Fingers crossed
Dec 27, 2017 20:58 | #31 Fingers crossed Still learning English. Sorry for language bugs. My job: alldatarecovery.pl
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 27, 2017 23:02 | #32 God Bless.... Canon R3 | RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | EF 135mm f/2L | EF 50mm f/1,2L | RF 100mm f/2,8L | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2,8-4 Di OSD | ZE 2/100mm | ZF 2/35mm | ZF 1,4/85mm | ZF 2/135mm | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 29, 2017 11:59 | #33 Prayers my friend JohnBphotography.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spamster Senior Member  More info | Dec 29, 2017 23:25 | #34 Lens is looking nice. Makes me want to use 85mm focal length more ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 30, 2017 06:33 | #35 spamster wrote in post #18529207  Lens is looking nice. Makes me want to use 85mm focal length more ... Me too BUT...I have the 85 1.8 and hardly ever use it. Why? I have no idea.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlexTakesPhotos Goldmember  1,125 posts Likes: 128 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Denver CO More info | Jan 04, 2018 20:09 | #36 |
huntersdad Goldmember 4,870 posts Likes: 652 Joined Nov 2008 More info | Jan 04, 2018 21:00 | #37 i-G12 wrote in post #18529294 Me too BUT...I have the 85 1.8 and hardly ever use it. Why? I have no idea. I still want this lens. But, $1,600 ---  I went through this too. Never used my 85 1.8 because I didn't trust it. My 85 now almost never leaves my camera. I am really digging this lens. May be the first time i have ever gotten a lens and been blown away by it.  Image hosted by forum (893603) © huntersdad [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2018 17:33 | #38 Just got my lens in today. Haven't had a change to MFA yet. Here are some very quick shots I did of my dog who did not appreciate being woke up from her nap. I hope to get some better shots this weekend, and put it through its paces. I have to say though, I would never have gotten these shots 1/30 and 1/40 of a second without the IS. These were shot in a dimly lit bedroom with the only light being the window light from camera right. This first shot my dog probably was about 2 - 2.5 feet from the background.  lab-101 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr#1 at about 95% crop  lab-102 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr#2  lab-103 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr#3  lab-104 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShotofGod Member  77 posts Likes: 12 Joined Dec 2013 Location: Naples,Italy More info | Jan 12, 2018 07:55 | #39 I'm really undecided between buying this 1.4 compared to 1.2 II. Canon 1DX II | ??? ??L | | 70-200 2.8L IS III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 12, 2018 08:07 | #40 ShotofGod wrote in post #18539284 I'm really undecided between buying this 1.4 compared to 1.2 II. I'm in crisis !! Apparently you have time to think. The 1.4 seems to be on backorder in most places!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scobols Goldmember  More info | Jan 12, 2018 08:14 | #41 I pulled out the 85 at a HS gymnastics meet yesterday (too close to use the 200 or 135) and was very pleased with the results. Autofocus was fast and spot-on. Note: These are cropped.   Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
speed817 Hatchling  5 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: DFW More info | Jan 12, 2018 08:25 | #42 beautiful shots....now i really want this... 6D | 35mm f/1.4 | 135mm f/2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 12, 2018 09:42 | #43 ShotofGod wrote in post #18539284 I'm really undecided between buying this 1.4 compared to 1.2 II. I'm in crisis !! As someone who has both, my recommendation would be to get the 1.4. Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2018 01:26 | #44 Had a chance to use this lens today while we were out celebrating my granddaughter's birthday. Don't judge the quality of the shots too much, because the lighting here was awful. All different kinds of neon lights continually changing brightness. Here are a couple of candid shots I was able to get, and the focus was spot on.  Vanna_Bday-202 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr Vanna_Bday-201 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShotofGod Member 77 posts Likes: 12 Joined Dec 2013 Location: Naples,Italy More info | Jan 14, 2018 06:50 | #45 jwcdds wrote in post #18539327 As someone who has both, my recommendation would be to get the 1.4. Only advantage of the 1.2 is that you can shoot at 1.2. For everything else, the 1.4 is just as good if not notably better. Yes, my doubt stems from this. Canon 1DX II | ??? ??L | | 70-200 2.8L IS III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1374 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
