Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Classifieds: Want to Buy 
Thread started 27 Jan 2018 (Saturday) 11:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Seeking: Lens with 400mm Reach

 
Summary of marketplace feedback given to Bogino
First feedback: never, latest feedback: never.
Bogino has not given any feedback to others.
Overall Ratingn/a
not rated
Communicationn/a
not rated
Deliveryn/a
not rated
Paymentn/a
not rated
ForumAllSellBuy
Classifieds: Want to Buy0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Classifieds: For Sale0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Classifieds: Services Offered0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Classifieds: Services Needed0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Sell: Bogino was selling. Buy: Bogino was buying. Overall rating average of each role/forum shown in parenthesis.

This new marketplace feedback system started in early 2018. Older feedback for this member may be available in the legacy feedback thread, click here to autosearch them. To search for all threads by Bogino in marketplace forums, click here.
BOUGHT / CLOSED before you can give marketplace feedback.

Bogino
Senior Member
Avatar
457 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 112
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 27, 2018 11:53 |  #1

Seeking a lens with 400mm reach to use with my Canon 7D Mark II. I am open and flexible to brand, Canon..Sigma..Tamron..​etc. Also open to it being fixed focal or zoom. Intended for wildlife photography. NOT for "bird in flight" type photography. I photograph mostly slower moving animals or animals that are still and mostly in a rain forest setting.

My criteria is that the lens be in excellent cosmetic and functioning condition as well as I DO NOT generally like to buy lenses that are more than 5 or 6 years old.

Thank You.


Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,779 posts
Gallery: 1168 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8340
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited 6 months ago by MalVeauX.
     
Jan 27, 2018 12:32 |  #2

Budget?

Otherwise, the obvious will be Canon 100-400 MK II.

Based on your criteria, a used 100-400 MK I is not going to be young enough.

And if you need a budget option, the Tamron 100-400 VC is a new contender for half the cost of the new Canon MKII.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
457 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 112
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 27, 2018 13:52 as a reply to  @ MalVeauX's post |  #3

I'm flexible on budget. I would be open to the 100-400 Ver. II but it would have to be priced aggressively. Meaning better than the roughly $1700 most sellers are trying to sell these for. I'm in no rush and have the luxury of time as my next scheduled trip is not until October. But if I find a "too good to pass up" deal today I'm ready to move. I will read up on the Tamron you referenced as well. Thank You.


Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,346 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2074
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited 6 months ago by Wilt. (4 edits in all)
     
Jan 27, 2018 14:34 |  #4

If you are asking for '400mm reach' and use the 7DII, are you not simply looking for something 'at least of 250mm FL' ...a 7.2 degree diagonal AOV?!
If so, getting a 70-200mm and a 1.4x teleconvertor is a reasonable consideration...the excellent Canon 70-200 f/4 with 1.4x teleconvertor has been tested and shown to suffer only 10% loss in MTF, and that gives you a 280mm f/5.6 lens..about the same effective aperture and same MTF as the 100-400mm at 300mm


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
457 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 112
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 27, 2018 14:58 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #5

I recently acquired the 70-200mm 2.8 IS ver. II. Which so far I love by the way. Are you suggesting that by adding an extender to that I don't really need to focus on adding a 400mm reach lens? Thx.


Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,249 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 3356
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland OR USA
     
Jan 27, 2018 15:02 |  #6

Get a 300 f4. Not that expensive, and you'll need all the speed you can get in the rainforest.


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,346 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2074
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited 6 months ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Jan 27, 2018 15:24 |  #7

Bogino wrote in post #18550289 (external link)
I recently acquired the 70-200mm 2.8 IS ver. II. Which so far I love by the way. Are you suggesting that by adding an extender to that I don't really need to focus on adding a 400mm reach lens? Thx.

Exactly! a far less expensive way to get to the same end result. So you end up with 280mm f/4...equiv. to 448mm on FF for reach.
All the Canon 70-200 versions are extremely well complemented with a 1.4X teleconvertor, with only about 10% loss in MTF scores, per photozone.de testing (which unfortunately they stopped doing in recent years)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgoetz4
Senior Member
Avatar
292 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Hanover, Pa-Baltimore, Md
Post edited 6 months ago by jgoetz4. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 27, 2018 18:19 |  #8

I'm selling my original Bigma (50-500mm) with a Kenko Pro 1.4x TC for $495/shipped. This shot was taken on my old 70D. Thanks for looking :-)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


6D, 10-22 (modified for the 6D) 7Artisans 25 1.8, Meike 35 1.7, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC
Fuji X-E1 x2 and a bunch of FD glass
Fuji X100
Sky-Watcher 8'' Dobsonian

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
457 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 112
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 27, 2018 19:21 as a reply to  @ Scrumhalf's post |  #9

Are you referring to the 70-300mm L lens? If so I already have that one.


Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tinshield2016
Member
84 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 93
Joined May 2016
     
Jan 29, 2018 12:32 as a reply to  @ Bogino's post |  #10

I have a 100-400, I am the original owner in excellent condition smoke free home and used very little reason for selling I am moving over to Sony. I will take $1,600.00 net to me and I will pay shipping.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
12,154 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2923
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
     
Jan 29, 2018 12:49 |  #11

Bogino wrote in post #18550289 (external link)
Are you suggesting that by adding an extender to that I don't really need to focus on adding a 400mm reach lens? Thx.

As one who has a lot of experience shooting wildlife, I think this is a poor idea.

There is no need to "cheapskate your way into" more reach when you have an ample budget and there are so many GREAT lens choices that get you to a true 400mm focal length.

It's not about math or angle of view or crop factors. . It is about optical quality, autofocus ability, and the overall aesthetics of the images you take.


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
457 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 112
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Feb 02, 2018 18:49 |  #12

After considerable research and reading lots of feedback I am updating by Target Buy. I am specifically going to seek the following:


  • Canon 100-400mm version 1.
  • Date Code 2010 or later.
  • Price: $700.00 (depending upon condition and accesories).


If that's you please let me know.

Thank You.

Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
REPLYING DENIED:
BOUGHT / CLOSED
621 views & 2 likes for this thread
Seeking: Lens with 400mm Reach
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Classifieds: Want to Buy 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is allen456
827 guests, 371 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.