Jarvis Creative Studios wrote in post #18607824
I think sometimes this lens gets overlooked because people think of it as a 50 1.8, and everyone else's 50 1.8 is $100-$150, so $1000 seems crazy. But in terms of iq it's much more similar to something like the sigma 50 1.4. Couple that with lightning fast after (the AF on my sigma 50 1.4 art always struggled a bit) and tiny, light form factor, this lens is definitely worth the price of admission for me.
Thanks for the insight...my 50Art works nicely on the a9, and after the updates to the MB, it works great on the r2 as well. I had issues with the FE50 f/1.4, it did not perform as well. I might have to look into the 55...although my heart is set on the FE35 f/1.4.
MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18607865
Another stunner Travis!
Gauranteed to be explored.
That will make how many explored? 200+ I'd bet!
you are too kind sir...and no...not 200 for me...actually missed last week, file upload error on my part, posted the wrong one, and it was too small for the 1600 px rule...to date only 55 for me...so you have quite the advantage. But its not really the point, and the quality of images has gone way down in EXPLORE lately...been seeing a lot of crap that just doesn't make sense...and dolls...WTF...I just post what I want...lately it is taking me a while to edit, I am so behind...