Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 02 Jan 2018 (Tuesday) 08:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

First monolight. Godox. But which one?

 
soeren
Whoops Im not updated
270 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Nov 2017
Post edited 6 months ago by soeren. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 03, 2018 10:20 |  #31

For the new 2.4Ghz system, X1 and X-Pro triggers the USB reciever is XTR16. The FT16 is the older 433MHz system. The two won't work together. The GT400 does hav a wireless control port.
http://www.godox.com …ash_Gemini_GT_S​eries.html (external link)
The GT series will work with the XTR16 USB reciever just like the AD360 And is thus compatible with the X1T and X-Pro system, offcource without ttl etc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,415 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3654
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
Post edited 6 months ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 03, 2018 10:28 as a reply to  @ soeren's post |  #32

That is where the confusion is. It is a USB port, but they keep calling it a wireless control port, which is entirely too vague. It took some searching through videos to see that indeed, that is a USB port with the old XT16 receiver, so yes the XTR16 receiver should also work. Godox needs a single "compatibility" page of all their flashes/strobes and the corresponding wireless protocols/devices that work.

The SK400II has all that nice stuff built in though, which eliminates some headaches.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soeren
Whoops Im not updated
270 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Nov 2017
     
Jan 03, 2018 10:32 |  #33

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18532474 (external link)
That is where the confusion is. It is a USB port, but they keep calling it a wireless control port, which is entirely too vague. It took some searching through videos to see that indeed, that is a USB port with the old XT16 receiver, so yes the XTR16 receiver should also work. Godox needs a single "compatibility" page of all their flashes/strobes and the corresponding wireless protocols/devices that work.

The SK400II has all that nice stuff built in though, which eliminates some headaches.

The nice thing with Godox is the upgrade on the FT16 triggering system, or the receivers to the 2,4GHz X1 system with their XTR16 taking older flash units into the new age.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,415 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3654
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
Post edited 6 months ago by TeamSpeed. (3 edits in all)
     
Jan 03, 2018 10:37 |  #34

soeren wrote in post #18532478 (external link)
The nice thing with Godox is the upgrade on the FT16 triggering system, or the receivers to the 2,4GHz X1 system with their XTR16 taking older flash units into the new age.

Sure, but this is because they changed things so rapidly, they almost had to do this. I would think alot of buyers would have been a bit alienated to have purchased a strobe, and 6 months later, they had to do all these kluges to make the 433Mhz and newer R1/R2 protocol all work with various transmitters all cobbled together. I don't think they had too much a choice here, but am glad they did it too! :)

I had 2 AD360s, when all the new R1/R2 flashes and strobes came out, and I wasn't ready to go any further until I saw that they were willing to retro the old items into the new protocol. That allowed me to get rid of all my Yongnuo devices and Canon flashes, and go with Godox units, something I probably wouldn't have done, had I been stuck with the AD360s and then worried about the future of other Godox purchases becoming obsolete in short order.

A company that works on backward compatibility while bringing new things onto the market will keep my attention!


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
17,722 posts
Gallery: 269 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 5815
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
     
Jan 03, 2018 10:47 |  #35

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18532474 (external link)
That is where the confusion is. It is a USB port, but they keep calling it a wireless control port, which is entirely too vague. It took some searching through videos to see that indeed, that is a USB port with the old XT16 receiver, so yes the XTR16 receiver should also work. Godox needs a single "compatibility" page of all their flashes/strobes and the corresponding wireless protocols/devices that work.

Yes, very much so!

The SK400II has all that nice stuff built in though, which eliminates some headaches.

I know, but from what I read the GT400 is the better strobe. For one thing minimum output power of the GT400 is 1/64 vs 1/16 on the SK400II. That's important to me.

soeren wrote in post #18532471 (external link)
For the new 2.4Ghz system, X1 and X-Pro triggers the USB reciever is XTR16. The FT16 is the older 433MHz system. The two won't work together. The GT400 does hav a wireless control port.
http://www.godox.com …ash_Gemini_GT_S​eries.html (external link)
The GT series will work with the XTR16 USB reciever just like the AD360 And is thus compatible with the X1T and X-Pro system, offcource without ttl etc.

Okay, so the XTR16 receiver on the GT400 will work with the X-Pro. Cool. Thanks.


Levina
Please quote when responding to a post!!!
There is no such thing as ect. It's etc. (with period) from latin et cetera.
Colours are not complimentary but complementary.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inkista
Senior Member
Avatar
569 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Post edited 6 months ago by inkista. (14 edits in all)
     
Jan 03, 2018 14:49 |  #36

soeren wrote in post #18532471 (external link)
For the new 2.4Ghz system, X1 and X-Pro triggers the USB reciever is XTR16. The FT16 is the older 433MHz system. The two won't work together. The GT400 does hav a wireless control port.
http://www.godox.com …ash_Gemini_GT_S​eries.html (external link)
The GT series will work with the XTR16 USB reciever just like the AD360 And is thus compatible with the X1T and X-Pro system, offcource without ttl etc.

IIRC (I don't use monolights, so I'm just soaking up stuff that elv writes over on Flash Havoc and stuff you guys write here), the reason that Godox is currently updating their plug-in monolight series to mk II versions is to a) build in an X/R2 receiver, and b) to switch the monolights to use the same ratio power settings (1/2, 1/4, etc.) that the speedlights do, rather than a percentage control that the older non-Mk II lights do.

I asked elv about the X-system/XTR16 compatibility of the FTR16-capable monolights in the comments threads on the Flash Havoc Godox system overview, and he wrote:

I’m not really sure how many of the older AC strobes which use the USB receiver system are even completely compatible with the XT16 receiver. I think a few people have mentioned quirks generally depending on what power scale the strobes use.

I'd actually say getting a QSII (external link) or GSII series strobe (external link) (both of which do 1/32), might make more sense than getting a GT and adding on an XTR16 receiver. Or possibly waiting to see if the GT series also gets upgraded to a Mk II.

So far, Godox has upgraded the QT, QS, DP, GS, and SK series to Mark IIs (external link). I'm a little curious to see if they do this all the way down to the Mini Pioneers. :)


I'm a woman. I shoot with a Fuji X100T, Panasonic GX-7, Canon 5DmkII, and 50D. flickr stream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elv
Goldmember
1,478 posts
Likes: 172
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jan 03, 2018 20:42 |  #37

Yes, go with the MK II lights when you possibly can.

I don't know why Godox have not added the alternate power scales to the current Xpro transmitter, and we are at the point with the coming Flashpoint version that I can't argue for things like this anymore, as no one wants to delay them any further at this stage.

And numerous times now with various firmware updates, the separate receivers are first to lose full compatibility with various bugs introduced.

It all generally runs very nicely together if you can stick with the built in radio gear.


FLASHHAVOC.COM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
17,722 posts
Gallery: 269 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 5815
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Post edited 6 months ago by Levina de Ruijter.
     
Jan 04, 2018 05:49 as a reply to  @ elv's post |  #38

Oh my, the master Himself! Thank you, elv, point well taken. So it seems I have to start over. Any advice maybe on what to get instead?

Thank you too, inkista.


Levina
Please quote when responding to a post!!!
There is no such thing as ect. It's etc. (with period) from latin et cetera.
Colours are not complimentary but complementary.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,415 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3654
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
Post edited 6 months ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 04, 2018 06:44 |  #39

Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #18533078 (external link)
Oh my, the master Himself! Thank you, elv, point well taken. So it seems I have to start over. Any advice maybe on what to get instead?

Thank you too, inkista.

It sounds like the question is what is a fairly inexpensive manual Godox strobe that has built-in R2, is 400Ws or more, and can provide lower power down to at least 1/32, or more even?

I tried to research this and only came up with SK400II or DP400II, which meet everything but only go to 1/16th. If this is the case, then is there any way you can modify your lights to reduce the output further when needed? Just the placement of the lights alone to twice the distance will reduce the power, or use a combination of aperture, distance and modifiers to get to your 1/64th.

I used this page to go through the options.
http://flashhavoc.com …-overview/comment-page-2/ (external link)

It feels like your options are to either spend 2-3x as much on a newer Godox strobe, or modify how you plan on using the lights by using distance, aperture, and modifiers to save money.

I look forward to what Elv can point you to!


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
17,722 posts
Gallery: 269 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 5815
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
     
Jan 04, 2018 07:49 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #40

Those are the same options I see, Cary. And they're not very good, are they? Maybe I should just go for a really cheap thingy now, like the SK300II and then upgrade to something better, (like a GT400II - surely they will do an update on the GT series too!), later. The SK300II could then serve as a second light. And one X-Pro to rule them all...  :p

The benefit of this route would be that I can learn how to use a monolight and will know much better what I need for what I do. And who knows, maybe the SK300II will be all I need.

Any thoughts?


Levina
Please quote when responding to a post!!!
There is no such thing as ect. It's etc. (with period) from latin et cetera.
Colours are not complimentary but complementary.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,415 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3654
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Jan 04, 2018 11:07 |  #41

That makes sense to me but it would good to hear from others too. A 300Ws strobe still produces light greater than a few flashes, certainly more than two anyways, probably around 3 to 4.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soeren
Whoops Im not updated
270 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Nov 2017
     
Jan 04, 2018 11:57 |  #42

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18533226 (external link)
That makes sense to me but it would good to hear from others too. A 300Ws strobe still produces light greater than a few flashes, certainly more than two anyways, probably around 3 to 4.

I think the AD360 equals 4 of the higher powered speedlights




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
17,722 posts
Gallery: 269 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 5815
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
     
Jan 04, 2018 12:10 |  #43

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18533226 (external link)
That makes sense to me but it would good to hear from others too. A 300Ws strobe still produces light greater than a few flashes, certainly more than two anyways, probably around 3 to 4.

soeren wrote in post #18533267 (external link)
I think the AD360 equals 4 of the higher powered speedlights

Yeah, so I thought this could be a nice compromise.


Levina
Please quote when responding to a post!!!
There is no such thing as ect. It's etc. (with period) from latin et cetera.
Colours are not complimentary but complementary.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soeren
Whoops Im not updated
270 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Nov 2017
Post edited 6 months ago by soeren.
     
Jan 04, 2018 12:22 |  #44

Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #18533281 (external link)
Yeah, so I thought this could be a nice compromise.

Well it may be higher priced than e.g. the QT400II. It was just a comment on the power from 300WS vs speedlights.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
17,722 posts
Gallery: 269 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 5815
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
     
Jan 04, 2018 12:35 |  #45

soeren wrote in post #18533295 (external link)
Well it may be higher priced than e.g. the QT400II. It was just a comment on the power from 300WS vs speedlights.

Yes, I know. I meant, the SK300II could be a nice compromise.


Levina
Please quote when responding to a post!!!
There is no such thing as ect. It's etc. (with period) from latin et cetera.
Colours are not complimentary but complementary.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

13,720 views & 29 likes for this thread
First monolight. Godox. But which one?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is foxier22
499 guests, 379 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.