Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 20 Oct 2011 (Thursday) 11:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Milkyway nightscapes

 
moose135
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Gallery: 218 photos
Likes: 1164
Joined May 2006
Location: Long Island, NY, Charlotte, NC, and points betweeen...
     
Jan 09, 2018 20:39 |  #3946

irishguy0224 wrote in post #18536986 (external link)
So i presume that is manual focus like most of their others. How are you finding it is to dial that in for nightscapes and what not without auto focus and setting it to infinity?

I use the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, also manual focus. I dial in focus on a distant object in the daylight, then use some electrical tape on the lens to hold the focus ring in place.


The Moose is Loose!
Moose135 Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 09, 2018 23:52 |  #3947

moose135 wrote in post #18537519 (external link)
I use the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, also manual focus. I dial in focus on a distant object in the daylight, then use some electrical tape on the lens to hold the focus ring in place.

That’s never worked for me. I always bump it where the electrical tape didn’t hold. I usually just live view the moon or some brighter star in 5x mode and then switch to MF and recheck every so often.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eddie
xpfloyd lookalike
Avatar
14,819 posts
Gallery: 717 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10916
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Jan 10, 2018 14:08 |  #3948

I zoom in with live view to a bright star and set focus manually then try not to touch the focus ring from that point on


Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
Voigtlander 28 f/2 Ulton II | Leica 50 Summilux ASPH
16-35GM | 24GM | 35GM | 85GM | Tamron 35-150 | Sigma 105 Macro Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
irishguy0224
Senior Member
Avatar
531 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 259
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Rochester, NY
     
Jan 11, 2018 10:35 |  #3949

all great recommendations. thanks a ton everyone!



FlickR (external link)
Sony A7ii - Sony FE 85 1.8 - Zeiss 16-35 F4 - Samyang 35 AF 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rezcar
Goldmember
1,314 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 652
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
     
Jan 12, 2018 15:53 |  #3950

TRhoads wrote in post #18537052 (external link)
most, if not all lenses don't work in AF for shooting dark sky images, and many in my experience require some fiddling and experimenting to get proper focus, most do not get critical focus at infinity. I have rented two different Sigma 20Art lenses, and both of them were a bit different for what was critical. My Batis 18 is pretty easy with the OLED, you can see it at night and after using the SharpStar to help, I know what point is perfect focus for stars.

Sounds like you are looking the Sharp Star. I heard they are more for longer lenses rather than wider ones. It is basically a bhatinov mask commonly used on telescopes, which are longer focal length. Is it worth getting?


Fotostream
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/59148177@N06/ (external link)
#re240zcar
.
"Image quality is not the product of a machine, but of the person who directs the machine, and there are no limits to imagination and expression." - Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,867 posts
Gallery: 740 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 20648
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Roswell, Georgia
     
Jan 12, 2018 19:09 |  #3951

rezcar wrote in post #18539592 (external link)
Sounds like you are looking the Sharp Star. I heard they are more for longer lenses rather than wider ones. It is basically a bhatinov mask commonly used on telescopes, which are longer focal length. Is it worth getting?

I do have the SharpStar and find it works great for wide angle too...


Website (external link) | YouTube (external link) | Instagram (external link) | The Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rezcar
Goldmember
1,314 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 652
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
     
Jan 12, 2018 20:11 |  #3952

TRhoads wrote in post #18539706 (external link)
I do have the SharpStar and find it works great for wide angle too...

Thanks, I'll have to look into again.


Fotostream
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/59148177@N06/ (external link)
#re240zcar
.
"Image quality is not the product of a machine, but of the person who directs the machine, and there are no limits to imagination and expression." - Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Avatar
34,149 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9263
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central California
Post edited over 5 years ago by Maureen Souza.
     
Jan 29, 2018 03:03 |  #3953

I haven't posted in here for a bit but went out in the country for some night shooting recently......

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/01/5/LQ_897374.jpg
Image hosted by forum (897374) © Maureen Souza [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
7DMK2
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 135/2.0, 100-400mm II, 24-70/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jamesgang1950
Member
Avatar
48 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2017
     
Jan 31, 2018 13:41 as a reply to  @ Maureen Souza's post |  #3954

Really nice shot......if I may be a bit nosey? was this stacked or just PP? You use the 24-70 ? I try to shoot MW as I travel as I home in a urban area....... again, very nice work! ( your composition makes it to me!)


El Kabong!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shaun ­ Liddy
Senior Member
280 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 471
Joined Feb 2016
     
Jan 31, 2018 14:01 as a reply to  @ Maureen Souza's post |  #3955

I like the composition for sure. I also wonder about how many images were used etc.

On another note, your profile mentions you are from Central CA, where about?

I live in Salinas and always looking to get out with some local people to shoot. Couple friends and I get out occasionally and I am trying to plan a night shot in late Sep. Perhaps you might want to join?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Avatar
34,149 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9263
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central California
     
Jan 31, 2018 21:47 as a reply to  @ Shaun Liddy's post |  #3956

This was actually taken just east of Pinnacles National Park...then I drove home throughSalinas. I live in Visalia but I am always out & about in Central Cali. We could for sure plan a meet up. Just PM me.


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
7DMK2
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 135/2.0, 100-400mm II, 24-70/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Avatar
34,149 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9263
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central California
     
Jan 31, 2018 21:49 as a reply to  @ jamesgang1950's post |  #3957

This was two shots.....the foreground I took a little earlier in the evening while the moonlight was available. The sky was later at night & I had to darken it a bit to bring out the MW. Rarely do I do a composite so this was fun for me.


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
7DMK2
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 135/2.0, 100-400mm II, 24-70/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gaabnz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,250 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 5256
Joined Jul 2013
     
Feb 26, 2018 15:14 |  #3958

Smooth Reflection milky way blend. Sony A7mkii, Zeiss Batis 18mm. Foreground 16 shot SR app, milky way, single shot.

I went out on Saturday night to shoot the milky way and wanted to try the smooth reflection app for the foreground and blend a single sky shot in. Went to bed early and the sky was crystal clear and unreal. Milky Way core was rising at around 2am so got up and went to the beach for this shot. Unfortunately the cloud had started to come in (was supposed to be crystal clear all night) I managed to get one shot with a little bit of the milky way showing and then shot my SR foreground to blend in.
I stuck it out for an hour and then I couldn't see a single star for the cloud so went home. I will definately try this again for a clean foreground shot.

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4666/40461855072_d3be99d9c5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/24Dt​zQU  (external link) Te Arai smooth reflection blend (external link) by Gary Ashton (external link), on Flickr

Sony A7mkiii / Zeiss Batis 18mm f2.8 / Zeiss FE35 f2.8 / EF24-105F4L / EF70-200f4L / EF50mm f1.8 / Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rezcar
Goldmember
1,314 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 652
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
     
Feb 26, 2018 16:59 |  #3959

gaabnz wrote in post #18572875 (external link)
Smooth Reflection milky way blend. Sony A7mkii, Zeiss Batis 18mm. Foreground 16 shot SR app, milky way, single shot.

I went out on Saturday night to shoot the milky way and wanted to try the smooth reflection app for the foreground and blend a single sky shot in. Went to bed early and the sky was crystal clear and unreal. Milky Way core was rising at around 2am so got up and went to the beach for this shot. Unfortunately the cloud had started to come in (was supposed to be crystal clear all night) I managed to get one shot with a little bit of the milky way showing and then shot my SR foreground to blend in.
I stuck it out for an hour and then I couldn't see a single star for the cloud so went home. I will definately try this again for a clean foreground shot.

Nice shot, so do you use the app for noise reduction or for long exposure simulation? I think you mentioned the beach so I'm assuming the latter. Does the app do nose reduction similar to median stacking in PS?

You said you got 16 shots but also say you will try again for a clean foreground? I'm just trying to see if I should use the app, I already have it, but do stacking in PS. Thanks


Fotostream
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/59148177@N06/ (external link)
#re240zcar
.
"Image quality is not the product of a machine, but of the person who directs the machine, and there are no limits to imagination and expression." - Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gaabnz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,250 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 5256
Joined Jul 2013
     
Feb 26, 2018 17:01 |  #3960

rezcar wrote in post #18572965 (external link)
Nice shot, so do you use the app for noise reduction or for long exposure simulation? I think you mentioned the beach so I'm assuming the latter. Does the app do nose reduction similar to median stacking in PS?

You said you got 16 shots but also say you will try again for a clean foreground? I'm just trying to see if I should use the app, I already have it, but do stacking in PS. Thanks

Hey

I was aiming for noise reduction and being able to bring a lot more detail out in the foreground. The single shot of the milky way I took, the foreground is just black. I've never done the stacking in PS, but really like the SR method. I need to trial and error a little more and keep trying.

I do use the SR app for long exposure simulation instead of my filters too.


Sony A7mkiii / Zeiss Batis 18mm f2.8 / Zeiss FE35 f2.8 / EF24-105F4L / EF70-200f4L / EF50mm f1.8 / Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,130,145 views & 10,101 likes for this thread, 697 members have posted to it and it is followed by 326 members.
Milkyway nightscapes
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1559 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.