Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 31 Dec 2009 (Thursday) 21:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

The Official Shoot the Moon Thread

 
tuffty
Member
Avatar
133 posts
Gallery: 75 photos
Likes: 410
Joined Sep 2015
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
Dec 04, 2017 02:32 as a reply to  @ post 18510065 |  #4711

Nice work dude... terrain where I live doesn't really lend itself for shots like that... very jealous :)

<tuffty/>




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
WestCoastCannuck
Senior Member
Avatar
463 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 2458
Joined Jan 2017
Location: Victoria, Canada
     
Dec 04, 2017 03:41 |  #4712

Huh... I did not even know it was a "supermoon". lol

Shot with Sony A99ii + Minolta 400/4.5 + 2X TC. Only fair seeing conditions, 87% humidity, angle at 37 degrees. Later, when it was higher, we were fogged in. 99.5% illumination.

This is a stack of 11 images. (Best 11 of 47) Processed in PIPP, Autostakkert!2, Astra Image, and LR6. (Yeah.. I like messing with moon shots!) Is it better than a single image? Yes. Is it worth all the extra work? Probably not. :rolleyes:

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4554/37939631165_e094a61473_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …939631165/in/ph​otostream/  (external link)
Moon 2017-12-03 99.5 % (external link) by Mike Nash (external link) on Flickr

flickr (external link)
A99ii|Tam15-30|M28-135|M35-105|M80-200G|SAL70400G|Σ50 1.4|CZ135/1.8|Minolta 300/2.8|Minolta 400/4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17604
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
Post edited over 4 years ago by navydoc.
     
Dec 04, 2017 09:34 |  #4713

The sky was hazy when I took this 'supermoon' shot on Saturday, Dec 2nd. It was also too high in the sky to get anything in the foreground for added interest. You can see the glow from the haze though.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
STICKY2
Junior Member
26 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 37
Joined Nov 2017
Post edited over 4 years ago by STICKY2.
     
Dec 04, 2017 22:04 |  #4714
bannedPermanent ban

Not much contrast due to full moon light but...

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4525/37956744105_1f800dffd0_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ZQ7e​Cv  (external link)
Moon 3.12.17 (external link) by Flick R Sucks (external link), on Flickr

Crop...

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4567/23978811457_383e577a5b_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/CwVF​eK  (external link) Moon 3.12.17.crop (external link) by Flick R Sucks (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
manbhat
Member
42 posts
Likes: 57
Joined May 2017
     
Dec 05, 2017 20:23 |  #4715

From yesterday


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBigDog
Goldmember
2,068 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 677
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sicklerville, NJ, USA
     
Dec 06, 2017 05:43 |  #4716

Super moon shot, just missed it....

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4570/37941981875_19fee0fcd0_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ZNNz​ki  (external link) Fly me too the moon (external link) by Christian Gross (external link), on Flickr

Christian
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Member, Full Disc Aviation (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)Aviation Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I am 5-6 days late
Avatar
14,082 posts
Gallery: 149 photos
Likes: 7103
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Dec 06, 2017 07:28 |  #4717

TheBigDog wrote in post #18511719 (external link)
Super moon shot, just missed it....

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ZNNz​ki  (external link) Fly me too the moon (external link) by Christian Gross (external link), on Flickr

Lovely shot... I feel your pain!


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WestCoastCannuck
Senior Member
Avatar
463 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 2458
Joined Jan 2017
Location: Victoria, Canada
     
Dec 06, 2017 14:48 |  #4718

In this case Stacking was of little benefit given all the work.

A99ii + Minolta 400/4.5 + 2X TC

Just a single image.
Moon, 2017-12-06


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


10 image stack (and lots of time and processing)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
A99ii|Tam15-30|M28-135|M35-105|M80-200G|SAL70400G|Σ50 1.4|CZ135/1.8|Minolta 300/2.8|Minolta 400/4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
10,373 posts
Gallery: 2633 photos
Likes: 16836
Joined Dec 2011
Post edited over 4 years ago by Pagman.
     
Dec 06, 2017 18:46 |  #4719

Not super moon and not my best - cant wait to try it on my tripod, this one was hand held without any IS/VR.
Oh and AF instead of LV manual.

P.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Nikon D7200 / AFS-D 300F4 / MkII 1.4X TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
strightleg
Member
94 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 464
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Boston
     
Dec 07, 2017 21:26 |  #4720

Little late for the super moon this mornings shot


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WestCoastCannuck
Senior Member
Avatar
463 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 2458
Joined Jan 2017
Location: Victoria, Canada
     
Dec 08, 2017 05:42 |  #4721

Well... I picked up another A77ii. Man, I have missed this camera for my moon shooting. ;)

92% humidity..... way too much turbulence for stacking. But I am pretty darn happy with this single exposure. :)

A77ii + Minolta 400/4.5 + 2X TC


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


flickr (external link)
A99ii|Tam15-30|M28-135|M35-105|M80-200G|SAL70400G|Σ50 1.4|CZ135/1.8|Minolta 300/2.8|Minolta 400/4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,431 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4766
Joined Dec 2008
Post edited over 4 years ago by LV Moose.
     
Dec 09, 2017 00:15 |  #4722

WestCoastCannuck wrote in post #18512126 (external link)
In this case Stacking was of little benefit given all the work.

WestCoastCannuck wrote in post #18513193 (external link)
92% humidity..... way too much turbulence for stacking. But I am pretty darn happy with this single exposure. :)

I don't know much about about stacking, so I'm asking this because I might learn something, not out of smart-assery. I very rarely stack, and when I do it's only a couple of images done manually for macro work due to the extremely thin DOF; at the distance we shoot the moon from, it seems to me the DOF is sufficient to get the whole thing in focus, so why stack... is it for noise reduction, or perhaps more of an HDR effect... pulling details out of shadows and highlights?

Thanks.


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17604
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
Post edited over 4 years ago by navydoc.
     
Dec 09, 2017 01:01 |  #4723

LV Moose wrote in post #18513850 (external link)
I don't know much about about stacking, so I'm asking this because I might learn something, not out of smart-assery. I very rarely stack, and when I do it's only a couple of images done manually for macro work due to the extremely thin DOF; at the distance we shoot the moon from, it seems to me the DOF is sufficient to get the whole thing in focus, so why stack... is it for noise reduction, or perhaps more of an HDR effect... pulling details out of shadows and highlights?

Thanks.

I'm sure there are experts out there that can give you a better answer than I can but I think partly, stacking helps overcome atmospheric distortion. This very short video I made recently in 4k shows how the moon shimmers due to heat distortion.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,431 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4766
Joined Dec 2008
Post edited over 4 years ago by LV Moose.
     
Dec 09, 2017 23:09 |  #4724

navydoc wrote in post #18513862 (external link)
I'm sure there are experts out there that can give you a better answer than I can but I think partly, stacking helps overcome atmospheric distortion. This very short video I made recently in 4k shows how the moon shimmers due to heat distortion.

Yeah, I get the heat distortion thing, but how would stacking images help that? For grins, let's say you stack four different images at various opacity, each is "wavy" but in different ways; seem like the final image would be more blurry than any of the single shots; you don't really notice the waves, unless it's shot in a video like the one you posted.

Must be another reason for the stacking.

Orrr...

I could just be stupid. ;-)a


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17604
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Dec 09, 2017 23:29 |  #4725

LV Moose wrote in post #18514456 (external link)
Yeah, I get the heat distortion thing, but how would stacking images help that? For grins, let's say you stack four different images at various opacity, each is "wavy" but in different ways; seem like the final image would be more blurry than any of the single shots; you don't really notice the waves, unless it's shot in a video like the one you posted.

Must be another reason for the stacking.

Orrr...

I could just be stupid. ;-)a

From what I understand, stacking takes the sharpest areas of each exposure and blends them into one image that is sharper overall. Some stacking programs use video frames for stacks which can result in hundreds of frames being analyzed and stacked.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,795,150 views & 13,287 likes for this thread
The Official Shoot the Moon Thread
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is wkl
622 guests, 185 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.