

Your comparison to the 70-200 is, of course, only valid when shooting the same subject with the same background from the same position at the same focal length and the same aperture. . It would be preposterous to compare an f5.6 lens to an f4 lens or an f2.8 lens unless you are stopping down the faster lenses.

My 100-400 v2, when used at 400mm, gives me very similar bokeh to that which I get from my 400mm f2.8, when I stop the 400 f2.8 down to f5.6.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
How do I change this?
Avatar
13,197 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5581
Joined Oct 2009
     
Oct 21, 2017 22:23 |  #6870

Curious


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,096,899 views & 21,219 likes for this thread
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is pabxabudhabi
390 guests, 278 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.