RX100VI with a 24-200mm F2.8-F4.5 WOW
Jun 05, 2018 10:37 | #17282 pretty darn amazing pns Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 05, 2018 11:32 | #17283 24-200...wow...but $1200 is a lot for a point and shoot... Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 05, 2018 12:21 | #17284 TRhoads wrote in post #18639642 24-200...wow...but $1200 is a lot for a point and shoot... I agree. I would save and buy the A6500 instead. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 05, 2018 12:27 | #17285 vinmunoz wrote in post #18639674 I agree. I would save and buy the A6500 instead. the advantage of the RX is the size...and built in lens. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2018 12:31 | #17286 It's an odd camera. Specs are great, but how many people really need 24fps and a9 caliber AF in a p&s? O focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 05, 2018 12:54 | #17287 mystik610 wrote in post #18639679 It's an odd camera. Specs are great, but how many people really need 24fps and a9 caliber AF in a p&s? O I'd like to see sony do more larger sensor, fast glass p&s cameras. Ricoh GR type stuff I want a native 135... Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2018 12:55 | #17288 TRhoads wrote in post #18639690 I want a native 135... Lol. Sony gave us 4 iterations of the RX100 before they gave us a native 135 focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2018 13:15 | #17289 TRhoads wrote in post #18639690 I want a native 135... fortunately, the sigma 135A is a viable option, but that 35f2 AF.......... THAT's low hanging fruit! Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2018 13:28 | #17290 Charlie wrote in post #18639706 fortunately, the sigma 135A is a viable option, but that 35f2 AF.......... THAT's low hanging fruit! 200mm f2.8/f2 would be nice, preferably lightweight 2.8 would be lovely SAR says a batis 40 f2 is OTW. I'd be game for that focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 05, 2018 13:41 | #17291 mystik610 wrote in post #18639692 Lol. Sony gave us 4 iterations of the RX100 before they gave us a native 135 LOL...they are trying to corner every market out there...I bought my wife a nice advanced P&S a couple years ago...she never uses it and lost the battery charger...so I am not sure who they are targeting with that model line... Charlie wrote in post #18639706 fortunately, the sigma 135A is a viable option, but that 35f2 AF.......... THAT's low hanging fruit! 200mm f2.8/f2 would be nice, preferably lightweight 2.8 would be lovely I have my 135L, and when I need it, it does fine on the a9, and ok on the r2...a 200 f2.8 would be pretty slick, but it would be $3k....LOL... mystik610 wrote in post #18639714 SAR says a batis 40 f2 is OTW. I'd be game for that the 35 f/2 folks might like that... Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2018 13:56 | #17292 mystik610 wrote in post #18639714 SAR says a batis 40 f2 is OTW. I'd be game for that on the fence about that, I suppose it could work. I dont want to lose that 5mm, and i'de have to try it for a while to feel it out again. Did have the 40 pancake by canon, but preferred their 35 f2 more simply because of focal length. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeeRatters Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 05, 2018 14:05 | #17293 Charlie wrote in post #18639730 I'm loving the IQ of the SY 35 f1.4, but already having instant regret due to size ![]() The Samyang AF 35/1.4???
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Eddie xpfloyd lookalike More info | Jun 05, 2018 14:13 | #17294 Wow indeed, that camera looks awesome mystik610 wrote in post #18639714 SAR says a batis 40 f2 is OTW. I'd be game for that I’m in!!!!!! Man, hope this is correct. I was wanting a 35 but could live with an AF 40. The cv40 seemed like a perfect one lens option but I need AF Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2018 14:19 | #17295 LeeRatters wrote in post #18639732 The Samyang AF 35/1.4??? I was just about to ask if anyone had that with the A7 or how it works with the old A7 because a used one has come up on a local forum........?? ![]() ![]() ![]() I wish I knew, otherwise it behaves like a native lens on the R3 and R2. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1025 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||