Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM -- Lens Sample Photo Archive in photography-on-the.net forums

johnandbentley

Senior Member

947 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 193
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Twin Cities

More info

Apr 10, 2018 13:50 | #76

Love the results from this lens.

6D, Sigma 24mm f1.4 art, sigma 85 f1.4 art

LIKES 0

Ah-keong

Goldmember

1,297 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2660
Joined Apr 2016

More info

Apr 10, 2018 21:01 | #77

seems like the f/1,4L retains some of the signature "magic" that the f/1,2L render....

LIKES 1

tim1970

Senior Member

700 posts
Gallery: 163 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 689
Joined Dec 2010

More info

Apr 15, 2018 19:17 | #78

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II • 1/800 • f/1.4 • ISO 50

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/864/39676045350_660a8e9196_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/23s36Zq

Roth-104

by Tim Richardson

, on Flickr

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II • 1/2000 • f/1.4 • ISO 50

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/891/40771017484_7fdb77fa1e_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/257N84j

Roth-103

by Tim Richardson

, on Flickr

Gear

Flickr | Web Page

LIKES 1

fordmondeo

I was Soupdragon in a former life.

1,254 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 384
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sunny Southern England

More info

Post edited over 4 years ago by fordmondeo.

Apr 16, 2018 04:13 as a reply to @ tim1970's post | #79

The background blur is really smooth in the first one.

Vaginator9000

LIKES 0

DaviSto

... sorry. I got carried away!

1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria

More info

Apr 16, 2018 18:28 as a reply to @ fordmondeo's post | #80

Beg to differ. I think the blur on the second image is actually quite rough and uneasy on the eye.

David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

LIKES 0

fordmondeo

I was Soupdragon in a former life.

1,254 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 384
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sunny Southern England

More info

Apr 17, 2018 06:04 | #81

DaviSto wrote in post #18608156

Beg to differ. I think the blur on the second image is actually quite rough and uneasy on the eye.

Well that's a matter of opinion.
I owned the 85mm 1.2 l ii and once I noticed mirror box clipping on specular highlights I could no longer not see it.

I have not seen the phenomenon with 85 1.4 L and am pleased with that.

Vaginator9000

LIKES 0

artsf

Senior Member

400 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 395
Joined Sep 2015

More info

Apr 17, 2018 11:39 | #82

fordmondeo wrote in post #18608390

I think this photo was shot in bright daylight with flash so it affected the bokeh. In general, bokeh of 85IS is actually nicer than 85ii which exhibits nervousness outside of central area in full body portraits. Regardless, I often add additional lens blur in PS so it’s all correctable.

LIKES 0

DaviSto

... sorry. I got carried away!

1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria

More info

Apr 17, 2018 15:43 | #83

fordmondeo wrote in post #18608390

I agree, it's a matter of opinion ... and my opinion is that the bokeh in the second image is not attractive at all.

But I'm not judging the lens on this and I'm not trying to make a spurious comparison with the "I really don't know what you might have got" bokeh from another lens.

I'm just saying ... that's not nice bokeh.

David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

LIKES 0

white venom

Goldmember

1,320 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1256
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee

More info

Apr 19, 2018 11:09 | #84

I'm impressed with the AF on this lens, This image is of my dog Running at me full speed. I shot it at F1.6 and nailed his eye in focus

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV • 1/2000 • f/1.6 • ISO 200

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/826/26693723497_523ec7aa92_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GEQj12

5D4_3138

by RJ Prusik

, on Flickr

Gear List~Website~Facebook~500px~flickr
Feedback-1 2 3 4 5

LIKES 6

tim1970

Senior Member

700 posts
Gallery: 163 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 689
Joined Dec 2010

More info

Apr 23, 2018 22:34 | #85

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/879/26792845607_4234f4abc4_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GPAkxV

Duvall-105

by Tim Richardson

, on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/901/26792847547_6ac7bec4bb_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GPAm8n

Duvall-104

by Tim Richardson

, on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/836/26792848657_df18794bf4_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GPAmsv

Duvall-103

by Tim Richardson

, on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/927/41660364131_4c0f59db56_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/26tofQc

Duvall-101

by Tim Richardson

, on Flickr

Gear

Flickr | Web Page

LIKES 3

artsf

Senior Member

400 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 395
Joined Sep 2015

More info

Apr 27, 2018 02:05 | #86

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV • Canon EF 85mm F1.4L IS USM @85mm • 1/320 • f/1.4 • ISO 125

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/04/4/LQ_910752.jpg

Image hosted by forum (910752) © artsf [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV • Canon EF 85mm F1.4L IS USM @85mm • 1/320 • f/2.5 • ISO 250

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/04/4/LQ_910753.jpg

Image hosted by forum (910753) © artsf [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

can’t get enough of this lens

LIKES 5

pxl8

Goldmember

1,108 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 119
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Somerset, UK

More info

May 04, 2018 04:42 | #88

Traded the 1.2L II for the 1.4L IS as I needed faster focusing. Absolutely no regrets.

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV • 1/4000 • f/1.4 • ISO 200

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/05/1/LQ_911890.jpg

Image hosted by forum (911890) © pxl8 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

-- PXL8
1DmkIV, 5DmkIII + 135mm f/2L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, Sigma 35mm f/1.4

LIKES 17

fordmondeo

I was Soupdragon in a former life.

1,254 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 384
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sunny Southern England

More info

May 04, 2018 05:55 | #89

pxl8 wrote in post #18619215

Traded the 1.2L II for the 1.4L IS as I needed faster focusing. Absolutely no regrets.

Hosted photo: posted by pxl8 in
./showthread.php?p=18619215&i=i98269488
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive

Your puppy?????

Vaginator9000

LIKES 0

Motaw

Member

68 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 125
Joined Mar 2017

More info

May 08, 2018 09:18 as a reply to @ pxl8's post | #90

That's great to hear. Did you look at the Sigma 1.4 as an option as well?

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/motaw/
IG: VisualsbyLawrence

LIKES 0

Jump to forum... • Rules • Forums • New posts • RTAT • 'Best of' • Gallery • Gear • Reviews • Member list • Polls • Image rules • Search • Password reset • Home

Not a member yet?

Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

THEME: Paper White | Darker
MARGINS: (this page: defaults)

Latest registered member is griggt
1361 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.

	x 1600
	y 1600