Newest edition to the family 
Taken with my new 622C II triggers which are also new to the family
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS by Daniel Lee
Jan 11, 2018 01:51 | #436 Newest edition to the family Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS by Daniel LeeSony Alpha A7 Mark IV - Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G - Sony FE 35mm f/1.4 GM - Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DN Art - Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro - Sigma 50mm f/2 DG DN
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2018 01:04 | #437 First real outing with the 6DII. My whole family went to a place called Main Event, and the lighting was terrible. Everything was dimly lit and lots of different colored neon lights everywhere. Plus it seemed like every single spot in this building had a different level of lighting. I finally put my camera in Aperture priority and let the camera try to adjust. I still had to adjust exposure on several images in post, so I got a real world test of the dynamic range.  Vanna_Bday-102 by Tim Richardson, on FlickrISO 6400  Vanna_Bday-105 by Tim Richardson, on FlickrISO 6400  Vanna_Bday-108 by Tim Richardson, on FlickrISO 1600 with flash, but with so many different lights flashing it threw the metering off so I had to adjust exposure +1.35 and shadows +72. (This seems to me like a good example of how much I would need to push the dynamic range, and I am happy with the results)  Vanna_Bday-116 by Tim Richardson, on FlickrISO 1600 with flash (This was after we got back home in normal indoor lighting)  Vanna_Bday-121 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2018 08:01 | #438 Autofocus is a big step up.  Image hosted by forum (895071) © uther1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (895072) © uther1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 6D Mark II,Sigma 50mm A, Sigma 35mm A, , canon 85mm 1.8, canon 50mm 1.8, canon 70-200mm F4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop  More info Post edited over 5 years ago by RPCrowe. (2 edits in all) | Jan 14, 2018 22:27 | #439 Here is an image from my 6Dii using the 70-200mm f/4L IS lens. ISO 320, f/4 at 1/60 second  Image hosted by forum (895228) © RPCrowe [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2018 07:20 | #440 RPCrowe wrote in post #18541054 Here is an image from my 6Dii using the 70-200mm f/4L IS lens. ISO 320, f/4 at 1/60 second 
 Hosted photo: posted by RPCrowe in ./showthread.php?p=18541054&i=i113073436 forum: Canon Digital Cameras Nice! I can never get my dogs to stay in one position. As soon as I get the camera, they come and stick their nose in it!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
There is one word for that, “Stay”: and a little bit of training. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2018 20:59 | #442 A couple of basketball examples  6DIISample-102 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr 6DIISample-101 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2018 12:39 | #443 Malamute  Image hosted by forum (896147) © uther1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 6D Mark II,Sigma 50mm A, Sigma 35mm A, , canon 85mm 1.8, canon 50mm 1.8, canon 70-200mm F4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2018 12:57 | #444 My granddaughter , Loving the AF on the Mark II  Image hosted by forum (896152) © uther1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 6D Mark II,Sigma 50mm A, Sigma 35mm A, , canon 85mm 1.8, canon 50mm 1.8, canon 70-200mm F4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 21, 2018 19:02 | #445 Athena  Image hosted by forum (896222) © uther1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 6D Mark II,Sigma 50mm A, Sigma 35mm A, , canon 85mm 1.8, canon 50mm 1.8, canon 70-200mm F4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 5 years ago by RPCrowe. | Jan 22, 2018 10:12 | #446 I shot this past Saturday with my 7D2 wearing a 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens along with my new 6D2 wearing my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens and was quite disappointed in the performance of the 6D2. The 7D2 climbed all over the 6D2 in general image quality. I have to test both cameras with the same lens under controlled conditions in order to do an accurate test of the 6D2. See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 22, 2018 10:32 | #447 RPCrowe wrote in post #18546449 I shot this past Saturday with my 7D2 wearing a 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens along with my new 6D2 wearing my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens and was quite disappointed in the performance of the 6D2. The 7D2 climbed all over the 6D2 in general image quality. I have to test both cameras with the same lens under controlled conditions in order to do an accurate test of the 6D2. In the past I have paired the 7D2 with the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens and used the 70-200mm f/4L IS lens on a 5D2. There was virtually no difference in general image quality between the images from the 7D2 and the 5D2. The general image quality of the imagery from the 5D2 was, in fact, superior to the imagery from the 6D2. I shot at ISO 320 on both cameras and I had to do a LOT more PP on the 6D2 images than on the 7D2 images. I am so disappointed that I am thinking of biting the bullet and getting rid of the 6D2 and reverting to either my older 5D2 or 7D cameras. Or perhaps dumping all three and buying a 5D4... Would you mind posting some examples?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2018 03:10 | #448 |
JohnSheehy Goldmember 4,542 posts Likes: 1215 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Jan 23, 2018 06:32 | #449 RPCrowe wrote in post #18546449 I shot this past Saturday with my 7D2 wearing a 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens along with my new 6D2 wearing my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens and was quite disappointed in the performance of the 6D2. The 7D2 climbed all over the 6D2 in general image quality. I have to test both cameras with the same lens under controlled conditions in order to do an accurate test of the 6D2. In the past I have paired the 7D2 with the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens and used the 70-200mm f/4L IS lens on a 5D2. There was virtually no difference in general image quality between the images from the 7D2 and the 5D2. The general image quality of the imagery from the 5D2 was, in fact, superior to the imagery from the 6D2. I shot at ISO 320 on both cameras and I had to do a LOT more PP on the 6D2 images than on the 7D2 images. I am so disappointed that I am thinking of biting the bullet and getting rid of the 6D2 and reverting to either my older 5D2 or 7D cameras. Or perhaps dumping all three and buying a 5D4... Doesn't make any sense. Either you have special defective 6D2, or you are being influenced by some non-equitable condition, like undeserved fond memories of the 5D2, or 100% pixel views, with different expectations for FF and the 7D2, or you have been shooting the 6D2 in horrible light conditions.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saea501 ... spilled over a little on the panties  More info | Jan 23, 2018 09:03 | #450 John Sheehy wrote in post #18547113 People are much too fast to jump to conclusions based on non-scientific comparisons and subjective impressions. Noooo.........that never happens. Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1370 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
