Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 24 Jul 2017 (Monday) 13:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Engagement photo - Critique Reqested

 
slikscott
Member
72 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jul 24, 2017 13:26 |  #1

Good afternoon, below is a shot taken from my 1st engagement shoot. Looking for constructive feedback.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Scott O. Amateur Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,384 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 246
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jul 24, 2017 14:02 |  #2

Overall it is good :) I would have added a bit more light to their faces. I would darken down the grass right behind them.

He almost has RED ear. I hate it when that happens *LOL* His left shoe bothers me but I guess I am quirky about detached body parts.

Work on the editing a bit :)


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksbal
Goldmember
Avatar
2,271 posts
Gallery: 258 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 1469
Joined Sep 2010
Location: N.E. Kansas
Post edited 11 months ago by ksbal. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 24, 2017 14:31 |  #3

Composition is fine, positions are ok, not stellar, but not bad.
Good you got to their eye level.

it is clear that a higher number F stop, (like f8 or more) was used as Everything is in focus... The trees and grass behind them are very clear. They compete for what should be the focus of the image, the couple. Ideally, using a lower number/larger diameter f stop would throw the background out of focus, and keep your attention on the couple.

I think a fill flash was used, but with the higher fstop in play, it still didn't expose the couple properly. They are underexposed and so the grass behind is over powering them a touch.

a speedlight in an umbrella positioned camera right would have helped to add some light correctly on their faces, and bring the exposure up, or a reflector may have worked as well.

Here is an example post showing the difference in using a more telephoto style, along with a larger(like f2.8-5.6) f stop will blur the background. a 50mm may have been used here, but it needed to be at f1.8 - 2.8 to help throw the background out of focus- and good technique to make sure the faces were in focus.

https://photography-on-the.net …07&mg=265650&i=​i149576102


YN622 English User Guide/Manual by Clive
https://drive.google.c​om …Ig0gMMzZFaDVlZ1​VNTE0/view (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
erikfig
Goldmember
Avatar
2,140 posts
Likes: 191
Joined May 2012
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Jul 24, 2017 15:53 |  #4

Good Composition.

Background is too bright and too busy. This can be a keeper with some post. I would've use a softbox or similar to light their faces.


Who cares about my gear?
FlickR (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,592 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 385
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Post edited 11 months ago by jcolman.
     
Jul 24, 2017 16:37 |  #5

I'm going to disagree about the "good composition" comments. To be frank, I think the compostion is not very good at all. When shooting couples, a good rule of thumb is to try to place them so that their bodies form a "triangle" shape, bringing them together. However, if you do want to shoot them sitting, don't have the man leaning against a tree.

Example

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/UYFVUfP.jpg

When choosing to shoot in a park or other outdoor setting, look carefully at your background and pick the best spot.

Example:

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/9186cbZ.jpg

Depth of field can be sharp depending on your intent.

example:

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/o0Dqp5k.jpg

Or use a shallow DOF for a more romantic image

example:
IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/tesVUkT.jpg

Hope these help

www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jethr0
Senior Member
Avatar
920 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Likes: 513
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
     
Jul 24, 2017 16:44 |  #6

image editing ok?


www.jefflowe.ca (external link)
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jeff​lowe.ca (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,384 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 246
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jul 24, 2017 16:55 |  #7

The is an odd color forming a straight line by her knuckles. Not sure what that is and looks like she has a watch shadow for her tan.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Daniel24
Hatchling
4 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2017
Location: Ashburn
     
Jul 24, 2017 19:55 |  #8

The last thing that many couples want to do after making a big investment in an engagement ring is to spend another small fortune on engagement pictures.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Elliephoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slikscott
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
72 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jul 24, 2017 22:00 as a reply to  @ Jethr0's post |  #9

Sure


Scott O. Amateur Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,426 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 948
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jul 25, 2017 00:02 |  #10

I'd crop out the swath of white sky.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FFFCFF
Member
186 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Likes: 339
Joined Dec 2016
Location: Warsaw/Poland
     
Jul 25, 2017 03:28 |  #11

Do not have time now. 2 minutes LR job can fix it a little.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Still learning English. Sorry for language bugs. My job: alldatarecovery.pl (external link) my hobby: flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Point-n-shoot-n
Goldmember
1,644 posts
Likes: 226
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Oct 26, 2017 21:54 |  #12

I always shoot as wide open as I can to make the photos look as 3D as possible with a nice creamy background. Keep the focus on the eyes and the rest is easy!


Canon 5D mk iii, Canon 5d classic, Rebel XTI 400D 18-55 kit lens, Canon EF 85mm 1:1.8, Canon EF 17-40 F4L, Quantaray 70-300 1:4-5.6 LD, Canon 70-200 F2.8 iiL, Canon EF135 F2 L, Canon 200 F2 L, Tamron 28-75 1:2.8 , 2 alien bee 800's, 430 EXii, 580 EXii, rectangular and octo softboxes, assorted umbrellas, portable backdrops, radio triggers and still adding.............

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Silver-Halide
Senior Member
786 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 213
Joined Jan 2015
     
Oct 26, 2017 23:25 |  #13

Looks like you got a great expression on both their faces and that's great. ;-)a

To the pose: i'd tilt their heads together.

Overall thing I would have changed is adding more light. I've become fond of saying lately: 'quantity of light is more important than quality of light.' Sure I love my softboxes, diffusion panels, and all that good stuff, but run with what you brung if all you can do is throw a strobe on them and kill off some more ambient light. The contrast between highlight and shadow in the background keeps pulling my attention away from the couple.


Echoes in Eternity LLC | Tucson and Southern Arizona Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,226 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 6043
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Oct 29, 2017 06:20 |  #14

Daniel24 wrote in post #18410340 (external link)
The last thing that many couples want to do after making a big investment in an engagement ring is to spend another small fortune on engagement pictures.
thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by Daniel24 in
./showthread.php?p=184​10340&i=i81841945
forum: Weddings & Other Family Events

This one's pretty hot.....exposure got away from you a bit.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com …282@N06/with/38​203470844/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colin ­ Glover
Goldmember
1,251 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southport nr Liverpool United Kingdom
     
Nov 01, 2017 12:49 |  #15

I'd do one or both of two things: 1). Up exposure by a step and then lower highlghts to bring the brightness back down. This will lighten the faces. Or 2). Use an adjustment brush set to dodge (lighten) to lift the shadows on the face. Did you lift shadows in this edit? You might get away with doing that then reducing highlights if needed.

Great shot, and a timeless expression on their faces.


Canon EOS 70D, Canon EOS 600D, EF-S 18-55 ii, EF 55-200 USM ii, EF-S 75-300 iii, Tamron 28-80, Sigma 70-210. Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, EF-S 55-250, Raynox Macro adapter, Neewer filters (CPL, UV, FLD & ND4), Fuji HS20 EXR (30X zoom ) & cable release, Yongnuo 560 iii & Luxon 9800A manual flashguns for the Fuji, Hama Star 63 tripod, Hongdek RC-6 remote control, Velbon DF 40 www.point-n-shoot.co.uk website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,801 views & 3 likes for this thread
Engagement photo - Critique Reqested
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is jeroe
435 guests, 304 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.