Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 07 Nov 2017 (Tuesday) 12:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon 16-35 F2.8 refurbish or F4 New

 
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 180
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan
     
Nov 14, 2017 18:28 |  #16

I love my 16-35mm f/4 IS. I bought it when the lens first came out for a trip to Alaska, so there was no refurbished option then. Unless you absolutely need f/2.8, I would go with the f/4 version but do as others suggest and get a refurbished copy. If a refurb is good enough for you with the f/2.8 version, it should also be acceptable for the f/4.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HodjPodj
Member
55 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Sep 2017
Location: Denver/USA
     
Nov 14, 2017 18:38 |  #17

I've done a TON of research on both of these as I am looking to get one as well and unless you need the 2.8 for low light or bokeh, the f/4 is better in almost every aspect. Also, just from reading all of the posts above, it's making me want to run out and buy one at this very moment!


Old Town Photo
Gear: Canon 6D, Canon T2i (Self modded, LPF2 removed/replaced with Baader IR Cut Filter for Astro), Canon EF 100mm f/2, Rokinon 24mm f/1.4 for Canon, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 for Canon, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, Gitzo GT1532 Mountaineer tripod w/Gitzo GH1382QD Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,249 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Nov 14, 2017 23:52 |  #18

The 16-35mm f/4L IS USM and the 16-35mm f/2.8L USM "III" have the best image quality and sharpness from corner to corner and edge to edge.

The original 16-35mm f/2.8L, f/2.8 "II" and 17-40mm f/4L simply aren't as sharp throughout their image area. I'd pass on those.

I'll be buying the 16-35mm f/4L when I upgrade my full frame camera. I prefer it's smaller size, lighter weight, lower price, smaller diameter filters and the IS makes it quite versatile. I rarely need smaller than f/4 wide angle lens, anyway. Usually I'm stopping that type of lens down to a middle aperture for increased depth of field... not using it wide open.

f/2.8 might be important to someone doing a lot of night photography or photojournalism. But I don't.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - ZENFOLIO (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
Avatar
3,020 posts
Gallery: 477 photos
Likes: 6355
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Maryland
Post edited 8 months ago by MatthewK.
     
Nov 15, 2017 05:03 |  #19

So a long time ago I had a 16-35 f/4, and I sold it when I purchased the 16-35 f/2.8 III (I know the OP is talking about the vII, but the general feature set is the same as the vIII).

A short month later, when I realized that f/2.8, increased bulk and cost, and lack of IS made nearly zero impact on my photography, the f/2.8 III was sold and I adopted a refurb f/4 IS.

The 16-35 f/4 IS is a rock-solid lens. Given it's cost:benefit ratio, we're lucky to have such an optic available to us.

(I've had zero issues with this refurb, or any Canon refurb. Buy with confidence)


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

6,968 views & 3 likes for this thread
Canon 16-35 F2.8 refurbish or F4 New
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Passing Thru
352 guests, 267 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.