Another photo recreation here from me (sorry there is likely going to be a few if these with my fav shots of callum)
Isla today

Callum 2013

Really cool. Congrats again Eddie!
Nov 09, 2017 10:22 | #7096 xpfloyd wrote in post #18492579 Another photo recreation here from me (sorry there is likely going to be a few if these with my fav shots of callum) Isla today ![]() Callum 2013 ![]() Really cool. Congrats again Eddie! focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Eddie xpfloyd lookalike More info | Nov 09, 2017 10:27 | #7097 Thanks Carlo, hopefully I come up with some original stuff but in the mean time it’s repeats of previous ideas Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2017 10:34 | #7098 xpfloyd wrote in post #18492623 Thanks Carlo, hopefully I come up with some original stuff but in the mean time it’s repeats of previous ideas ![]() Nah I'm a huge fan of reboots of old photos focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Nov 09, 2017 10:39 | #7099 Three weeks away from the 24-105g, anybody besides me in ?? flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2017 11:04 | #7100 6 shoots in 5 days. Wish me luck. I rented a Siggy 135 and will get a chance to put this thing to use! focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 5 years ago by vinmunoz. | Nov 09, 2017 11:26 | #7101 TRhoads wrote in post #18492531 LOL...yeah, Looks like astro! these are all you need. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Nov 09, 2017 11:27 | #7102 Went to the cemetery today. Both parents and 2 (of 3) brothers are there. Image hosted by forum (885088) © MedicineMan4040 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 5 years ago by David Arbogast. | Nov 09, 2017 12:01 | #7103 mystik610 wrote in post #18492657 6 shoots in 5 days. Wish me luck. I rented a Siggy 135 and will get a chance to put this thing to use! Wow! You still have a full-time day job, right? How do you have time for all that work? David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2017 12:05 | #7104 mystik610 wrote in post #18492657 6 shoots in 5 days. Wish me luck. I rented a Siggy 135 and will get a chance to put this thing to use! sounds suicidal Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OoDee Senior Member More info | Nov 09, 2017 12:11 | #7105 TRhoads wrote in post #18492517 and this is why I need to have my sensor cleaned...it is almost unusable right now at anything greater than f5.6...more than that and I spend more time cloning spots than I do shooting, editing or posting...its ridiculous... Hosted photo: posted by TRhoads in ./showthread.php?p=18492517&i=i34732281 forum: Sony Digital Cameras I've always wondered why mirrorless camera sensors remain exposed even if you turn the power off. DSLRs (at least Canon) have that physical curtain that falls onto the sensor when you turn the camera off. Very effective in keeping the dust out, regardless of the circumstances you change your lenses in.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 09, 2017 12:18 | #7106 OoDee wrote in post #18492700 I've always wondered why mirrorless camera sensors remain exposed even if you turn the power off. DSLRs (at least Canon) have that physical curtain that falls onto the sensor when you turn the camera off. Very effective in keeping the dust out, regardless of the circumstances you change your lenses in. There must be a reason for why mirrorless cameras don't have it... well, that curtain is the mirror that projects the image into the viewfinder...to have a moving element like that requires depth to the camera body, depth that mirrorless wants to eliminate. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2017 12:21 | #7107 OoDee wrote in post #18492700 I've always wondered why mirrorless camera sensors remain exposed even if you turn the power off. DSLRs (at least Canon) have that physical curtain that falls onto the sensor when you turn the camera off. Very effective in keeping the dust out, regardless of the circumstances you change your lenses in. There must be a reason for why mirrorless cameras don't have it... risk damaging the shutter. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Eddie xpfloyd lookalike More info | Nov 09, 2017 12:26 | #7108 When I was shooting that aurora shot the other night I didn’t realise until I started driving home but I managed to get dog s#!t on both feet, my tripod leg and the front of my photo rucksack. I then got it on the back of my drivers seat when I placed the bag in the car. (Totally worth it though Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OoDee Senior Member More info Post edited over 5 years ago by OoDee. | Nov 09, 2017 12:29 | #7109 TRhoads wrote in post #18492709 well, that curtain is the mirror that projects the image into the viewfinder...to have a moving element like that requires depth to the camera body, depth that mirrorless wants to eliminate. Nope. If you look behind the mirror, there's a plastic curtain in front of the sensor. I'm guessing it's the shutter curtain programmed to stretch over the sensor when you turn your camera off.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OoDee Senior Member More info Post edited over 5 years ago by OoDee. | Nov 09, 2017 12:31 | #7110 Charlie wrote in post #18492712 risk damaging the shutter. DSLR's have a mirror in front, while mirrorless have the shutter right at the mount. if you change your lens and accidentally tilt the lens wrong or get your finger inside a little, you'de damage the shutter. That could be one explanation. Though the same risks apply vis-a-vis to an exposed sensor, the only difference being the damaged item.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1454 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||