Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 01 Mar 2018 (Thursday) 17:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

100-400 Canon vs Sigma

 
Andy ­ R
Goldmember
Avatar
1,840 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Likes: 1361
Joined Dec 2008
Location: So Cal
     
Mar 01, 2018 17:03 |  #1

Looking at the prices of the Sigma and canon mki are very similar


Sigma has come a long way with IQ, AF, and OS- but will the new Sigma 100-400 out perform the old Canon 100-400mki?

The sigma is smaller, lighter, a touch slower aperture, and the smaller filter size.

Has anyone done a comparison? DPReview doesn't have one, only specs.


5Dii ~ 80D
Canon 14L ~ Canon 24-105L mkII ~ Canon 50 f1.8 STM ~ Canon 135L ~ Sigma 100-400 ~ Canon 1.4x mkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
10,523 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 2314
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gig Harbor, Washington
Post edited over 1 year ago by umphotography.
     
Mar 01, 2018 17:49 |  #2

I will predict that the sigma will not come remotely close to the new 100-400 from Canon. Its one of the best updates that canon has done in a long long time. Its a stellar lens. Go the the thread below. Why chance a sigma when this current 100-400 is this good ?


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,732 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 493
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Post edited over 1 year ago by 05Xrunner.
     
Mar 01, 2018 18:07 |  #3

Guess reading fail. He asked about the sigma vs the original 100-400. Also hmmm the Canon cost $1000 more and is it $1000 better. Hell no
From test I see the IQ of the sigma and new Tamron 100-400 are about 95% the IQ of the Canon 100-400II. The autofocus seems to be better on the Tamron over the sigma but not a ton I have seen. So I would say it should be much better then the original Canon 100-400.


My gear
Fuji X-T2, Fuji 18-55 2.8-4 OIS, Fuji 35 f2, Fuji 56 1.2, Fuji 90 f2, Fuji 55-200 3.5-4.8 OIS
Sony RX100 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,840 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Likes: 1361
Joined Dec 2008
Location: So Cal
     
Mar 01, 2018 20:42 |  #4

Yeah I want something small and under 1k$ and the tamron and sigma look like they will fit the bill. I had the canon original 100-400 and and found the IQ to lack a bit and ended up with the 70-200 f4IS with a 1.4x attached but want the extra reach which is why I'm looking. Hopefully someone has hands on time with both?


5Dii ~ 80D
Canon 14L ~ Canon 24-105L mkII ~ Canon 50 f1.8 STM ~ Canon 135L ~ Sigma 100-400 ~ Canon 1.4x mkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,732 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 493
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Mar 01, 2018 21:01 |  #5

Look up Dustin Abbott on YouTube. He compared all 3


My gear
Fuji X-T2, Fuji 18-55 2.8-4 OIS, Fuji 35 f2, Fuji 56 1.2, Fuji 90 f2, Fuji 55-200 3.5-4.8 OIS
Sony RX100 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
18,383 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 1446
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Mar 01, 2018 23:16 |  #6

I haven't used the Sigma, but given their current lens performance I would say there's a good bet it will be at least as good as the V1 was, and potentially come out a little ahead. Being a 3rd stop slower might be somewhat hindering, but shouldn't be too bad.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (7D MkII/5D IV, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I Chimp, therefore I am
Avatar
5,547 posts
Gallery: 100 photos
Likes: 3224
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Mar 02, 2018 00:10 |  #7

I had a brief try with a Sigma 100-400. It was more like 80% of my Canon 100-400 II. (I realise that does not match review sites.)
I never had a Canon 100-400 MK1 but I have read hundreds of opinions and many from people I consider credible. Those reviews makes me think there has been come copy variation in that lens and possibly they were more consistent towards the end of their production run.

So in your situation, I would look for a 100-400 MK1 that I could try before buying. Wide open at 400mm would be the main test so not complicated.

I'd also check weight. Is the specified weight of the 100-400MK1 with or without tripod collar? If it is with, you can remove the tripod collar and it would be less than 10% heavier than the Sigma. If it's without, it's almost 20% heavier than the Sigma.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
35,586 posts
Gallery: 102 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 4994
Joined May 2002
Location: Cannelton
     
Mar 02, 2018 01:44 |  #8

The detail resolution of the original Canon wasn't that impressive, and the Sigma, and now the Tamron, beat the old Canon quite easily. There have been test after test, and resolution charts bearing this out. The Tamron sounds quite impressive actually. By latest accounts, the Tamron is the one to get.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,840 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Likes: 1361
Joined Dec 2008
Location: So Cal
     
Mar 02, 2018 17:09 |  #9

Choderboy wrote in post #18575659 (external link)
I had a brief try with a Sigma 100-400. It was more like 80% of my Canon 100-400 II. (I realise that does not match review sites.)
I never had a Canon 100-400 MK1 but I have read hundreds of opinions and many from people I consider credible. Those reviews makes me think there has been come copy variation in that lens and possibly they were more consistent towards the end of their production run.

So in your situation, I would look for a 100-400 MK1 that I could try before buying. Wide open at 400mm would be the main test so not complicated.

I'd also check weight. Is the specified weight of the 100-400MK1 with or without tripod collar? If it is with, you can remove the tripod collar and it would be less than 10% heavier than the Sigma. If it's without, it's almost 20% heavier than the Sigma.

I had a good copy of the mki, I just ordered the sigma so I'll post my thoughts after I spend a trip to the Everglades with it next weekend.


5Dii ~ 80D
Canon 14L ~ Canon 24-105L mkII ~ Canon 50 f1.8 STM ~ Canon 135L ~ Sigma 100-400 ~ Canon 1.4x mkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,840 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Likes: 1361
Joined Dec 2008
Location: So Cal
     
Mar 02, 2018 17:51 |  #10

05Xrunner wrote in post #18575592 (external link)
Look up Dustin Abbott on YouTube. He compared all 3


Great review thank you for the suggestion!


5Dii ~ 80D
Canon 14L ~ Canon 24-105L mkII ~ Canon 50 f1.8 STM ~ Canon 135L ~ Sigma 100-400 ~ Canon 1.4x mkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcoren
Senior Member
Avatar
624 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 303
Joined Mar 2015
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Post edited over 1 year ago by mcoren.
     
Mar 02, 2018 18:14 |  #11

Here’s a thread on the Sigma:

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1480679

Doesn’t look like anybody’s posted to it in a while. Maybe I’ll rectify that this weekend. ;-)a

Mike


Canon EOS 7D Mark II, EOS M5, and EOS 100 (film SLR)
A bunch of Canon lenses and a couple of Sigmas
A backpack, a bicycle, and a pair of hiking boots

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smmokan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,196 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Post edited over 1 year ago by smmokan.
     
Mar 09, 2018 23:09 |  #12

I haven't owned either the original Canon 100-400 or the new one, but my good friend has it and I have the Sigma 100-400. I use it mostly for action shots (of my dog, mountain biking, etc) and landscapes. To me, it's very sharp and focuses quite well. One of the supposed negatives was the lack of focus performance on objects that are coming straight at the lens. So I wanted to test that out, since I plan on shooting some MTB action shots with the rider coming right at me.

I've taken several others, but here's a shot I took this afternoon of my 2-yr old chocolate lab running full speed right at me, chasing her ball. I'm not sure how it'll upload here, but the picture is tack sharp when I open the file in LR. Taken with the 5D4.

It's less money and much lighter, so to me it's a no-brainer since it's one of my lesser used lenses. But it's very well made and the performance is right up there with my other lenses.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


www.ChasingEpicMTB.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,840 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Likes: 1361
Joined Dec 2008
Location: So Cal
     
Mar 19, 2018 23:07 |  #13

My sigma came in today and it looks and feels great! I'm excited to give it a try. I can tell the focus us a touch slower focus than the ef-mki but so far it seems like an upgrade. I'll post up thoughts after I get some photos uploaded.


5Dii ~ 80D
Canon 14L ~ Canon 24-105L mkII ~ Canon 50 f1.8 STM ~ Canon 135L ~ Sigma 100-400 ~ Canon 1.4x mkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
18,383 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 1446
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Mar 20, 2018 00:42 |  #14

Andy R wrote in post #18589757 (external link)
My sigma came in today and it looks and feels great! I'm excited to give it a try. I can tell the focus us a touch slower focus than the ef-mki but so far it seems like an upgrade. I'll post up thoughts after I get some photos uploaded.

Congrats! New toys are always fun :)


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (7D MkII/5D IV, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tongard
Senior Member
353 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Gloucestershire England
     
Mar 24, 2018 15:17 as a reply to  @ umphotography's post |  #15

Not correct my friend


Canon 6d, 7d2.
Canon 50 1.4, 28mm 2.8 is , 24-85, 24-105, 70-200 f4 is
Sigma 150-600

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,602 views & 19 likes for this thread
100-400 Canon vs Sigma
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Gregmcc
1020 guests, 340 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.