Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 Sep 2016 (Wednesday) 13:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

-= 5D Mark IV owners unite! Post photos and discuss.

 
srika
Goldmember
Avatar
3,900 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 232
Joined Aug 2004
Location: chicago
     
Feb 05, 2018 16:18 |  #4441

some snaps from St. Patrick's in NYC recently, had a wonderful time with the Sigma 12-24, playing with a variety of editing styles

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4611/40073042212_84c95685c5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2447​PjU  (external link) NC8A0103m3sw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4657/28324905849_cd858fe45f_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/K9Yx​FF  (external link) NC8A9937sw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4651/39393701924_feea2f60b3_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2326​28j  (external link) NC8A0054bwsw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4659/40105874361_d947ef130f_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2472​6br  (external link) NC8A9899msw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4682/38271256375_a37c346688_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/21iU​caR  (external link) NC8A9882m2sw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr

raѕιdel ѕlιĸa f l i c k r (external link) . p σ r t f σ l í σ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
shaunmcfd
Senior Member
Avatar
814 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 521
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 16:28 as a reply to  @ srika's post |  #4442

These would give auto vertical in LR a heart attack.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Canon 24-70 ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cham_001
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Likes: 58
Joined Feb 2009
Location: based between Ruse, Bulgaria & Recife-Brazil
     
Feb 05, 2018 16:31 |  #4443

srika wrote in post #18557101 (external link)
some snaps from St. Patrick's in NYC recently, had a wonderful time with the Sigma 12-24, playing with a variety of editing styles

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2447​PjU  (external link) NC8A0103m3sw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr


QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/K9Yx​FF  (external link) NC8A9937sw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr


QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2326​28j  (external link) NC8A0054bwsw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr


QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2472​6br  (external link) NC8A9899msw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr


https://flic.kr/p/21iU​caR (external link)NC8A9882m2sw (external link) by Ross Images (external link), on Flickr

---
bw!


"... with a clear perspective - the confusion is clearer ..."
Body: Canon 5D-IV
Lenses: 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
Flashguns: 580ex II x 4, MT24 macro flash
Accessories: Pkt Wiz TT5 x 4, AC3, MiniTT1, Sekonic L-758DR
Studio Lights: <... pending ...>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
srika
Goldmember
Avatar
3,900 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 232
Joined Aug 2004
Location: chicago
     
Feb 05, 2018 17:01 as a reply to  @ post 18556577 |  #4444

thanks for taking a look and thanks for the words!

hmmm the bridge I am not sure I remember that - I know we walked in towards the glacier for what seemed about 1 mile.

hope that gives you an idea but I do not remember a bridge being there - this is Jökulsárlón - maybe there is one on another side?


raѕιdel ѕlιĸa f l i c k r (external link) . p σ r t f σ l í σ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djr81
Member
105 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 146
Joined Nov 2013
     
Feb 05, 2018 17:41 |  #4445

srika wrote in post #18557126 (external link)
thanks for taking a look and thanks for the words!

hmmm the bridge I am not sure I remember that - I know we walked in towards the glacier for what seemed about 1 mile.

hope that gives you an idea but I do not remember a bridge being there - this is Jökulsárlón - maybe there is one on another side?

Sorry for not being clear. I meant the bridge between the lake and the ocean - you would have driven over it if you went around the northern side of the lake. But a mile sounds about right in any case. Thanks.

https://www.google.com​.au …d64.0784458!4d-16.2305537 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I Chimp, therefore I am
Avatar
5,870 posts
Gallery: 118 photos
Likes: 3926
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 1 year ago by Choderboy. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 06, 2018 02:19 |  #4446

Some inconsiderate person has put a piling rig or similar in my sunset. Yeah, bit of cloning tool work required.

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4741/40112476551_effbd97851_o.jpg

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4651/40112477041_77b0d20e32_o.jpg

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4740/40112477021_e64250f259_o.jpg

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,416 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 3895
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland OR USA
Post edited over 1 year ago by Scrumhalf.
     
Feb 06, 2018 10:54 |  #4447

bwhip wrote in post #18556517 (external link)
Took a little drive on Saturday...

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

Nice! I would be happy with those shots, especially 1 and 2, in a BMW sales brochure!


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trout ­ Bum
Senior Member
503 posts
Gallery: 110 photos
Likes: 530
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Idaho, USA
     
Feb 06, 2018 16:01 |  #4448

Last week had a flock of Cedar Waxwings in the yard:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mark
My photography website (external link)
My fine art website (external link)
My youtube channel (external link)
Instagram: @MarkMilleArt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trout ­ Bum
Senior Member
503 posts
Gallery: 110 photos
Likes: 530
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Idaho, USA
Post edited over 1 year ago by Trout Bum. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 06, 2018 16:02 |  #4449

Today a flock of Bohemians:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mark
My photography website (external link)
My fine art website (external link)
My youtube channel (external link)
Instagram: @MarkMilleArt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckmiller
Goldmember
Avatar
1,191 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 663
Joined May 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida and Daytona Beach, Florida USA
     
Feb 06, 2018 22:01 |  #4450

PERFECT placement of the car.

bwhip wrote in post #18556517 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE


.
.
.
Retired from Fire/Rescue with 30 years on the job 1/05/2019

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
1,656 posts
Gallery: 528 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11350
Joined Feb 2014
     
Feb 06, 2018 22:33 |  #4451

bwhip wrote in post #18556517 (external link)
Took a little drive on Saturday...

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

Did you get nailed on the front plate? My friends M4 has a plate location kit to the side... Great shots, and that looks like a blast! Don't see any pumice/sand, so no rock chips and hopefully no slow drivers in your way!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
1,656 posts
Gallery: 528 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11350
Joined Feb 2014
     
Feb 06, 2018 22:44 |  #4452

Ugh... Used the center 9 points F8 ISO800 1/3200 + 1.4xIII...

Starting to lose faith in the Canon setup. Middle of the day, perfect light, he slowly glided off the tree and dropped, was able to get this shot and then once there was more tree in the backround, it OFCOURSE picks out the trees to focus on, then once he slowed even more to eye some prey, then it locked back on but was still blurry.

I think the best bird images have amazing backrounds, not just a sharp bird with a blue sky. This scenario has occurred so many times it's extremely frustrating. Is it based on the whole contrast thing taking precedent over the moving object? It does wonderful for perched birds, but once you have trees, it seems to jump to those.

I have it set on case 2 "Continue to track subjects, ignoring possible obstacles" Tracking Sensitivity +2, Accel./Dece. tracking -2, AF pt auto switching 0.

Open to suggestions, but I'd rather have less megapixels and a sharp image over 30-50 megapixels of blur, let along the wasted time on countless trips thinking that "well, maybe NEXT time, I'll get that shot...." Starting to think I should actually rent a Nikon setup with the new 100-500 lens and simply compare for FLIGHT shots with confusing backrounds. Again, backround = makes the shot, unless the bird has prey or it's doing something unique, otherwise, it's just another sharp bird photo, of which most of us move to more noble pursuits/wish to grow/avoid atrophy.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,071 posts
Gallery: 744 photos
Likes: 12914
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Maryland
Post edited over 1 year ago by MatthewK. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 07, 2018 04:53 |  #4453

markesc wrote in post #18558218 (external link)
Ugh... Used the center 9 points F8 ISO800 1/3200 + 1.4xIII...

Starting to lose faith in the Canon setup. Middle of the day, perfect light, he slowly glided off the tree and dropped, was able to get this shot and then once there was more tree in the backround, it OFCOURSE picks out the trees to focus on, then once he slowed even more to eye some prey, then it locked back on but was still blurry.

I think the best bird images have amazing backrounds, not just a sharp bird with a blue sky. This scenario has occurred so many times it's extremely frustrating. Is it based on the whole contrast thing taking precedent over the moving object? It does wonderful for perched birds, but once you have trees, it seems to jump to those.

I have it set on case 2 "Continue to track subjects, ignoring possible obstacles" Tracking Sensitivity +2, Accel./Dece. tracking -2, AF pt auto switching 0.

Open to suggestions, but I'd rather have less megapixels and a sharp image over 30-50 megapixels of blur, let along the wasted time on countless trips thinking that "well, maybe NEXT time, I'll get that shot...." Starting to think I should actually rent a Nikon setup with the new 100-500 lens and simply compare for FLIGHT shots with confusing backrounds. Again, backround = makes the shot, unless the bird has prey or it's doing something unique, otherwise, it's just another sharp bird photo, of which most of us move to more noble pursuits/wish to grow/avoid atrophy.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by markesc in
./showthread.php?p=185​58218&i=i80663002
forum: Canon EOS Digital Cameras

Holy crap, this is an awesome capture, Chris. NAILED this shot. I don't think I could have gotten anything like this, dude.

Over on FM, everyone is switching to Nikon suddenly because of this, as did Art Morris. Apparently current Nikon AF in the D500/D850/D5 would have locked onto and tracked your hawk no problem. Not that Canon AF can't do it, but it users report that Nikon AF makes it effortless. It may be worth checking out the D500/200-500 as a second system.

Here's the thing: it's not an all-or-nothing decision. Nikon happens to do this one thing better, Canon has their list of things they do better. Both systems rock, there's nothing saying we can't mix and match. The D850 makes things difficult though, that is one awesome camera that I wouldn't hesitate to switch for. Yet, I won't, because I took a Pepcid last year and my GAS has been at a low, manageable level for some time. :-)


.:: GAS-Free 'til July 2020 ::. for real this time, I swear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nqjudo
Goldmember
Avatar
3,208 posts
Likes: 1041
Joined Apr 2007
Post edited over 1 year ago by nqjudo.
     
Feb 07, 2018 04:54 |  #4454

markesc wrote in post #18558218 (external link)
Ugh... Used the center 9 points F8 ISO800 1/3200 + 1.4xIII...

Starting to lose faith in the Canon setup. Middle of the day, perfect light, he slowly glided off the tree and dropped, was able to get this shot and then once there was more tree in the backround, it OFCOURSE picks out the trees to focus on, then once he slowed even more to eye some prey, then it locked back on but was still blurry.

I think the best bird images have amazing backrounds, not just a sharp bird with a blue sky. This scenario has occurred so many times it's extremely frustrating. Is it based on the whole contrast thing taking precedent over the moving object? It does wonderful for perched birds, but once you have trees, it seems to jump to those.

I have it set on case 2 "Continue to track subjects, ignoring possible obstacles" Tracking Sensitivity +2, Accel./Dece. tracking -2, AF pt auto switching 0.

Open to suggestions, but I'd rather have less megapixels and a sharp image over 30-50 megapixels of blur, let along the wasted time on countless trips thinking that "well, maybe NEXT time, I'll get that shot...." Starting to think I should actually rent a Nikon setup with the new 100-500 lens and simply compare for FLIGHT shots with confusing backrounds. Again, backround = makes the shot, unless the bird has prey or it's doing something unique, otherwise, it's just another sharp bird photo, of which most of us move to more noble pursuits/wish to grow/avoid atrophy.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by markesc in
./showthread.php?p=185​58218&i=i80663002
forum: Canon EOS Digital Cameras

There are enough BIF shots around from this camera (several in this thread) to demonstrate that tracking a moving bird is a fairly easy task for the camera and this shot represents nothing challenging for the camera's AF. It is all down to the user and configuration. Personally I avoid using 9 point selection when there are strong background elements that the camera might lock onto. On a bird perched or moving from a strong, contrasty background it is asking for trouble. With that subject the expand AF (5 points) would be my choice or possibly single point. You've got a large subject headed straight for you that looks easy enough to keep framed in the centre. I use one of these two selections almost exclusively with an alternate, larger AF selection programmed to another button should I need it. Sometimes with a perched bird I start with a single point and then switch to an expanded selection when the bird moves closer or away from potentially confusing background elements. Larger AF areas only come into play when I determine there is less likelihood that backgrounds will interfere with operation. Your case setting look good I'd only add that for birding using AI Servo I have the 1st shot priory set to focus priority but this doesn't sound like an issue in your case. You mention the use of a TC. Which glass are you using in front of it? I find that TCs are great accessories but they rarely make life easier when trying to capture BIF.


No photographer is as good as the simplest camera. - Edward Steichen.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,071 posts
Gallery: 744 photos
Likes: 12914
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Maryland
     
Feb 07, 2018 04:58 as a reply to  @ nqjudo's post |  #4455

I like your setup (Single Point on one button, Large AF on another). Will give this a try for myself; currently I just have single AF point for both back buttons, but one is Servo, the other Single-Shot.


.:: GAS-Free 'til July 2020 ::. for real this time, I swear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,142,313 views & 31,043 likes for this thread
-= 5D Mark IV owners unite! Post photos and discuss.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is gammy13
2018 guests, 213 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.