Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Olympus Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Dec 2014 (Saturday) 11:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

The OMD photo thread

 
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
14,841 posts
Gallery: 1408 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 38348
Joined Jul 2013
     
Feb 08, 2018 05:50 |  #541

bidkev wrote in post #18559128 (external link)
.
.
Also from today. The 40-150 is ok for the price but I need more reach. Big crops

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/KdCL​A4  (external link) Test shots Olympus Zuicko 40-150 (2) (external link) by Kevin Dickinson (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/235H​tFj  (external link) Test shots Olympus Zuicko 40-150 (1) (external link) by Kevin Dickinson (external link), on Flickr

Kev those are just fascinating creatures and you're imaging them in the day light, how cool is that.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
bidkev
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 1989 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 9725
Joined Jul 2013
Location: From Blackpool UK to Brisbane Australia 20 yrs ago
     
Feb 08, 2018 08:17 |  #542

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18559166 (external link)
Kev those are just fascinating creatures and you're imaging them in the day light, how cool is that.


They normally have their wings wrapped around their head, sleeping. But the sun had just burst through after a heavy shower so whether that woke them, I don't know? I often get there early when they are coming in to roost, but I wanted to test the lens reachwise but it's lacking.............if I sell any more analog gear on ebay I may go for the 75-300. Anyways, this was around 10 am so I got lucky


See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/ (external link)
Olympus E-M5 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus Zuicko 12-40 2.8 pro | 40-150 | 75-300 |45mm 1.8 | 17mm 1.8 | 60mm 2.8 macro |Panasonic 12-32

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,036 posts
Gallery: 1557 photos
Likes: 5541
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 08, 2018 11:14 |  #543

bidkev wrote in post #18559225 (external link)
They normally have their wings wrapped around their head, sleeping. But the sun had just burst through after a heavy shower so whether that woke them, I don't know? I often get there early when they are coming in to roost, but I wanted to test the lens reachwise but it's lacking.............if I sell any more analog gear on ebay I may go for the 75-300. Anyways, this was around 10 am so I got lucky


I have the 75-300 mk 2 although I havn't had it long, what I will say is its very good, and to be honest I think its better than similar 70-300 lenses (Nikon. Canon, Sigma, etc) Ok its not a Pro pro lens but its also not over 1000 to but I got mine nearly new mint condition for 265.

P.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,036 posts
Gallery: 1557 photos
Likes: 5541
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 08, 2018 14:00 |  #544

Rubbish weather here so no chance to try my cam out outdoors apart from this one in our garden.

P.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottboarding
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Gallery: 110 photos
Likes: 345
Joined May 2016
     
Feb 08, 2018 14:38 |  #545

bidkev wrote in post #18559120 (external link)
I think I might have spoken to soon despite the earlier pics??

The two best shots from my outdoor session today which was a failure. I'm waiting for a lens hood to arrive so here's hoping that's my problem. They just look "unresolved" poor resolution to me. Whether that's because I'm used to the IQ from full frame and apsc I don't know?? The lens obviously shines in close ups but I shot heaps of landscapes to day but binned the lot :-(

Any ideas?

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/22Nh​5h2  (external link) Olympus 17mm 1.8 test shots (1) (external link) by Kevin Dickinson (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/G2L2​1S  (external link) Olympus 17mm 1.8 test shots (2) (external link) by Kevin Dickinson (external link), on Flickr

If I had to guess, it's because you're shooting at f8. The m43 sensor is much smaller, and much more prone to diffraction. I never go past f5.6, and most of the time I stay at f4. The DoF is doubled, so shooting at f4 will give you the depth of field of f8 on a full frame. I find the sweet spot for M43 is f2.8 to f4 for deep depth of field. Certain lenses look fine at f5.6, but at f8 you're definitely going to get a heavy dose of diffraction.


Gear: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=18556308
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com​/photos/130385961@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,036 posts
Gallery: 1557 photos
Likes: 5541
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 08, 2018 14:48 |  #546

Scottboarding wrote in post #18559473 (external link)
If I had to guess, it's because you're shooting at f8. The m43 sensor is much smaller, and much more prone to diffraction. I never go past f5.6, and most of the time I stay at f4. The DoF is doubled, so shooting at f4 will give you the depth of field of f8 on a full frame. I find the sweet spot for M43 is f2.8 to f4 for deep depth of field. Certain lenses look fine at f5.6, but at f8 you're definitely going to get a heavy dose of diffraction.


But a fair amount of lenses have thier sweet spot at f8 esp if thier native largest ap is around f5.6 -f6 etc.

P.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,036 posts
Gallery: 1557 photos
Likes: 5541
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 08, 2018 16:03 |  #547

Took another cell phone shot of my new gear.

P.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bidkev
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 1989 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 9725
Joined Jul 2013
Location: From Blackpool UK to Brisbane Australia 20 yrs ago
     
Feb 08, 2018 16:50 |  #548

Scottboarding wrote in post #18559473 (external link)
If I had to guess, it's because you're shooting at f8. The m43 sensor is much smaller, and much more prone to diffraction. I never go past f5.6, and most of the time I stay at f4. The DoF is doubled, so shooting at f4 will give you the depth of field of f8 on a full frame. I find the sweet spot for M43 is f2.8 to f4 for deep depth of field. Certain lenses look fine at f5.6, but at f8 you're definitely going to get a heavy dose of diffraction.


Thanks for that as it confirms the only guess that I could come up with. I looked at my old M4/3 shots (I sold the gear but am now getting back into it) which obviously would be keepers, and they were all at lower apertures. Even the 14-150 shots wide open and full stretch, looked much sharper than the shots i took with the 17mm yesterday. I guess I wasn't thinking and applying the same thinking that I use with full frame. Everything I read said that there was little benefit, except at the edges in stopping this lens down and yet Duh!! I went and did it!:oops::oops:


See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/ (external link)
Olympus E-M5 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus Zuicko 12-40 2.8 pro | 40-150 | 75-300 |45mm 1.8 | 17mm 1.8 | 60mm 2.8 macro |Panasonic 12-32

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bidkev
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 1989 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 9725
Joined Jul 2013
Location: From Blackpool UK to Brisbane Australia 20 yrs ago
     
Feb 08, 2018 16:51 |  #549

Pagman wrote in post #18559479 (external link)
But a fair amount of lenses have thier sweet spot at f8 esp if thier native largest ap is around f5.6 -f6 etc.

P.

Yes, but 2.5 to 3 stops down is invariably the sweet spot on most lenses so with a 1.8...........what the hell am i doing at f8!!


See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/ (external link)
Olympus E-M5 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus Zuicko 12-40 2.8 pro | 40-150 | 75-300 |45mm 1.8 | 17mm 1.8 | 60mm 2.8 macro |Panasonic 12-32

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,036 posts
Gallery: 1557 photos
Likes: 5541
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 08, 2018 16:54 |  #550

bidkev wrote in post #18559552 (external link)
Yes, but 2.5 to 3 stops down is invariably the sweet spot on most lenses so with a 1.8...........what the hell am i doing at f8!!


Guess f7.1 is about right on the 75-300 though its max at 300 is only f6.7.

P.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bidkev
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 1989 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 9725
Joined Jul 2013
Location: From Blackpool UK to Brisbane Australia 20 yrs ago
     
Feb 08, 2018 17:00 |  #551

Pagman wrote in post #18559555 (external link)
Guess f7.1 is about right on the 75-300 though its max at 300 is only f6.7.

P.

Isn't that it's minimum?


See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/ (external link)
Olympus E-M5 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus Zuicko 12-40 2.8 pro | 40-150 | 75-300 |45mm 1.8 | 17mm 1.8 | 60mm 2.8 macro |Panasonic 12-32

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,036 posts
Gallery: 1557 photos
Likes: 5541
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 08, 2018 17:03 |  #552

bidkev wrote in post #18559559 (external link)
Isn't that it's minimum?


Its a f4.8 - 6.7.

P.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bidkev
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 1989 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 9725
Joined Jul 2013
Location: From Blackpool UK to Brisbane Australia 20 yrs ago
Post edited 6 months ago by bidkev.
     
Feb 08, 2018 17:41 |  #553

Pagman wrote in post #18559560 (external link)
Its a f4.8 - 6.7.

P.

Yes, but you can still close down another stop at the long end which will likely be it's sweet spot. Most zooms I've used always seem to perform better one to two stops down at the long end. Best way to check is to shoot the same subject at various stops and see which is the sweeter. different lengths along the zoom range can sometimes be different.

f8 seems to be the sweet spot here taken into consideration depth of field of course. Just shot this half an hour ago

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4613/40158564251_eab4899a1b_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/24bF​93P  (external link) Olympus 40 -150 Test (external link) by Kevin Dickinson (external link), on Flickr

See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/ (external link)
Olympus E-M5 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus Zuicko 12-40 2.8 pro | 40-150 | 75-300 |45mm 1.8 | 17mm 1.8 | 60mm 2.8 macro |Panasonic 12-32

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
8,036 posts
Gallery: 1557 photos
Likes: 5541
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 08, 2018 17:45 as a reply to  @ bidkev's post |  #554

I cant wait to see how it tackles BIF and planes in flight, I know it has the latest updates its at 4.3, so its had the AF improvements Oly was pushing out, also I understand the 75-300 mk 2 is no slouch in the focusing department.

It will be interesting.

P.


Some stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottboarding
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Gallery: 110 photos
Likes: 345
Joined May 2016
     
Feb 08, 2018 18:01 |  #555

bidkev wrote in post #18559552 (external link)
Yes, but 2.5 to 3 stops down is invariably the sweet spot on most lenses so with a 1.8...........what the hell am i doing at f8!!

I've always found f4 to be the best on my 25mm and 17mm. On my Mitakon 25mm f0.95, the sweet spot is f2, but that's still too shallow (for me) to use in everyday photography.


Gear: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=18556308
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com​/photos/130385961@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

151,101 views & 1,047 likes for this thread
The OMD photo thread
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Olympus Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is jrb2590
776 guests, 349 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.